Skip to content
Sign in
Artwork for Dr. John Campbell
EducationHealth & FitnessMedicine

Dr. John Campbell

Campbellteaching

Hello Everyone, My name is John Campbell and I am a retired Nurse Teacher and former clinical nurse based in England. I also do some teaching in Asia and Africa when time permits. These videos are to help students to learn the background to all forms of health care. My PhD focused on the development of open learning resources for nurses nationally and internationally. LinkedIn profile, https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-john-campbell-5256223b/ Twitter, https://twitter.com/Johnincarlisle Disclaimer; These media including videos, book, e book, articles, podcasts are not peer-reviewed. They should never replace individual clinical judgement from your own health care provider. No media-based material on this channel is suitable for using as professional medical advice. All comments are also for educational purposed only and must never replace advice from your own health care provider

Play
Open in
  • 808 episodes
  • daily
  • Avg 24 min
  • English

Episodes 808

NewestOldestLongest
All20Unplayed20In progress0Played0
Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.
  • Today · 1 hr 23 min

    Mast cell activation disease

    Dr Tina Peers is a physician with a special interest in menopause, an inflammatory condition called mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) and chronic fatigue. In this video Dr. Peers presents information that indicates MCAS is much more common than most doctors believe. She follows principles agreed by the key workers and opinion leaders in the MCAS field. This allows Dr. peers to practice treatment strategies that can transform many lives for the better. Dr. Peers has also recently been treating people after covid vaccine injury. Consensus 1 and 2 discussion: Dr Afrin and Dr Dempsey. https://drtaniadempsey.com/dr-lawrence-afrin-on-mcas-diagnostic-criteria-consensus-2/ Dr Lawrence Afrin explaining MCAS with Dr Mobeen Syed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX6uZKInI7c&t=669s Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Today · 26 min

    Risks following infection versus vaccination

    UK, (England), Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after covid-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: self-controlled case series study Uploaded 02-09-21 https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1931 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-58347434 Prof Julia Hippisley-Cox People vaccinated with first doses, 16 or over N = 29,121,633 Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) N = 19,608,008 Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2mRNA) N = 9,513,625 People testing positive SARSCoV-2 N = 1,758,095 Within 28 days of three exposures First dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine First dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine SARS-CoV-2 positive test For every 10 million people vaccinated with the AstraZeneca An extra 107 would be hospitalised or die from thrombocytopenia (1 in 93,459) 9 times lower than the risk following an infection An extra 66 would be hospitalised or die from blood clots in the veins Nearly 200 times lower than the risk following an infection For every 10 million people vaccinated with the Pfizer An extra 143 extra strokes would be seen (1 in 69,930) 12 times lower than the risk following an infection Myocarditis and pericarditis Chest pain, shortness of breath, or feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-june-25-2021 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7027e2.htm 52 million doses to 12–29 years 1,226 reports of myocarditis after mRNA vaccination 42,414 One in 42,414 Data demonstrate increased risks, particularly within the seven days following the second dose The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age compared to females and older males Risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Today · 20 min

