Skip to content
Artwork for Year One
BusinessEntrepreneurship

Year One

Year One

Every billion-dollar YC company survived a brutal first year after Demo Day. Year One captures those twelve months as they happen, tracking one founder's make-or-break decision per episode: the pivot that saved the company, the co-founder fight that almost killed it, the fundraising round that closed at 2am on a Thursday. Two hosts (one former YC founder, one startup reporter) sit down with recent batch founders while the wounds are still fresh, then bring in YC partners to dissect what went right, what went wrong, and what the founder couldn't see from inside the fog. If you're an aspiring founder, an early startup employee, or an investor trying to understand why 90% of startups stall while a handful become Stripe or Airbnb, this is the show that replaces hindsight polish with the version founders tell each other at 1am on Bookface.

Play
  • 22 episodes
  • weekly
  • Avg 15 min
  • English
Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.
  • S1 · E25
    Wednesday · 16 min

    9 Mothers: The $200M That Warped the Batch

    Days before Demo Day, a $200 million valuation for an unnamed S26 startup lands in a YC founder group chat and won't stop spreading. On this episode of Year One, Miles and Grant trace how that single number rewrites every other founder's negotiation in the batch, then reveal the company behind it: 9 Mothers, a counter-drone defense startup out of Austin, and the Palmer Luckey and Garry Tan context (via TBPN) that fueled the hype. They dig into Rebel Fund's data showing over a third of the W26 batch scored in YC's top tier, then pressure-test what that grade actually predicts. Michael Seibel's own 2007 Justin.tv numbers get pulled in as a reality check against today's inflated benchmarks. This one's especially useful for founders mid-fundraise who keep comparing their term sheet to someone else's headline, and for anyone trying to separate real signal from Demo Day noise.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E24
    September 1 · 17 min

    Demo Day+72: How S26 Term Sheets Get Priced

    The applause hasn't even faded and the phones are already lighting up. This episode of Year One picks up in the 72 hours after S26's Demo Day, when term sheets start arriving with clocks attached and top companies field hundreds of offers before the weekend is over. The stakes are immediate: sign fast on incomplete information, or risk losing a hot deal while trying to compare offers against a market that suddenly looks like 2021 again. We break down why default SAFE caps have jumped from $2M-on-$20M to $4M-on-$40M in three years, what YC's own reasoning for same-day asks actually is, and how a generous-looking cap can quietly cost a founder more equity down the road. We also walk through a simple test for telling real investor conviction from manufactured urgency before the inbox even fills up. Essential listening for founders staring down their own term sheet clock, or anyone trying to understand how Demo Day money actually moves.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E23
    August 25 · 15 min

    Nadia: The Verdict Arrives

    Nadia has just opened the YC decision email she has been waiting on for weeks, and in this episode you hear the exact moment she finds out if her company’s next year is completely rewritten. The stakes are simple and huge: either she’s in and locked into a YC batch, or she has to rebuild the plan she’s been working toward all summer. You have to hear this one because Nadia reads the verdict out loud, processes it in real time, and immediately loops in her cofounder before she even lets herself react. From there, Miles and Grant bring the YC partner back on mic to break down what this outcome structurally changes for her next 90 days, and what the alternate path would have looked like if the answer had been no. Together they unpack what “useful feedback” really means, what founders who don’t get in actually do next, and how persistence shows up beyond the polished success stories, all through the lens of Year One decisions that compound. Published August 25, 2026, this episode is especially relevant if you’re anywhere near hitting submit on your own YC application.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E22
    August 18 · 10 min

    Nadia: The Ten Days Before August 28

    Ten days before Y Combinator's August 28 decision date, founder Nadia is stuck in the kind of limbo that quietly reshapes how she runs her company. Her Fall 2026 seed round may hinge on a single letter, and on this episode of Year One, hosts Grant and Miles push past the surface to find out if that wait is a real bet or a story she's telling herself. Nadia walks through exactly what she built and cut in her last four weeks, and Grant catches her rounding up a revenue number in a moment that says more than the numbers themselves — raising the question of whether her roadmap was built for customers or for three YC partners in a room. The conversation doesn't stop at acceptance odds; Grant runs the real math on rejection, the investor process she hasn't started, and what a YC partner says separates founders who use uncertainty well from those who freeze in it. Essential listening for any founder currently staring down their own countdown.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E21
    August 11 · 12 min

