Health & FitnessFitnessSportsScienceLife Sciences

The Athlete's Compass

Athletica

The Athlete’s Compass Podcast is your compass for navigating endurance training and health. In this show, we explore the cardinal directions of training, nutrition, recovery, and mindset, delving into the dynamic relationship that drives athletic success.

Athletes are more than numbers; they're individuals with unique lifestyles and mindset challenges. Coaches who understand these personal nuances play a vital role in their athletes' journey. While training details and data are important, tools like Athletica provide a solution to streamline the technicalities, allowing coaches to focus on the human connection which makes the human coaches the best they can be.

Each week, renowned sports scientist and researcher Paul Laursen will be our teacher and guide as we break down training principles so you can understand how best to train for your sport! We take a no-bullshit and practical approach to support age-groupers, masters, and everyday cyclists, runners, and triathletes like you as you find your direction as an athlete.

The hosts are Paul Laursen, sports scientist and founder of the Athletica.ai training platform, Marjana Rakai, coach, sports scientist, and triathlete, and Paul Warloski, coach and cyclist.

Play

Open in

28 episodes
weekly
Avg 39 min
English

Episodes 28

Newest Oldest Longest

All20 Unplayed20 In progress0 Played0

Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.

#149
Yesterday · 46 min
The Biggest Nutrition Mistake Aging Athletes Make
Are you fueling your training for the athlete you are today—or following the nutrition advice that worked 20 years ago? In this episode of The Athletes Compass, hosts Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen welcome Kristen Arnold, registered sports dietitian and team nutritionist for EF Pro Cycling, to explore how nutrition influences endurance performance, recovery, and longevity as we age. Kristen explains why masters athletes may be chronically underfueling, how protein helps preserve muscle mass, and why menopausal women shouldn't automatically cut carbohydrates. The conversation also covers hydration, fueling for different workout durations, nutrition's relationship with sleep, and the surprising connection between eating enough and improving body composition. With practical examples from professional cycling and everyday athletes, this episode challenges common nutrition myths and offers actionable strategies for training stronger and staying healthy for years to come. Key takeaways - Protein becomes increasingly important with age. Kristen recommends approximately 1.8–2.2 grams per kilogram of body weight per day for endurance athletes, emphasizing that masters athletes have less room for consistently missing their needs. - Menopause doesn't mean abandoning carbohydrates. The overall carbohydrate requirements of endurance athletes remain similar, but timing and food selection deserve greater attention. Simple carbohydrates can support training, while complex carbohydrates are valuable throughout the rest of the day. - Underfueling can undermine performance and longevity. Persistent fatigue, stalled training progress, and excessive preoccupation with food may indicate that an athlete isn't consuming enough energy. - Muscle mass matters more than the number on the scale. Preserving or building lean body mass supports strength, mobility, metabolic function, and healthy aging. - Fueling should reflect workout duration and intensity. A short, easy workout doesn't require the same carbohydrate intake as a long race or demanding interval session. - Hydration can become more challenging with age. Declining thirst sensations mean older athletes shouldn't rely exclusively on thirst cues, particularly during extended training. - Foundational nutrition comes before advanced recovery strategies. Getting enough calories, protein, and carbohydrates should come before experimenting with specialized supplements or bedtime recovery foods. - Supplements aren't a substitute for proper nutrition. Kristen cautions against expensive supplement routines without a clear purpose or individual need. - Individualization is essential. Even professional athletes differ in digestive tolerance, carbohydrate utilization, daily energy requirements, and practical fueling preferences. Kristen Arnold Sports Nutrition for Women Try Athletica | Adaptive Endurance Training Plans Powered by Sports Science Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#148
October 1 · 23 min
The Hidden Endurance Secret of Hill Repeats
Hill repeats can provide endurance athletes with a powerful mix of strength, speed, neuromuscular, and cardiovascular benefits without requiring frequent all-out sprinting. Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen explain how running or cycling uphill changes muscle recruitment, why different hill workouts produce different adaptations, and how athletes can use short 30-second efforts, longer strength-endurance intervals, or downhill running depending on their goals. They also discuss gradient, recovery, progression, aging, strength training, and one of the most important rules of high-intensity training: finish with something left in reserve rather than training to exhaustion. Key takeaways Hill repeats change movement mechanics and muscle recruitment compared with flat running or cycling. Uphill running acts somewhat like functional strength training, requiring greater force production through a running-specific movement pattern. Short uphill intervals such as 30 seconds hard / 30 seconds easy can provide a strong cardiovascular and VO₂ max stimulus while reducing some of the high-speed hamstring loading associated with flat sprinting. Downhill running creates an eccentric muscle-loading stimulus that can improve an athlete’s resilience to future downhill running through the repeated-bout effect. The ideal hill workout depends on the goal: VO₂ max, running strength, downhill durability, trail preparation, or cycling strength endurance. Hill gradient may matter less than athletes think. The episode cites research suggesting athletes improved across a range of gradients. Hill repeats should generally not be performed to exhaustion. Finish feeling as though you could complete another one or two quality repetitions. Recovery should be long enough to preserve the quality of subsequent repetitions. Beginners should start conservatively—even one or two repetitions can serve as an introduction—and progressively add volume. Masters athletes may require more recovery than younger athletes, but a weekly hill session can still provide a useful training stimulus. Strength training and hill work can potentially be grouped on the same harder training day, followed by an easier recovery day. Consistency and progressive overload matter more than finding a theoretically perfect hill workout. Try Athletica | Adaptive Endurance Training Plans Powered by Sports Science Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#147