    BBC and vitamin D

    33% reduction in hospitalization with acute respiratory infections, (upper and lower) Uploaded 29-01-26 Covid Influenza Bronchitis Pneumonia Prostate cancer, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, cancer treatments, dementia, diabetes type 2, metabolic syndrome, obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, all infections, covid, TB, low mood, Alzheimer’s Parkinson’s, MSK pains and problems, osteoporosis, MS, RA, SLE, DM1, Crohn’s, psoriasis, eczema, hypertension, CAD, heart failure, stroke, preeclampsia Vitamin D deficiency linked to hospital admissions https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czx3g1d57xpo University of Surrey People with a severe vitamin D deficiency (below 15 nmol/L), a third more likely to be admitted to hospital with conditions including bronchitis and pneumonia. (15 nmol/L is 6 ng / ml) Abi Bournot, (lead author) "antibacterial and antiviral properties" of vitamin D are thought to help reduce the risk of respiratory tract infections." Improves immune recognition Supports T and B cell response Reduces excessive pro-inflammatory cytokines Promotes production of antimicrobial peptides against bacterial infections. Enhances antiviral white cell function, e.g. promotes interferon reserves "This research attaches hard data to support the theory. "Despite its importance to our overall health, many people are deficient and do not meet the government's recommended intake of 10 microgrammes of vitamin D per day." (10 micrograms is 400 iu) NHS data from 36,258 people. (40 to 69) For each 10 nmol/l (4 ng / ml) increase in vitamin D, the hospital admission rate for respiratory tract infections fell by 4%. Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status and respiratory tract infections requiring hospital admission: unmatched case-control analysis of ethnic groups from the United Kingdom Biobank cohort https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0002916525007713?via%3Dihub Background Vitamin D status has been found to be inversely associated with risk of respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Methods An unmatched case-control study (Observational, cases are not individually matched on specific characteristics) Data from United Kingdom Biobank Includes 500k adults with serum 25(OH)D status and hospital episodes N = 36,258, n = 27,872 Results 34% were White 28% Asian 19% Black 11% other 7% of mixed ethnicity. RTI rate was 8.5% (median time to RTI, 14.8 y) Each 25(OH)D +10 nmol/L increase) was significantly associated with a 4% lower hazard ratio (HR) for RTI hospitalization. (So difference between 15 nmol/L and 65 nmol/L would be 50% reduction) less than15 nmol/L v more than 75 nmol/L 33% reduction in hospitalization with acute respiratory infections Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Today · 23 min

    Most colds non-covid

    If you have a cold I the UK just now it is much more likely to be caused by a non-covid virus. Uploaded 29-09-22 UK, Zoe health study data https://health-study.joinzoe.com/your-contribution New symptomatic cases today = 184,293 People currently symptomatic with covid = 2,116,791 Current UK prevalence is 1 in 31 Big Diet Study (check your e mail) (food frequency questionnaire, invite by e mail) Intermittent Fasting Study ONS latest UK, 7 September 2021 to 14 September 2022 (Estimated percentage of the population testing positive for coronavirus (COVID-19) on nose and throat swabs) 1.41% in England (1 in 70 people) 1.31% in Wales (1 in 75 people) 1.25% in Northern Ireland (1 in 80 people) 1.88% in Scotland (1 in 55 people) Lower perveance than Zoe data Probably because a larger percentage of cases are asymptomatic, And, ONS numbers will be higher next week Percentage of patients in acute hospitals with confirmed COVID-19 who are being treated primarily for COVID-19 (English regions, 18 June 2021 to 31 August 2022) Self-reported long COVID as of 31 July 2022 2.0 million (3.1% of the population) Of those 83% symptoms at least 12 weeks 45% symptoms at least one yea 22% symptoms at least two years Symptoms Fatigue, 62% SOB, 37% Difficulty concentrating, 33% Muscle ache, 31% Symptoms adversely affected the day-to-day activities, 1.5 million (73% of those with self-reported long COVID)  UK government covid data https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk Last 7 days Cases, up 42% Deaths, 339, down 2.3% Patients admitted, 5,930, up 47.7% At 39% = 2,312 admitted for covid Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Today · 14 min

    Do not resuscitate protocols

    Unnecessary deaths are a tragedy in themselves, but also distorted the covid fatality data. Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj Dave, independent researcher, https://biologyphenom.substack.com https://twitter.com/biologyphenom Witness statements: Gilliant Grant- https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0142-000002.pdf I was provided with a document at a meeting I had with one of the solicitors. The document was the DNR but this had my name written on it. I was shocked as this was the first time I had seen this document and did not even know it existed. I had never had any sight of this document before meeting with the solicitor. Initially it was thought a DNR document had been signed by my mum. This is incorrect. There is no signed DNR by my mum. The DNR had my name on it. I had never given permission for the DNR and I am very shocked and upset that this has my name on it. I do not understand it. The DNR is incomplete. The first part of the DNR asked if the patient authorises the DNR. This part had been left blank. The next part asks if the welfare attorney/ guardian authorises this and has my name written next to it but it is not dated. The part below that is signed by the GP and is dated for 2 November 2020. On this date my gran was showing only very mild signs of COVID symptoms. My gran suffered from mild dementia but had enough capacity to make her own decisions. I was asked about a DNR but categorically stated that I was not prepared to make any decision on a DNR if she was not critically ill and I knew she could make these decisions for herself. I was very clear and strongly worded on this with the care home. I think this conversation happened on the 2 of November 2020 and this is the date of the DNR. I think this is very important to include because I am shocked that this document exists as I had no knowledge of this before being presented with it and I had never authorised a DNR but this has my name on it. I would be happy for the inquiry to be provided with a copy of the DNR. It was also stated on these records that we did not wish her to go to hospital and this was also untrue. I stated on several occasions that if she deteriorated I wanted her to go to hospital immediately. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Today · 32 min