    Nadia: What the Yes or No Actually Bought Her

    Nadia read the email four times and still couldn't parse it. An ambiguous status update from Y Combinator landed Tuesday night, and what followed was ninety seconds of dead air before she said a word. On this episode of Year One, hosts Miles and Grant trace the exact month leading up to her August 28th decision date: the pilot customer she chased, the six-week feature she killed after it went unused, the ops hire she postponed to protect runway, and the parallel fundraise she quietly shut down without telling half her team. Grant presses on what Nadia won't say directly, including a co-founder question she deflects twice, while Miles brings in YC's own guidance on how partners read the waiting period as evidence, not dead time. They also break down what actually changes operationally the morning a founder gets a yes versus a no. This one's especially relevant if you're mid-application, mid-wait, or making decisions right now that assume an outcome you don't actually control yet.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E20
    August 4 · 11 min

    Nadia: The Verdict Lands August 28

    Founder Nadia submitted her YC Fall 2026 application just before the July 27 deadline, and now she's twenty-four days into total silence, waiting for an interview invite she can't control. In this Year One episode, she reveals the real bets she made during the wait: an engineering hire she paused and can't fully explain, a vague team update that skirted the numbers YC applicants are told to include, and a fundraise she's put on hold, telling investors to wait until after the decision date. When pressed, she goes quiet on whether she was straight with them about her timeline. The hosts bring in reported YC data on acceptance rates and the shift to four annual batches, reframing a possible rejection as a costly quarter rather than a company-ending verdict, then test whether Nadia's rehearsed 'no' plan actually holds up. This one's especially relevant for founders sitting in their own YC silence right now, wondering what their inbox is actually costing them.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E19
    July 28 · 11 min

    Nadia: Betting the Raise on August 28

    Eight minutes before the YC Fall 2026 application deadline closed on July 27, Nadia deleted a paragraph about her co-founder — and on this episode of Year One, Miles and Grant press her on whether that was real editing or something else entirely. The stakes are immediate: her one-line pitch went through four rewrites, she bet on a smaller retention number over a bigger one, and two critical figures — her runway and her co-founder's actual equity split — never made it into the application at all. Nadia reveals she has no written plan B, unlike her co-founder, while Grant and Miles walk through YC's real $500K deal terms and what the shift to four batches a year means for her odds. As of Tuesday, July 28, she's still waiting on an interview invite, with a decision due August 28. This one's essential listening for any founder staring down their own YC deadline, wondering what they left out of the document.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E18
    July 27 · 17 min

    Mato: Turning Personalized Demos Into Onboarding

    Alexander Benz had a new product category, a cold lead pipeline, and only two minutes to convince confused prospects to try something they had never seen before. The stakes were simple and brutal: fix onboarding or watch high-intent YC-style leads quietly disappear. In this episode of Year One, he walks through how he turned the demo itself into the onboarding experience, from the first over-explained flows that flopped to the personalized, AI-built demo shows that now warm people up before a second call. You have to hear this one because he details the exact sequence: generating a custom podcast based on a prospect’s site, leading with listening before UI, automating a full demo page in minutes, and then using that to shift the second call into implementation instead of persuasion. Along the way, the hosts connect his UX and sales background to classic YC lessons on trust, urgency, and tailoring onboarding for complex products. Published July 27, 2026, this episode is especially relevant if you are a founder designing first-touch onboarding for a product your users have no mental model for yet.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E17
    July 21 · 12 min

    F26: The Application Nobody Finished Yet

    Three weeks before her YC application deadline, a founder sat in her kitchen and stopped mid-sentence, realizing her polished traction slide left out the real reason she started the company. With July 27 at 8pm PT closing in fast, this episode of Year One follows her scramble to rewrite the story she almost submitted. Miles and Grant trace what her draft got wrong: an emotional origin story cut for a single data point, a co-founder dynamic buried in vague language, and a $500k SAFE quietly shaping every sentence she writes. Grant breaks down how YC partners actually read applications like hers, why an unshot one-minute video is now a countdown risk, and why an honest, rougher app often beats an over-polished one. They also unpack the real math behind acceptance odds and what happens if she misses the deadline entirely. This one's especially relevant if you're staring down your own YC deadline and wondering what to cut, what to keep, and what your application is quietly hiding.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E13
    July 7 · 12 min