September 24 · 25 min
Run Faster Without Running More
Episode Summary Want to run faster but don’t have time—or the recovery capacity—to add more mileage? Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen explain how runners can improve performance by getting more from the training they already do. They discuss auditing training intensity, polarized training, high-intensity intervals, strides, hills, cycling, heat training, strength and plyometric work, running economy, recovery, and fueling. They also explain why one quality session per week may be enough to produce meaningful improvements and offer a simple four-day training framework for time-crunched runners. Key Takeaways More mileage isn’t the only path to faster running. Training quality, intensity, strength, running economy, and recovery can all improve performance. Start by auditing your intensity distribution. Too many runners spend excessive time in the moderate “gray zone.” For someone running four or five times per week, a useful framework is roughly three to four easy sessions and one to two quality sessions. One high-intensity session per week can be enough for recreational runners to improve. Runners new to speed work should begin with strides, then progressively introduce sessions such as 30/30 intervals, tempo work, and longer VO₂-max-style intervals. Progressive overload matters. Don’t jump straight into demanding track workouts. Hill running can simultaneously challenge the muscular and cardiovascular systems while encouraging an effective drive phase in the running stride. Heavy strength training—including squats, lunges, and deadlifts—can improve running economy. Plyometric work can improve neuromuscular efficiency and potentially transfer to better running performance. Cross-training such as cycling can add cardiovascular stimulus without the same neuromuscular load as additional running. Heat or sauna exposure is discussed as another potential way to stimulate cardiovascular adaptations. Recovery is part of training. Making easy days genuinely easy can improve your ability to absorb harder sessions. For masters athletes, maintaining strength, intensity and adequate recovery becomes especially important. One of the episode’s simplest principles: “The most important session is the next session.” Try Athletica | Adaptive Endurance Training Plans Powered by Sports Science Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#146
September 17 · 35 min
How to Improve Your Running Economy
Two runners can have similar fitness and VO₂ max numbers yet perform very differently. One reason is running economy—the metabolic cost of maintaining a given running speed. Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen explain why economy is different from mechanical efficiency, how it can be assessed in the lab and through everyday training data, and why it improves through consistent running, high-intensity work, heavy strength training and plyometrics. They also examine running form, vertical oscillation, stride length, fatigue, aging, carbon-plated shoes and metrics such as efficiency factor and aerobic decoupling. The practical message is simple: a bigger aerobic engine helps, but learning to use that engine economically can translate into better performance. Key takeaways Running economy is essentially your running “fuel economy.” It describes how much oxygen and metabolic energy you need to maintain a particular speed. VO₂ max and running economy are different. A runner can possess a very large aerobic engine without converting that capacity into equally fast performances. Simply training consistently can improve economy. Both higher-volume aerobic work and high-intensity training contribute to physiological and neuromuscular adaptations. Strength training matters. Heavy squats, deadlifts and lunges are discussed as ways to improve neuromuscular recruitment and ultimately running economy. Plyometrics can help too. Jumps, step-downs and other explosive exercises train the stretch-shortening cycle and elastic recoil. Strides, hills and intervals provide running-specific neuromuscular training. Short, fast efforts help recruit larger motor units and train force production. Running form is partly an outcome of training. Lower vertical oscillation, shorter ground-contact time and effective forward movement are associated with better economy, while deliberately changing form can initially make running less economical. Fatigue reduces economy. Maintaining movement quality late in long runs and races is part of what is described as durability—or, alternatively, resistance to fatigability. Strength becomes particularly important with age. Continuing to recruit larger motor units may help masters athletes counter some age-related changes. Carbon-plated shoes can improve economy, but the response is individual. The episode emphasizes training quality before footwear technology. Efficiency factor and aerobic decoupling offer useful field indicators. Trends over time are more meaningful than judging economy from one isolated workout. Try Athletica | Adaptive Endurance Training Plans Powered by Sports Science Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#145
September 10 · 31 min
Why Your VO₂ Max Isn’t Rising
VO₂ max is one of endurance sport’s most closely watched metrics, but what does it mean when the number refuses to rise? Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen explain why a plateau—particularly for experienced and older athletes—can actually indicate successful training. They explore the roles of aging, genetics, aerobic volume, Zone 1 and Zone 2 work, high-intensity intervals, fat oxidation, recovery, nutrition, and life stress. The central message is that VO₂ max development isn’t about finding a shortcut or completing ever-harder workouts. A strong aerobic foundation, carefully controlled intensity, consistency, and sufficient recovery matter more—and improvements in fitness and performance can occur even when the VO₂ max number itself barely changes. Key Episode Takeaways Maintaining VO₂ max can be a win. Because VO₂ max tends to decline with age, an older athlete who keeps the same number may actually be outperforming the expected age-related trajectory. Your training history matters. Someone relatively new to endurance training may have considerable room to improve VO₂ max, while a lifelong, highly trained athlete is likely much closer to their ceiling. Aerobic volume comes first. Laursen describes consistent low-intensity training as the foundation, with