    Zoe data with Professor Spector

    The report and the data files can be downloaded from this link https://console.cloud.google.com/storage/browser/covid-public-data. Uploaded 20-10-22 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Today · 14 min

    Ovulation and implantation

    With Professor Robert Clancy. The point is, this is testable. Uploaded 15-02-25 Link to Quadrant, https://quadrant.org.au/news-opinions/uncategorized/after-covid-now-its-the-lawyers-turn/ Monovalent mRNA XBB.1.5 vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalization in Quebec, Canada: impact of variant replacement and waning protection during 10-month follow-up https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.13.24317190v1 Protection Conferred by COVID-19 Vaccination, Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection, or Hybrid Immunity Against Omicron-Associated Severe Outcomes Among Community-Dwelling Adults https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/78/5/1372/7450138 Comparing frequency of booster vaccination to prevent severe COVID-19 by risk group in the United States https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45549-9 Two-Dose Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccine Effectiveness With Mixed Schedules and Extended Dosing Intervals: Test-Negative Design Studies From British Columbia and Quebec, Canada https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/75/11/1980/6570607 COVID-19 mRNA VACCINES: THE PROBLEM THAT WON’T GO AWAY. Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy AM This month we ‘celebrate’ 5 years since the covid pandemic began in Australia. This is the 10th article I have written for Quadrant on covid pandemic management. Prior to the pandemic my 300+ publications had been in peer reviewed medical journals. Most reported research on airway immune protection which has been my passion for 50 years. In 2019 the University of Newcastle awarded me a Doctor of Science for this work (I was informed that this was the first such award given by the University). My point is that in 2020 with the appearance of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus causing Covid-19), entirely by circumstance, I was as well placed as anyone to understand this new airway infection, its pathogenesis and its management. Specifically, the likely place for vaccination in the control of the pandemic. That is what I did. So, why write 10 articles for Quadrant that were critical of the official response to the pandemic? The answer is a simple one. Everything I had understood about the history of pandemics, the science-based development of an Australian Pandemic Plan, the immunology of mucosal (airway) infections, and the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship, had been summarily replaced with a narrative centred on a genetic vaccine that had never been used in man, and that did not exist. At this stage the medical press that I had worked with for 50 years had been bought by the narrative and would publish nothing that threatened to compromise it. The legacy press (including its ‘experts’) wore ignorance on a grubby sleeve. But these were the prisms through which medical professionals and the public would learn about the pandemic to inform decisions that affected their patient’s, and their own, health. The narrative made no sense to me. It denied historic experience. It was confused with inherent dangers by neglecting what could be done, while failing to anticipate what might happen. The official Australian Pandemic Plan had been updated in 2019 for an anticipated influenza pandemic. This was modified to cover the new SARS-CoV-2 pandemic early in 2020. Experience with influenza was considered an appropriate model for a pandemic involving a corona virus mutant. How did this narrative conflict with the Plan it replaced? First, it ignored the lessons of epidemiology and science. The corollary was the punitive lockdowns and senseless vaccine mandates. Second, it denied the use of safe, cheap and effective repurposed drugs, decisions that contributed to needless loss of life amongst the most vulnerable. Third and at its centre, it distorted views regarding what could be expected as clinical outcomes of a global mRNA vaccination programme, while minimising concerns an untested genetic vaccine m Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Today · 24 min