    Corgi: The Cease-and-Desist Heard on X

    When Papermark founder Marc Seitz accused insurance startup Corgi of copying his open-source dataroom software word for word, the stakes escalated fast: Corgi's own CEO admitted their AI 'vibe-coding' had produced near-identical pages, then responded with cease-and-desist letters, including one over an unrelated joke tweet. On this episode of Year One, Miles and Grant break down what actually happened, why identical wording (not identical code) is the real legal vulnerability, and how this compares to the 2024 PearAI cloning scandal. They dig into Corgi's rapid climb to a $2.6 billion valuation, the seven-day-workweek culture stories swirling around it, and whether repeat litigation spooks enterprise buyers doing due diligence. With Papermark still holding off on a lawsuit, the hosts pose an open question for the AI-native era: does aggressive legal posturing protect founders, or does it eventually cost them. Essential listening for YC founders navigating fast growth, AI tooling, and the fine line between speed and recklessness.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E12
    June 30 · 17 min

    Corgi: The IP Scandal Every S26 Founder Is Ignoring

    A YC-backed insurtech called Corgi shipped its Dataroom product on June 24th and was facing a public plagiarism accusation within twenty-four hours. The stakes were immediate: an AGPL-licensed open-source competitor posted side-by-side screenshots, Corgi blamed vibe coding, then sent cease-and-desist letters to the accuser and a founder who tweeted a joke about it. In this episode of Year One, Miles and Grant talk to an S26 founder who admits they can only explain sixty to seventy percent of their AI-generated codebase and never ran a license audit before shipping — which turns out to be Corgi's exact problem at a smaller scale. They break down the four-layer IP exposure every vibe-coded startup carries: AGPL strict liability, the Copyright Office's January 2025 ruling on AI-generated output, and the invention assignment gap that quietly kills YC Series A deals before founders know what hit them. If you're shipping with AI-assisted tools and haven't thought seriously about license scanning or invention assignment agreements, this one is required listening.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E11
    June 23 · 15 min

    S26 Day One: What the First Week Actually Decides

    A founder inside YC's Summer 2026 batch describes day one of S26 — not the pitch, not the Demo Day narrative, the unedited version. The room was quieter than expected, and before office hours existed, real decisions were already being made: who to trust, which signals to act on, and whether to build the chip or the scheduler. In this episode of Year One, Miles and Grant pull apart the first uninvited choices S26 founders made, break down the structural information asymmetry between founders and YC partners in week one, and analyze the Summer 2026 Request for Startups as a conviction map — not a checklist. Eight of fifteen RFS categories require hardware or capital, and one partner's name appears on three of them. That's not an accident. Grant frames what partners are actually tracking earliest, Miles connects a live Inference Chips founder decision to the utilization gap hiding in the RFS, and neither of them knows how it ends — because the batch just started. If you're a founder inside YC right now, or trying to read where it's placing its bets, this one is built for you.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E9
    June 16 · 17 min

    Jorge: Turning BrainHi’s GTM Into an Engineered Machine

    Jorge B. Macías had to figure out how to sell an AI product to medical offices from Puerto Rico, scale it to millions in ARR, and do it as the first founder from the island to take a company through YC—without a traditional sales background. The stakes were high: represent a whole ecosystem on the YC stage while carrying the pressure of proving a repeatable way to win B2B deals far from Silicon Valley. You have to hear this one because Jorge breaks down how he turned industrial engineering tools into a “GTM engineering” system that took BrainHi from messy first calls to a structured sales engine. He talks about growing up trying to escape his family’s sales legacy, then realizing that process thinking—not charisma—is what closes and scales deals. Along the way, he unpacks the emotional hit of constant rejection, the mindset shift from fighting gatekeepers to winning them over, and the hidden differences between B2B and consumer selling that trip most founders up. This Year One episode also touches on YC expectations, Demo Day hindsight, and why his real career turned out to be building systems, not carrying a quota. Published June 11, 2026, it is especially relevant for early-stage B2B founders who know they need sales but do not yet have a sales engine.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E10
    June 16 · 15 min

    S26: The $2M Token Trap

    Sam Altman walked into a YC event and offered every startup in the current batch $2 million in API tokens for an uncapped equity stake — and founders had to decide on the spot whether that was a gift or a trap. In this Year One episode, we get inside the deal mechanics behind OpenAI's tokenmaxxing offer: what an uncapped SAFE actually does to your cap table, and why the real cost stays invisible until you're in the Series A room. Two founders from the same YC batch made opposite calls — one signed for the signal value, one walked over vendor lock-in — and their reasoning cuts straight to the fault lines of the deal. A YC partner then runs the numbers on stacked unconverted SAFEs, which can consume 35 to 45 percent of a cap table before a Series A dollar comes in, and flags why most founders won't feel the consequences for years. This one is essential listening for any early-stage founder weighing infrastructure partnerships that also hand your investor a permanent seat at the table. If you know a Year One founder with a story worth telling, reach out at yearone@heymato.com.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E8
    June 9 · 15 min