HIIT being more like the “icing on the cake.” Zone 1 and Zone 2 help prepare you to absorb hard training. Greater aerobic development supports recovery and may make subsequent high-intensity work more productive. Both long and short intervals can work. Examples include 2–5 minute VO₂ max intervals, 1 km running repeats, 4 x 4-minute sessions, and 30/30 intervals. Five-minute power or pace can be a useful external marker. Laursen describes maximal sustainable output around five minutes as closely associated with VO₂ max. Don’t chase heart rate during short VO₂ max intervals. Because heart rate responds with a lag, pace or power is a more useful variable for controlling the session. Going harder isn’t automatically better. Starting too aggressively can reduce the total quality work you accumulate. The aim is controlled time above threshold rather than a “hero workout.” Fat oxidation may matter even at high intensity. A study discussed in the episode found fat oxidation distinguished elite orienteers from recreational athletes despite other measures being similar. Older athletes may need more recovery. One or perhaps two hard sessions per week may be more appropriate than the three an athlete could tolerate when younger, depending on individual recovery. Be skeptical of dramatic VO₂ max “hacks.” The episode argues that consistent progressive training, aerobic volume, HIIT, nutrition, and recovery remain the major levers. Life stress counts as training stress. Poor recovery and elevated overall stress may interfere with adaptations, making sleep, relaxation, and workload management part of the performance equation. Try Athletica | Adaptive Endurance Training Plans Powered by Sports Science Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#144
September 3 · 33 min
Why Stopping Was My Best Decision: 1,000km Across France with Jens Wachter
Endurance athlete and Athletica user Jens joins Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen to share the story behind Project Trans France, his ambitious attempt to run roughly 1,000 kilometers across France in just 17 days while pulling a self-supported trailer. Jens explains how years of ultrarunning and orienteering shaped his approach, how he incorporated high-volume training into an ordinary workweek, and how Athletica helped him adapt his workload based on heart rate, HRV, sleep, and recovery. Once the project began, an intense European heat wave and a worsening groin injury forced constant adjustments. Ultimately, Jens made the difficult decision to stop—not because his motivation disappeared, but because his body was sending unmistakable warning signs. The conversation is a powerful reminder that successful endurance training is as much about adaptability, self-awareness, and decision-making as it is about fitness. Key Episode Takeaways Huge goals become manageable when broken into smaller units. Jens turned 1,000 kilometers over 17 days into a target of roughly 60 km per day, then split each day into two 30 km sessions. Training has to fit real life. Rather than building his life entirely around training, Jens used his commute to incorporate running, cycling, elevation, and back-to-back sessions. Progress eventually becomes durability. For an ultra-endurance challenge, simply getting faster wasn't the objective; Jens needed to develop the ability to repeat a sustainable workload day after day. Adaptability matters more than rigid adherence. Illness, injury, work commitments, and changing conditions required continual modification of the plan. Recovery data can provide useful context. Jens used heart rate, HRV, sleep, training load, and Athletica's coaching feedback to help identify when to push and when to back off. Don't try new gear immediately before a major event. Jens believes using fresh, insufficiently tested equipment during a long training run contributed to his groin issue—a classic reminder of the "nothing new on race day" rule. Environmental conditions can completely change the challenge. The heat wave in France elevated Jens' heart rate and dramatically reduced the pace and volume he could safely sustain. Know your personal warning signs. Jens recognized agitation, excessive heart rate, exhaustion, swelling, and increasing pain as indicators that something was wrong. Stopping can be an endurance skill. After consulting medical support and reassessing his injury, Jens chose not to continue simply for the sake of completing the challenge. Remember why you started. His closing advice is simple: "Be kind to yourself and keep it simple." When things become difficult, reconnecting with the reason behind the goal can help guide the next decision. Try Athletica | Adaptive Endurance Training Plans Powered by Sports Science Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#143
August 27 · 34 min
Norwegian Method vs Polarized: What’s Better?
The Norwegian method has become one of endurance sport’s hottest training topics, thanks largely to elite performances, double-threshold sessions, and lactate-guided intensity control. But is it really an alternative to traditional 80/20 training? Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen unpack what the so-called Norwegian method actually involves and explain why it may have far more in common with polarized training than athletes realize. The conversation explores lactate testing, sub-threshold training, double-threshold days, recovery, race specificity, training for masters athletes, and why everyday runners, cyclists, and triathletes probably shouldn’t throw out their current training plans in pursuit of the latest trend. Key takeaways The Norwegian method isn’t necessarily one single training system. Dr. Marius Bakken’s approach is one particular version built around intensity control, lactate monitoring, muscle status, and repeatable training. 