    Important scientific information with Dr. Pieter Gaillard and John

    Direct link to Pieter’s article with references https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/astrazeneca-vaccine-pull-back-push-through-pieter-j-gaillard/?trk=pulse-article_more-articles_related-content-card Link to Pieter's brain vasculature video from his picture I the background, amazing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9y3AXr8EyG8 Video on Pieter's scientific work https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0o-b5JK9bA Uploaded 16-10-21 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Yesterday · 25 min

    NIH and ivermectin

    HIH, Table 2e. Characteristics of Antiviral Agents That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19 Uploaded 18-10-21 https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/tables/table-2e/ https://www.cms.gov/medicare/covid-19/new-covid-19-treatments-add-payment-nctap FDA live https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19 NIH live https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/ Adults: Dosing Regimens The dose most commonly used in clinical trials is IVM 0.2–0.6 mg/kg PO given as a single dose or as a once-daily dose for up to 5 days. Adverse events Generally well tolerated Dizziness Pruritis GI effects (e.g., nausea, diarrhea) Neurological AEs have been reported when IVM has been used to treat parasitic diseases, but it is not clear whether these AEs were caused by IVM or the underlying conditions. Comments and links to clinical trials Generally given on an empty stomach with water; however, administering IVM with food increases its bioavailability. A list of clinical trials is available here: Ivermectin Russia Deaths, https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/region/russia https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/russia-covid-count-fake-statistics/2021/10/16/b9d47058-277f-11ec-8739-5cb6aba30a30_story.html Independent demographer Alexey Raksha Using data from Rosstat, Russia’s statistical agency https://eng.rosstat.gov.ru/folder/11335 Excess mortality, around 750,000 https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/10/08/russias-coronavirus-excess-death-toll-hits-660k-a75254 Excess mortality, around 660,000 Tracking cases around the world Officials manipulated statistics and underplayed the crisis China, Turkey https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/world-health-organization-china-not-sharing-data-on-health-care-worker-coronavirus-infections/2020/02/26/28064fda-54e4-11ea-80ce-37a8d4266c09_story.html Alexei Kouprianov, independent analyst and biologist The data for [Russia] is absolutely unreliable Recently ex St. Petersburg campus of the Higher School of Economics (September 2020) Handling of the pandemic, largely left to the regions Regional officials conceal problems, fear of losing their posts Therefore critics, even analytical experts, are sidelined Iceland restricts Moderna https://www.landlaeknir.is/um-embaettid/frettir/frett/item47722/Aframhaldandi-notkun-COVID-19-boluefnis-Moderna-a-Islandi https://www.icelandreview.com/society/covid-19-in-iceland-moderna-vaccine-used-for-60/ https://www.icelandreview.com/news/moderna-use-on-pause-in-iceland/ Chief Epidemiologist, Þórólfur Guðnason Moderna, only be used for booster shots in 60+ Unpublished data from the Nordic countries indicate that the risk of cardiac inflammation after vaccination against COVID-19 is much higher among 18 to 39-year-olds if the Moderna vaccine is used than after vaccination with the Pfizer vaccine Cardiac inflammation after vaccination is much less common among older demographics In 12 to 17-year-olds, lack of European data Under 60 who have received a single shot of Modern, to complete their vaccination with Pfizer Men 18-39 are not recommended to accept the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine Iceland data, vast majority of vaccination side effects emerge shortly after vaccination Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Yesterday · 27 min