80/20 and Norwegian-style training overlap significantly. The majority of training remains low-intensity aerobic work. The most important lesson may not be “do more threshold”, but rather “control your threshold work better.” Bakken’s approach generally keeps sub-threshold work controlled enough that the athlete can accumulate substantial quality without creating excessive fatigue. Lactate is used as a marker of physiological stress, helping athletes avoid pushing sessions beyond the intended intensity. Double-threshold days allow highly trained athletes to concentrate demanding work on hard days, followed by genuinely easy recovery days. A typical structure discussed in the episode could feature three higher-stress days during the week, separated by low-intensity recovery days. The Norwegian approach can sometimes look more pyramidal than strictly polarized, with additional work in the moderate/sub-threshold range. Specificity still matters. An 800m runner, marathoner, criterium cyclist, gravel racer, and triathlete should not perform identical intensity sessions. For athletes training roughly 6–10 hours per week, copying elite double-threshold programs literally is usually unnecessary. Triathletes could potentially apply the principle by putting a harder bike and harder run on the same day, rather than performing two run threshold sessions. Athletes do not necessarily need a lactate meter. Training just under critical pace, critical power, FTP, or a similar second-threshold marker can approximate the same principle. Masters athletes can use the same concepts, but recovery capacity becomes increasingly important with age. Subjective signals—including muscle stiffness, fatigue, mental freshness, and the feeling of having “pop”—can help determine readiness. The ultimate recommendation: don’t overhaul your training simply because the Norwegian method is fashionable. Keep the aerobic foundation and borrow the principles that make sense for your training history, event, and recovery capacity. Try Athletica | Adaptive Endurance Training Plans Powered by Sports Science Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#142
August 20 · 31 min
How to Find Your Zone 2 Without a Lab Test
Episode Summary Zone 2 gets talked about constantly in endurance training, but most everyday athletes don’t have access to lactate testing or a metabolic lab. In this episode of The Athletes Compass Podcast, Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen explain practical ways to estimate Zone 2 using the talk test, breathing, perceived effort, heart rate, the MAF formula, power and pace. They discuss why athletes frequently drift into Zone 3, how threshold testing can improve accuracy, and when laboratory testing may—or may not—be worth the expense. The central message is simple: Zone 2 should feel like steady work, and combining multiple signals is often more useful than relying on a single number. Key Takeaways Zone 2 is aimed at developing aerobic capacity and maximizing the contribution of fat oxidation at a sustainable exercise intensity. The talk test is the simplest no-tech tool: you should still be able to speak in full sentences. A noticeable rise in breathing is associated with crossing the first ventilatory threshold, as carbohydrate contribution and ventilation increase. RPE matters. Paul Laursen describes Zone 2 as “steady work”—sustainable exercise that feels controlled rather than tempo-like. Athletes can triangulate talk test, breathing and perceived effort when they have no technology available. With a heart-rate monitor, 180 minus age—the MAF formula—can provide a starting point, but individual variation means it should not be treated as an exact threshold. A chest-strap heart-rate monitor is preferable when accuracy matters. Age-based formulas have limitations, especially for athletes whose maximum or threshold heart rates differ substantially from population averages. Threshold tests using heart rate, pace or power can help identify whether an athlete is an outlier and refine training zones. Athletes often accidentally turn easy sessions into Zone 3 training, particularly when trying to stay with faster training partners. One of the episode’s recurring principles is that athletes may need to “slow down before you can speed up.” Lactate and metabolic testing can provide greater precision, but only if the equipment, protocol and interpretation are reliable. Emerging respiratory wearables may make breathing frequency and ventilation increasingly useful for identifying intensity zones in real time. Try Athletica | Adaptive Endurance Training Plans Powered by Sports Science How Athletica Closes the Cycle: From Athlete Profiling to Training Prescription Zone 2 Training Benefits: The Science Explained Zone 2 Training Plans (Ultimate Guide) Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#141
August 13 · 32 min
Do Hills and Sprints Cancel Your Zone 2 Benefits?
Does a short climb, town-line sprint, or brief surge above Zone 2 undo the benefits of an endurance workout? Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen explain why the answer is generally no. Brief excursions above LT1 or VT1 don’t suddenly erase aerobic adaptations, and short bursts can even provide useful neuromuscular stimulus. The bigger issue is repeatedly turning easy training into moderate or hard training, accumulating fatigue and compromising the quality of the sessions that are supposed to be hard. The discussion covers the physiology behind Zone 2, fat and carbohydrate use, heart-rate recovery, polarized training, athlete phenotype, training age, recovery status, and why beginners, masters athletes, and experienced endurance athletes may need different approaches. Key Takeaways A few seconds or minutes above Zone 2 won’t ruin an endurance session. Short hills, accelerations, and occasional surges are generally nothing to worry about. The pattern matters more than an isolated effort. Problems arise when easy sessions repeatedly drift into Zone 3 and become moderately hard workouts. Zone 2 has a physiological basis. The discussion centers on the first ventilatory/lactate threshold, where breathing and carbohydrate use begin to rise noticeably. Going harder increases carbohydrate use and muscle-fiber recruitment. More ATP demand means greater reliance on glycolysis and increased recruitment of faster-twitch fibers. Aerobic adaptations don’t switch off instantly above LT1. A brief excursion above the threshold doesn’t erase the signaling or adaptations accumulated earlier in the workout. Heart rate can provide useful context. Because heart rate responds more slowly than pace or power, a very brief power surge may barely affect heart-rate zones. Recovery speed is itself a fitness signal. Better-conditioned athletes generally return to an aerobic state more rapidly following harder efforts. Short sprints can be useful. Ten-second efforts primarily challenge the neuromuscular and anaerobic alactic systems and may add a useful training stimulus without the metabolic cost of longer all-out efforts. The most important session is the next session. Training consistency matters more than squeezing extra intensity into every workout. Easy training helps make hard training harder. Keeping most sessions genuinely easy can preserve the ability to execute key interval workouts at higher quality. Beginners should generally protect Zone 2 more carefully. Athletes without a well-developed aerobic base may experience greater heart-rate drift and benefit from keeping easy sessions truly easy. Training age matters enormously. Years of consistent aerobic development influence how much intensity an athlete can absorb and how quickly they recover. Recovery status changes the answer. Poor sleep, suppressed HRV, high life stress, or accumulated fatigue are reasons to keep an endurance session strictly easy. Fuel according to the athlete and session. Athletes who struggle with low blood sugar or weakness during training may benefit from carbohydrate intake, particularly when harder efforts are unavoidable. Try Athletica | Adaptive Endurance Training Plans Powered by Sports Science Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#140
August 6 · 32 min
When to Perform High-Intensity Intervals
Should endurance athletes complete high-intensity intervals while fresh, or place them later in a workout after accumulating fatigue? Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen explain why the answer depends on the type of fatigue involved. General systemic or neuromuscular fatigue may be a reason to postpone intensity, while lower muscle-glycogen availability can amplify signals associated with mitochondrial development and fatigue resistance. The discussion covers AMPK, fat oxidation, fast-twitch muscle fibers, running mechanics, heat, race specificity, athlete type, training experience, and why experienced athletes may benefit from occasionally performing intervals later in a session—even when their power output is lower. Key takeaways Not all fatigue is the same. Suppressed HRV, neuromuscular fatigue, and feeling systemically depleted are different from deliberately training with reduced glycogen availability. Do not force intensity when genuinely under-recovered. When the central nervous system appears flat or muscle tone and coordination are impaired, recovery or easy aerobic work may be more appropriate. Lower glycogen can increase the adaptive signal. The episode explains that training with reduced glycogen may amplify AMPK signaling, encouraging mitochondrial development. Lower power does not necessarily mean a poor session. Intervals performed later in a workout may produce less power while still creating a strong physiological stimulus. The aerobic system supports repeatable power. Training fast-twitch fibers under depleted conditions may help those fibers become more fatigue-resistant while retaining their strength. Running requires greater caution than cycling. Fatigue can alter stride length, ground-contact time, stiffness, and movement patterns, potentially increasing injury risk. Experienced athletes are better candidates for fatigue-state intervals. Beginners should generally complete a manageable warm-up and perform their intervals with good form and quality. Athlete profile matters. “Twitchy” athletes may require more recovery than diesel-type athletes, both between intervals and between demanding training days. Heat adds another stressor. High temperatures may increase glycogen use and reduce the ability to sustain interval quality, so heat-based sessions require careful control. Use fatigue-state intervals selectively. They are a tool for building durability, not a requirement for every high-intensity workout. Try Athletica | Adaptive Endurance Training Plans Powered by Sports Science Athlete Profiling Primer Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#139
July 30 · 35 min
How Much HIIT Do You Actually Need?
High-intensity interval training can produce rapid improvements, but repeatedly pushing to maximal effort may undermine recovery, consistency, and long-term progress. Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen discuss why HIIT must be supported by low-intensity aerobic training, how excessive intensity affects the nervous system, and why the appropriate dose depends on training history, age, conditioning, and individual recovery. They also explain how athletes can monitor heart-rate variability, sleep, perceived exertion, muscle tone, pace, and power to recognize when productive overload is becoming non-functional overreaching. The central message is simple: HIIT is powerful, but the smartest athletes use the minimum effective dose and preserve enough energy for the next session. Key takeaways HIIT is potent, but it is not a complete training system. It can create strong short-term gains, especially in cardiovascular performance and fast-twitch muscle-fiber recruitment, but it needs an aerobic foundation. Zone 2 supports sustainable progress. Low-intensity training continues to provide an adaptive signal without imposing the same stress response as repeated high-intensity sessions. Too much HIIT can disrupt nervous-system balance. Frequent hard sessions may elevate sympathetic stress while reducing the recovery influence of the parasympathetic system. Recovery needs are individual. Training age, conditioning, age, muscular status, and previous exposure to intensity all affect how much HIIT an athlete can tolerate. Roughly 48 hours between hard sessions is a useful starting point. The episode presents this as a general guideline rather than a universal rule. One to two HIIT sessions may be enough for many everyday athletes. More experienced and highly conditioned athletes may tolerate three or more, but only after years of progressive preparation. Do not finish every HIIT workout completely exhausted. Paul Laursen recommends ending with the sense that one or two more repetitions were possible. The next workout matters more than destroying yourself today. Consistency is presented as the foundation of successful training. Monitor trends rather than isolated recovery readings. The discussion recommends comparing a seven-day HRV trend with a longer baseline rather than reacting to one unusual day. Muscle status can reveal fatigue that wearables miss. Heaviness, reduced stiffness or elasticity, soreness, and the loss of a fresh “pop” may indicate neuromuscular fatigue. Sub-threshold work may allow greater volume. Training just below the second threshold can provide a strong stimulus with less stress than repeated work above it. Use pace or power during HIIT. Heart rate responds too slowly during short intervals, so it is better reviewed after the session than used as the primary real-time target. Older athletes may require more recovery. The same session can produce a different load response depending on age and individual resilience. Athletes must remain in control of automated plans. Platforms, algorithms, and AI coaches are tools; sessions should still be adjusted when recovery or muscle status is poor. Smart work beats hard work. The episode challenges the “no pain, no gain” mindset and argues that restraint often produces better long-term results. Try Athletica | Adaptive Endurance Training Plans Powered by Sports Science Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#138
July 23 · 49 min
Supplements That Actually Work for Endurance Athletes with Dr Jose Antonio