    Booster do work

    Booster doses probably needed by most people, unfortunately. Uploaded 04-11-21 https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#covidnet-hospitalizations-vaccination US, 20.6 million so far https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/booster-shot.html Six months after 2nd shot 65 years and older 50–64 years with underlying medical conditions 18 – 64 years, working / living in high-risk settings 18 years and older, 2 months Johnson and Johnson/Janssen Protection of BNT162b2 Vaccine Booster against Covid-19 in Israel (NEJM, October 2021) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.27.21262679v1 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2114255? July 30, 2021, over 602 Third (booster) dose of the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine was approved 60 years or older who had been fully vaccinated August 29th, anyone over 12 At least five months previously N = 1,144,690 2 dynamic cohorts 2 vaccines only N = 5.2 million person days 4,439 confirmed infections 294 cases of severe covid (based on 4.6 million person days) 2 vaccines + booster N = 10.6 million person days 934 confirmed infections 29 cases of severe COVID-19 (based on 6.3 million person days) (despite older demographic) Twelve days or more after the booster dose Increases antibody neutralization levels ~10-fold compared to after 2nd dose 11.3 fold decrease in the relative risk of confirmed infection Efficacy among booster recipients to approximately 95% (May have waned to 50% with time and delta variant) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262423v1 19.5 fold decrease in the relative risk of severe illness Factor reduction in reduced rate of confirmed infection in boosted versus none-boosted In conjunction with safety reports this study demonstrates the effectiveness of a third vaccine dose, in both reducing transmission and severe disease, indicates the great potential of curtailing the Delta variant resurgence by administering booster shots Decline in immunity, UK data https://www.gov.uk/government/news/over-eight-million-people-in-the-uk-receive-covid-19-booster-jabs Protection against symptomatic disease, Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine 65%, up to 3 months after the second dose 45% 6 months after the second dose Protection against symptomatic disease, Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine 90% up to 3 months after 2nd dose 65% 6 months after the second dose Protection against hospitalisation, Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine 95% at 3 months 75% at 6 months Protection against hospitalisation, Pfizer/BioNTech 99% at 3 months 90% at 6 months Why this is important A small change can generate a major shift in hospital admissions A change from 95% to 90% against hospitalisation would lead to doubling of admissions in those vaccinated Early UK booster results from Pfizer Booster restores protection back up to 95.6% against symptomatic infection Booster doses, Situation in UK https://www.gov.uk/government/news/over-eight-million-people-in-the-uk-receive-covid-19-booster-jabs 8,115,229 boosted so far https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-vaccination/coronavirus-booster-vaccine/ Booster vaccine doses, available on the NHS People most at risk from COVID-19, who have had a 2nd dose of a vaccine at least 6 months ago (after 5 months for high risk groups) This includes: Aged 50 and over Frontline health / care workers 16 and over with a health condition 16 and over, carers or live with venerable people Pregnant women in eligible groups COVID-19 booster vaccine and flu vaccine If you are offered both vaccines, it's safe to have them at the same time. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Yesterday · 12 min

    Vaccine warnings overlooked

    Professor Paul Goddard and Professor Angus Dalgleish. Profiteering from Doom, Clinical Press, https://www.clinicalpress.co.uk/products/profiteering-from-doom-just-follow-the-money https://gazellebookservices.co.uk/products/9781854571427 https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0FWRRWTRH Death of Science, https://www.clinicalpress.co.uk/products/the-death-of-science https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/The-Death-of-Science-by-Paul-R-Goddard-editor-A-G-Dalgleish-editor/9781854571137 https://www.amazon.co.uk/Death-Science-retreat-reason-post-modern/dp/1854571133 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Yesterday · 18 min

    Excess deaths 2025

    Excess mortality: Deaths from all causes compared to average over previous years Uploaded 28-05-25 https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282 1 January 2020 until 31 December 2022 47 countries of the Western World, 3, 098, 456 Excess mortality 2021, 42 countries 2022, 43 countries Conclusions Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality. 2015–2019 compared to 2020–2024 Percentage difference between the reported weekly or monthly deaths in 2020–2024 and the average deaths in the same period in 2015–2019 https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-average-baseline Correlation and causality Smoking is correlated with lung cancer Asbestos exposure is correlated with mesothelioma Alcohol consumption is associated with liver cirrhosis Obesity is correlated with high sugar intake Radiation exposure is correlated with cancer Dioxin exposure is correlated with cancer Causality may be adjudicated by larger scale associations, consistent between countries, where other explanations are unlikely, where effect follows cause, where greater exposure causes more harm with a plausible biological mechanism with coherence between bench science and epidemiological data supported by (even limited) experimentation. By analogy to other causes of harm and sometimes by reversibility. https://drjohncampbell.co.uk/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Yesterday · 24 min

    Long list of side effects to look out for

    The Complete List of the Pfizer Adverse Events of Special Interest Uploaded 11-03-22 Link to Wefwafwa's original video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1JO0kl3RYk and channel, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzsLklGgOttU3Se-WGLp7ow Please suscribe to Wefwafwa@s channel to spport the community health work in Uganda https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf https://drjessesantiano.com/the-complete-list-of-the-pfizer-adverse-events-of-special-interest/ Ivermectin study apparently withdrawn https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221009887 The researchers and experts told The Associated Press that the findings are no longer relevant. https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-136056839408 Another retraction example https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext Adverse Event of Special Interest is an event for a particular product that should be monitored by a drug or vaccine manufacturing company. It can be severe or non-serious, but it can lead to a serious medical condition. According to the CIOMS Working Group VII https://cioms.ch The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), international, non-governmental, non-profit organization established jointly by WHO and UNESCO in 1949. Such events should be described in protocols or protocol amendments, and instruction provided for investigators as to how and when they should be reported to the sponsor. The original Pzifer appendix is a wall of words with the diagnoses separated by semi-colons. More than 95% of the adverse events listed are life-changing. (for the bad) If you are lucky enough to have a diagnosis from your doctors and say it is not related to the shot, show this list to them. Tell them that Pfizer is watching out for those complications. Many doctors, nurse practitioners, or physician assistants don’t know. I didn’t until I read the whole list. Many of the conditions below are rare. That means a doctor may not have seen that condition before or might have forgotten about them from medical school. Rare also means there may be no standardized treatment for them. The diagnosis on the list does not mean they always happen with the COVID-19 shots, but anyone who got “vaccinated” and then diagnosed with the illnesses below should be reported to Pfizer or the VAERS. The diagnosis may be months or years after the shots. You can still report them. The World Health Organization is also keeping an eye on the AESIs. AESI monitoring determines if there is a higher incidence of specific diseases in people who had the COVID shots. If the incidence is higher in people who had the shots, they should stop using these “vaccines”. That is if they do their job. This list may be from Pfizer, but ALL WHO HAD THE COVID SHOTS WHATEVER THE MANUFACTURER SHOULD REPORT THEIR DIAGNOSIS. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Yesterday · 55 min

    WHO: warning to world leaders

    James Roguski, TO ALL WORLD LEADERS: There are many additional reasons for all 196 parties to the IHR to reject the 2024 IHR amendments: For complete details, visit: https://RejectTheAmendments.com https://substack.com/@jamesroguski Uploaded 08-07-25 I strongly encourage you to formally exercise your authority under Article 61 of the International Health Regulations and IMMEDIATELY notify the World Health Organization that you have decided to REJECT the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations on behalf of the people of your nation. July 19, 2025 is the deadline for heads of state of the 192 of the 196 nations that are parties to the International Health Regulation to reject the 2024 amendments. Because 4 nations (The Islamic Republic of Iran, Netherlands, New Zealand and Slovakia) rejected the 2022 amendments to the IHR (which shortened the time period to reject future amendments from 18 to 10 months), the deadline for these 4 nations to reject the 2024 amendments is March 19, 2026. Amendments to the International Health Regulations https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA77/A77_ACONF14-en.pdf Article 1 “pandemic emergency” means... a public health emergency of international concern that is caused by a communicable disease and: (i) has, or is at high risk of having, wide geographical spread to and within multiple States; and (ii) is exceeding, or is at high risk of exceeding, the capacity of health systems to respond in those States; and (iii) is causing, or is at high risk of causing, substantial social and/or economic disruption, including disruption to international traffic and trade; and (iv) requires rapid, equitable and enhanced coordinated international action, with whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches. “relevant health products” means those health products needed to respond to public health emergencies of international concern, including pandemic emergencies, which may include: • medicines, • vaccines, • diagnostics, • medical devices, • vector control products, • personal protective equipment, • decontamination products, • assistive products, • antidotes, • cell- and gene-based therapies, • and other health technologies; HOW MUCH IS THIS GOING TO COST? (Article 44) Dear President Trump, On the very first day of your Presidency (January 20, 2025) you signed Executive Order 14155 which began the 1-year process of having the United States terminate its membership in the World Health Organization. Sec. 4. Global System Negotiations. While withdrawal is in progress, the Secretary of State will cease negotiations on the WHO Pandemic Agreement and the amendments to the International Health Regulations, and actions taken to effectuate such agreement and amendments will have no binding force on the United States. HOWEVER, YOU HAVE NOT YET OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION THAT YOU WISH TO REJECT THE 2024 AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS. PLEASE TAKE OFFICIAL ACTION TO FORMALLY AND PUBLICLY REJECT THE 2024 AMENDMENTS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BEFORE THE JULY 19, 2025 DEADLINE AND ENCOURAGE OUR ALLIES TO JOIN YOU IN THIS ACTION. Also, on February 4, 2025 you signed Executive Order #14199 which directed the State Department to conduct a review of “all conventions and treaties to which the United States is a party.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/withdrawing-the-united-states-from-and-ending-funding-to-certain-united-nations-organizations-and-reviewing-united-states-support-to-all-international-organizations/ The deadline for the above review is August 3, 2025 (180 days after February 4, 2025). Unfortunately the deadline to reject the 2024 amendments to the IHR (July 19, 2025) will pass before the State Department is obligated to deliver their report to you. I humbly Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Yesterday · 20 min