Dr. Jose Antonio, co-founder and CEO of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, joins Paul Warloski and Paul Laursen to separate effective sports supplements from overhyped products. He explains why protein, creatine, beta-alanine, nitrates, and caffeine form his evidence-backed top five, while also making the case for sodium bicarbonate. The conversation covers practical dosing, protein requirements, creatine for endurance athletes and cognitive health, ineffective testosterone boosters, the placebo effect, probiotics, personalized supplementation, and race-day carbohydrate strategies. Throughout the episode, Antonio advocates a pragmatic approach: identify the athlete’s goal, assess the potential benefit and harm, use the available science, and pay attention to what works in the real world. Key Takeaways Start with the athlete’s goal. A supplement recommendation is only meaningful when tied to a specific performance, recovery, health, or body-composition objective. Antonio’s top five are protein, creatine, beta-alanine, nitrates, and caffeine. Sodium bicarbonate earns an additional place because of its buffering and performance benefits. Caffeine works, but dosage matters. Antonio discusses an effective range of roughly 1–6 mg per kilogram, with approximately 3 mg/kg as a common starting point. Creatine is not just for bodybuilders. It may support recovery and performance in cycling, swimming, paddling, and other sports where body weight is supported. Five grams of creatine per day is generally sufficient for skeletal muscle. Higher doses may be needed to influence cognition, although the evidence is still developing. Distance runners may prefer a lower creatine dose. Antonio suggests that around 2 g per day could provide recovery benefits while limiting unwanted weight gain. Protein should remain high even on rest days. Recovery continues when athletes are not training, so protein intake should not drop dramatically. One gram of protein per pound of body weight is presented as a practical athletic baseline. Higher intake may provide benefits, but affordability and adherence are real constraints. Beetroot-derived nitrates are preferred over arginine. Citrulline may help, but its effective dosing can be inconvenient. Testosterone boosters are among the most overhyped supplements. Tongkat ali and turkesterone have not demonstrated meaningful improvements in lean mass or sustained testosterone elevation in healthy athletes. Belief can affect performance. Antonio describes a caffeine experiment in which participants performed according to the dose they thought they received—even though every dose was a placebo. Practice fueling strategies in training. Whether an athlete uses 30, 60, or 120 grams of carbohydrate per hour, race day should never be the first experiment. Dr. Jose Antonio Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching Marjaana Rakai | Nordic Performance Lab
- Transcript
#137
July 16 · 36 min
Why You Get Sore 48 Hours After Exercise and How to Fix It
Why can a hard workout feel manageable at first, only to leave you struggling with stairs two days later? In this episode of The Athletes Compass Podcast, Paul Warloski and Dr. Paul Laursen explain delayed onset muscle soreness, or DOMS, and the role eccentric muscle contractions play in creating microscopic muscle damage. They explore why downhill running is especially punishing, how the repeated bout effect makes athletes more resilient, and why sport-specific preparation matters even for highly trained athletes. The conversation also covers protein timing, sleep, BCAAs, caffeine, hydration, warm-ups, and practical ways to decide whether soreness is mild enough to train through—or a sign that recovery should take priority. Key Takeaways DOMS usually peaks around 24–72 hours after unfamiliar or demanding exercise. Eccentric contractions—when a muscle lengthens while producing force—are a major trigger for soreness. Downhill running creates particularly high eccentric loading and should be introduced progressively. Soreness is not required for an effective workout and should not be treated as the goal. The repeated bout effect means the body experiences less damage and soreness after repeated exposure to the same movement. Athletes should prepare for the specific mechanical demands of their event, not just its cardiovascular demands. Gentle movement may help mild soreness feel better, but severe soreness requires patience and reduced loading. Total daily protein intake is likely more important than hitting a narrow post-workout “anabolic window.” Sleep supports the repair and adaptation processes that occur after training. Caffeine may reduce the perception of discomfort, but masking soreness can make it easier to overreach. A practical warm-up test can help guide training: if mild soreness improves as you move, the session may be manageable; if it persists or worsens, backing off is prudent. The most important workout is often the next workout, so today’s session should not create more damage than the training plan can absorb. Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
- Transcript
#136
July 9 · 29 min
Why 50% of Girls Quit Sport (and How to Stop It)
In part two of the conversation with Dr. Julia Casadio, the team explores why so many adolescent girls leave sport during their teenage years and how coaches, parents, and support teams can better respond. Julia explains how female puberty affects performance, injury risk, confidence, menstrual health, fueling, and enjoyment, while emphasizing that many girls simply need better education, patience, and practical support. The episode highlights the work of Her Strength, including coach education, menstrual cycle awareness, training load adjustments during growth spurts, and simple nutrition tools such as PFC eating: protein, fat, and carbohydrate at each meal. Key Takeaways Two out of three girls are lost to sport during the teenage years, making adolescence a crucial intervention point. Female puberty can temporarily disrupt performance through growth, changes in body composition, wider hips, injury risk, periods, and hormonal fluctuations. Coaches should avoid treating adolescent girls as smaller versions of boys; their physical and psychological needs can be very different. A rapid growth spurt combined with a sudden training-load increase is a major injury-risk red flag. Menstrual health is a key marker of overall health, not an inconvenience to ignore. Missing periods, severe pain, heavy bleeding, or not having a first period by age 15 should be investigated. Male coaches can still create safe, supportive environments by normalizing conversations and making period products available. When performance plateaus, coaches can shift focus toward skills, strength, nutrition, recovery, and confidence rather than only results. PFC eating — protein, fat, and carbohydrate at each meal — gives young athletes a simple framework for better fueling. Keeping girls in sport requires practical behavior change, not just awareness. Her Strength - Dr. Julia Casadio Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching Marjaana Rakai | Nordic Performance Lab