    Is global vaccination still required?

    Probably not Uploaded 26-04-22 Direct link to featured report and channel, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9YfCjRyKnY https://www.youtube.com/c/WefwafwaAndrew https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/23/health/covid-vaccines-world-africa.html WHO, fully vaccinate 70% in every country by June 2022 African Union also wants 70% At 70% Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia Nepal Most others under 20% Dr. Seth Berkley, chief executive Gavi, Covax This pandemic is not over yet — far from it — and it’s imperative that countries use the doses available to them to protect as much of their population as possible Gavi, secured $4.8 billion Africa’s vaccination rate Fewer than 17% have received a primary immunization Last month, vaccinations down 35% in Arica Dr. Isaac Adewole, Nigeria, Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Would like 70% There was a time people were very desperate to get vaccinated, but the vaccines were not there. And then they realized that without the vaccination, they didn’t die White House, global covid summit in May, hopes for renewed funding Democratic Republic of Congo Covid death rate very low Surge in measles threatening 20 million children Christopher Mambula, Doctors Without Border, East Africa DRC government cannot spare resources for supplementary measles vaccinations Serum Institute of India Stopped producing covid vaccines last December Before omicron At least 66% of Africans already infected Shabir Madhi, professor, University of the Witwatersrand There’s very little value to it. In fact, we will gain much more by getting to more than 90% above the age of 50 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Yesterday · 57 min

    Cut dementia risk

    Take the free cognitive function test yourself, foodforthebrain.org Direct order for Patrick's book Upgrade Your brain, https://foodforthebrain.org/product/upgrade-your-brain-book-preorder/ Amazon link for the book for people outside of the UK, https://www.amazon.co.uk/Upgrade-Your-Brain-Unlock-Potential/dp/0008661200?crid=31ZSV4O2RLSZP&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.TQCWZQW06kHFWQKwo5iRI2IxK8N0jqHbvIH0M4RoXWHBV7I7dcEmxFhLDMTt3sVg0klSKQ7zb_--xje-F8T7OYxnnnkY3XNCKPS0asRb50IqqtaUjaorcyaR2ovSBQjn9OapQ-Vs5g6n8e1w3j7Iy7mhimPWRTc8oon9JFYXEN42ewMqtVyotjrjSl_iwBPT9Yv8y_BTjBU0AwrnmNZlC4I4uKVLmFIe9wbpMzmkDB4.7PPF8_cw_7l7wc81AMKISHxUGvDsOy5geU3O8JBvMf0&dib_tag=se&keywords=upgrade+your+brain+patrick+holford&qid=1716986254&s=instant-video&sprefix=upgrade+your+brain+patrick+holford,instant-video,69&sr=1-1&linkCode=sl1&tag=foodfortheb01-21&linkId=8de770776f3cdc5a00b10bcd0467db98&language=en_GB&ref_=as_li_ss_tl 00:00 - Introduction of Patrick Holford 01:30 - Discussion on dementia, its prevalence, and fear associated with it 03:30 - Dementia and nutrition: Introduction to the concept 04:50 - Alzheimer’s disease and its preventability 05:50 - Four biological drivers of brain breakdown: sugar, brain fats, B vitamins, antioxidants 08:50 - The role of fish consumption and omega-3 fatty acids 13:00 - Omega-3 index and its significance for brain health 16:50 - Case study of a man with mixed dementia improving through dietary changes 20:20 - Importance of specific types of fish and omega-3 sources 23:10 - Algae-based DHA supplements for vegetarians and vegans 26:50 - The role of B vitamins and methylation in brain health 35:50 - Combination of B vitamins and omega-3s to prevent brain shrinkage 40:00 - Impact of sugar and insulin resistance on brain health 49:30 - Importance of antioxidants in brain health 54:00 - The role of vitamin D in reducing dementia risk Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Yesterday · 7 min

    Serious DNA contamination

    DNA contamination clearly identified by Dr David Speicher Uploaded 11-03-25 An Injection of Truth. Healing Humanity. https://aninjectionoftruth.ca/ The David Declaration https://thedaviddeclaration.org/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Yesterday · 38 min

    Child deaths

    If you would like to donate to the work in Uganda, 100% of donations go directly to the project, we currently spend 0% on admin. https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=XS59XPZ527YFL Uploaded 24-06-25 Link to Wefwafwa’s youtube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@UCzsLklGgOttU3Se-WGLp7ow Link to our organization's website: https://buwanga.org/ To contact Wefwafwa directly, wefandrew@gmail.com or WhatsApp+256756320736 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Yesterday · 22 min

    DNA and Florida

    Tallahassee, Fla. State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo Uploaded 10-01-24 The Surgeon General outlined concerns regarding nucleic acid contaminants Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, Lipid nanoparticles …. may therefore be an equally efficient vehicle for delivering contaminant DNA into human cells. The presence of SV40 promoter/enhancer DNA may also pose a unique and heightened risk of DNA integration into human cells. 2007, FDA published guidance on regulatory limits for DNA vaccines https://www.fda.gov/media/73667/download?utm_source=floridahealth.gov&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=PressRelease&utm_content=Florida%27s_Future_Budget&url_trace_7f2r5y6=Press_Release_Template_fry_2023_alt.docx In this Guidance for Industry, the FDA outlines important considerations for vaccines that use novel methods of delivery regarding DNA integration, specifically: • DNA integration could theoretically impact a human’s oncogenes • DNA integration may result in chromosomal instability. • The Guidance for Industry discusses biodistribution of DNA vaccines and how such integration could affect unintended parts of the body including blood, heart, brain, liver, kidney, bone marrow, ovaries/testes, lung, draining lymph nodes, spleen, the site of administration at injection site. it is essential to human health to assess the risks of contaminant DNA integration into human DNA. The FDA has provided no evidence that these risks have been assessed to ensure safety. As such, Florida State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo has released the following statement: “The FDA’s response does not provide data or evidence that the DNA integration assessments they recommended themselves have been performed. DNA integration poses a unique and elevated risk to human health and to the integrity of the human genome, including the risk that DNA integrated into sperm or egg gametes could be passed onto offspring of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine recipients. If the risks of DNA integration have not been assessed for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, these vaccines are not appropriate for use in human beings. It is my hope that, in regard to COVID-19, the FDA will one day seriously consider its regulatory responsibility to protect human health, including the integrity of the human genome.” DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events. https://osf.io/preprints/osf/mjc97?utm_source=floridahealth.gov&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=PressRelease&utm_content=Florida%27s_Future_Budget&url_trace_7f2r5y6=Press_Release_Template_fry_2023_alt.docx These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold. In an exploratory analysis, we found preliminary evidence of a dose response relationship of the amount of DNA per dose and the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs). Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs. World Council for Health https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/world-council-health-expert-panel-finds-cancer-dna-chandrasekaran/ https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1711972307151868015?s=20 Bacterial DNA has been found in mRNA vaccine vials. A cancer-promoting genetic sequence—SV40—has been found in the Covid-19 vaccines. This was not present in the vials used for the approval studies but has been found in all vials of the BioNTech vials disseminated for public use. https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/exclusive-health-canada-confirms-undisclosed-presence-of-dna-seque Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Showing 1–20 of 808 episodes