- Transcript
#135
July 2 · 34 min
Heat Training for Female Athletes: How to Adapt and Perform
In this episode of The Athletes Compass Podcast, Dr. Julia Casadio explains how athletes can use heat training as a powerful performance tool, especially when preparing for hot and humid races. Drawing on her experience with Olympic athletes and her research in applied sport physiology, she explains why women often need longer heat adaptation windows than men, how “thermal memory” allows athletes to reacclimate quickly after an earlier heat block, and why heat should be treated as a meaningful training stress rather than an afterthought. The conversation also covers practical strategies such as sauna or hot-tub exposure, timing heat blocks before race day, managing training load, supporting youth athletes in hot conditions, and recognizing signs of heat illness. Key episode takeaways Female athletes often take longer to adapt to heat than male athletes, with women commonly needing closer to 10–14 days rather than 4–7 days. Heat training should not be added casually to a hard training week. It works best during easy-to-moderate training blocks. Heat is an extra physiological load, so sleep, fueling, hydration, and recovery matter even more during heat exposure. A true heat stimulus requires getting genuinely hot: elevated core temperature and heavy sweating are key signals. Living in a hot place does not automatically mean an athlete is heat-adapted. The body has to experience repeated, meaningful heat stress. Heat blocks can be periodized. Athletes can do a proper block several weeks before an event, then use shorter top-up exposures closer to race day. “Thermal memory” means the body can reacclimate faster after prior heat adaptation. Passive heat methods such as post-exercise sauna or hot-water immersion can help athletes who do not live in hot climates. High-intensity sessions are not ideal for heat loading; easy aerobic sessions are usually safer and more effective. Youth athletes need extra caution in the heat because their cooling systems are less developed and they may be less likely to speak up when something feels wrong. Warning signs of heat illness include dizziness, lightheadedness, cool clammy skin, sudden performance drop-off, fainting, and, in more serious cases, hot red skin. Her Strength - Dr. Julia Casadio Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching Marjaana Rakai | Nordic Performance Lab
- Transcript
#134
June 25 · 53 min
How Sleep Timing Impacts Recovery, HRV, and Endurance Performance
In this episode of The Athletes Compass Podcast, Dr. Kristen Holmes, Global Head of Human Performance at Whoop, explains why sleep-wake consistency may be one of the most powerful yet overlooked drivers of performance, recovery, and long-term health. Drawing from years of athlete and wearable data, she shares how regular sleep timing is linked to better physiology, improved resilience, and stronger performance outcomes across sports. The conversation also covers practical circadian habits, including morning light, moderate exercise, breathwork, and time-restricted eating, plus strategies for athletes racing early, parents navigating broken sleep, and women experiencing perimenopause or menopause. Key episode takeaways Sleep-wake consistency may be more predictive of performance than many athletes realize. Even Division I athletes may show declines in resting physiology with as little as 45 minutes of sleep timing variability. Sleep consistency helps drive sleep quality, restoration, and autonomic robustness. Four free habits can support better sleep consistency: morning natural light, moderate activity, slow-paced breathing, and time-restricted eating. Low-to-moderate intensity exercise can act as a recovery-promoting tool, while high-intensity work should be used strategically. Breathwork after stress can help prevent stress from accumulating across the day and disrupting sleep onset. Eating most calories during daylight hours may support circadian alignment and reduce competition between digestion and sleep. For early races or travel, athletes can “bank resilience” by staying consistent in the days and weeks before disruption. Parents with young children should treat poor sleep as a temporary phase, use strategic naps, protect early-night sleep, and avoid bright light during night wakings. Fitness appears protective across many contexts, including shift work, menopause symptoms, and general resilience. Four core circadian behaviors that improve cardiorespiratory fitness through consistent sleep Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching Marjaana Rakai | Nordic Performance Lab
- Transcript
#133
June 18 · 32 min
System Engagement Explained: How Much Is Left in the Tank?
In this episode of The Athletes Compass, Paul Warloski, Dr. Paul Laursen, and Marjaana Rakai explain Athletica’s Workout Reserve and the new Systems Engagement feature. Workout Reserve is described as a battery-like metric that shows how close an athlete is to their historical best across different durations, from short sprint efforts to long aerobic performances. The team discusses how athletes can use it in real time through Velocity or Garmin, how negative values can signal breakthrough efforts, and why good historical data is essential. They also explain how Systems Engagement helps athletes and coaches see which physiological systems were stressed in a workout or race, making it easier to reverse engineer training toward the actual demands of an event. Key episode takeaways Workout Reserve acts like a “battery” showing how much capacity an athlete has left relative to their recent historical bests. A value near 100% suggests the athlete is fresh relative to that effort, while 0% means they are approaching a known personal limit. Negative values indicate new, uncharted territory. Workout Reserve can be viewed retrospectively in Athletica, live in Velocity sessions, or through the Garmin Workout Reserve data field. Systems Engagement shows which energy systems were stressed during a workout or selected segment, such as neuromuscular sprint, anaerobic, VO2 max, threshold, or aerobic systems. A 30/30 interval session may engage both VO2 max and threshold systems, which matches the expected training adaptations. The tool is most useful when athletes have enough valid historical data, including power or pace tests such as FTP tests, 5K tests, or sport-specific calibration sessions. Workout Reserve and Systems Engagement are based on external load, such as pace or power, not internal load measures like heart rate, lactate, or RPE. Coaches can use Systems Engagement to check whether an athlete actually trained the intended system. Race analysis can help athletes identify which physiological systems were most taxed, then design training to target those demands. Not every session should push Workout Reserve to zero or negative; easy aerobic sessions still have a purpose. How a ProTour cycling coach uses Athletica Workout Reserve Workout Reserve: A New Way to Understand Performance with Dr. Andrea Zignoli Scientific Paper in Sports Engineering Race Analysis - Volta Valenciana Garmin Connect IQ | Home Train and Race with WR on Garmin Athletica Workout Reserve | Home Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching Marjaana Rakai | Nordic Performance Lab
- Transcript
#132
June 11 · 57 min
Can You Be a Mom, Work Full-Time, and Train for an Ironman? with Dr. Iris Nafshi
In this episode of The Athletes Compass Podcast, Dr. Iris Nafshi joins the team to discuss her research on “Iron Moms,” endurance athletes who train for Ironman while navigating motherhood, work, family expectations, and guilt. Drawing from her PhD dissertation, Beyond Grit and Guilt, Iris explains that athletic identity does not compete with maternal identity; it can expand it. The conversation explores how moms persist through complex schedules, emotional pressure, limited support, and societal expectations by reframing guilt, building systems, practicing self-compassion, and embracing the mindset that “something is better than nothing.” Key Takeaways Athletic identity and maternal identity do not have to be separate or competing roles. “Balance” may be the wrong word; integration and seasons of focus are more realistic. Mom guilt often comes from societal expectations that mothers should be endlessly selfless. Many Iron Moms reframe training as role modeling strength, commitment, and self-respect for their children. Grit helps athletes start, but it is not enough to sustain long-term training through real life. Iris adds self-compassion to the HERO framework — hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism — creating “SHIRO.” Support systems matter. As Iris says, nobody does Ironman alone. Flexibility is essential: shortening a workout, moving it, or doing something imperfectly is often better than skipping entirely. “Something is better than nothing” becomes a powerful mindset for training, work, creativity, and life. Children are watching, and they often notice the dreams parents pursue — and the ones they give up. Dr. Iris Nafshi Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching Marjaana Rakai | Nordic Performance Lab
- Transcript
#131
June 4 · 52 min
A Stoic Philosopher's Guide to Endurance Training with Dr William Irvine
In this episode of The Athletes Compass, Dr. William B. Irvine joins Paul Warloski, Paul Laursen, and Marjaana Rakai to explore how Stoic philosophy can help endurance athletes train, race, and live with more resilience. Irvine connects rowing, coaching, discomfort, failure, and competition to practical Stoic ideas such as focusing on what you can control, reframing setbacks, practicing negative visualization, and valuing process over outcomes. The conversation moves from “keep your head in the boat” to “one more stroke,” offering athletes a grounded mental toolkit for handling race-day adversity, physical discomfort, self-doubt, and the temptation to tie self-worth to results. Key Takeaways “Keep your head in the boat” is a powerful Stoic metaphor: focus on what you can control, not the weather, competitors, or external conditions. Irvine’s practical Stoic advice: “Do what you can with what you’ve got where you are.” Athletes can reframe setbacks as “Stoic tests” rather than disasters. Discomfort and pain are not the same; endurance athletes learn to tolerate discomfort as part of growth. “One more stroke” is a simple mental strategy for surviving hard moments in training, racing, illness, or life. Failure is valuable when it comes from attempting something difficult and learning from the result. Competitive athletes can stay healthier mentally by focusing on process goals rather than outcome goals. Negative visualization helps athletes appreciate what they already have and prepare for what could go wrong. Last-time meditation can deepen gratitude: every race, ride, row, or run may someday be the last. Stoicism is not about suppressing emotion; it is about maintaining equanimity when life or sport gets hard. More Better Thinking | Dr. William B. Irvine Join the Athletica 5K Virtual Race Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching Marjaana Rakai | Nordic Performance Lab
- Transcript
#130
May 28 · 35 min
Power & Pace Profiles: What Every Endurance Athlete Should Know
In this episode of The Athletes Compass Podcast, Paul Warloski, Dr. Paul Laursen, and Marjaana Rakai break down the concept of power and pace profiles — the personalized performance fingerprints hidden inside your training data. They explain how these profiles reveal an athlete’s strengths, weaknesses, critical power, and sustainable race pace without expensive lab testing. The conversation explores how Athletica uses real-world wearable data and AI coaching to prescribe training zones, assess race readiness, and predict event performance. From marathon pacing to hill-specific preparation and anaerobic profiling, the episode offers practical guidance for endurance athletes looking to train smarter and race more effectively. Key Takeaways A power or pace profile maps your best efforts across different durations and acts as a “performance fingerprint.” Critical power and critical pace help determine sustainable race intensity and training zones. Real-world wearable data may be more valuable than isolated lab testing because it reflects actual training environments. Athletica uses historical performance data to estimate physiological markers like VO2 max and threshold power. Accurate profiling requires maximal efforts across multiple durations — “garbage in, garbage out.” Profiles can reveal whether an athlete is more “twitchy” (explosive) or “diesel” (endurance-focused). AI coaching can analyze historical workouts and race-specific sessions to estimate realistic race pacing. Race specificity matters: athletes should train in terrain and conditions similar to their target event. Weekly training consistency and frequency may matter more than one extremely long workout. Monitoring threshold trends over time provides insight into long-term fitness progression. Join the Athletica 5K Virtual Race Dr. Paul Laursen Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching Marjaana Rakai | Nordic Performance Lab
- Transcript

Showing 1–20 of 28 episodes