    The S26 Email: What Getting In (and Not) Actually Means

    Two founders applied to YC S26. One got in. One didn't. In this episode of Year One, Miles and Grant sit with both of them inside the moment the decision email arrived — and what happened next reveals more about each founder than the application itself did. The accepted founder had reverse-engineered proof-of-velocity signals specifically for YC's evaluation criteria. The rejected founder had spent her final six weeks rewriting her bio. A YC partner breaks down the two signals that move an application from interesting to interview — traction curve shape and founder-problem fit — and both founders' stories map almost exactly onto what the partner describes. Grant pushes hard on the rejected founder's traction number, pointing out she had evidence she simply didn't lean into. With Demo Day on September 10th, one founder has $500k and 14 weeks; the other has roughly 90 days before the next deadline and, when the hosts last spoke to her, still no plan. If you're preparing a YC application or trying to understand why a strong company didn't get in, this one is worth your full attention.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E3
    June 5 · 9 min

    Mato: Betting YC Will Turbocharge AI Podcasting

    Alex Benz is applying to YC Summer 2026 while already sitting on $10k MRR, four enterprise customers, and a live AI podcast platform that actually works in production—and he has to decide whether to double down now or wait for more signal. The stakes are real: timing this YC application could determine whether Mato becomes infrastructure for big podcast networks or stalls as a niche tool. You have to hear this one because Alex breaks down how Mato’s AI hosts run live interviews with real humans, auto-generate full episodes from RSS feeds and custom topics, and ship edited audio, transcripts, show notes, cover art, and ads with almost no human lift. He walks through landing early deals with networks like iHeart and Blaze, the scrappy channel partner who unlocked his first customers, and how his 14 years in UX shaped a product non-technical producers actually adopt. A YC partner weighs in on what “enough traction” means at $10k MRR two months in and how YC thinks about AI infrastructure versus point solutions. Published May 6, 2026, this Year One episode is especially relevant if you’re on the fence about YC timing or building anything in the podcast or media automation space.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E1
    June 5 · 16 min

    Hex Security: $1M ARR in 8 Weeks

    Fourteen companies in the YC W26 batch hit a million in ARR before Demo Day ended — three times more than the previous winter batch and the highest count in YC history. The question Miles and Grant press on in this episode of Year One isn't whether that number is impressive; it's what it actually costs to get there in ninety days, and whether the valuation it commands is earned or a cap table trap. They pull apart Hex Security, which reached $1M ARR in eight weeks by deploying AI agents for continuous penetration testing, and examine why their batch-as-first-customer strategy worked — and where it gets harder. They also surface a counter-intuitive finding across the full W26 batch: the fastest-growing companies didn't pivot, they held course. With the default round now sitting at $4M on a $40M post-money — double what W23 commanded — the Series A math deserves a hard look. This episode is especially relevant for early-stage founders deciding when to price their first round. Know a YC founder in their first year who'd tell their story? Reach out at yearone@heymato.com.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E7
    June 2 · 16 min

    The S26 Call: Two Founders, One Decision Window

    Two founders applied to YC S26 in the same window. One got the interview invite. One hit June 2 in silence. This Year One episode follows both through the moment the decision became real — and what each story reveals about how YC partners actually filter thousands of applications down to a batch. The accepted founder walks through the traction question that nearly ended her interview, the four seconds of silence that felt terminal, and the evening phone call that changed everything. The rejected founder already had a rehearsed answer about what went wrong — twelve users, no paid revenue — and Miles and Grant examine whether that diagnosis is honest or just the version that's easier to say out loud. Grant breaks down why the written application is the real filter, not the interview, and what separates founders who can defend a number under pressure from those who can't. If you're rebuilding for W27 or trying to understand what YC partners are actually watching, this one is worth your full attention.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E6
    May 26 · 17 min

    The Quiet Breakdown: What Year One Actually Costs

    A founder walks into an all-hands meeting running the best quarter of her company's life, and realizes mid-sentence she has nothing left. Not tired. Empty. In this episode of Year One, Miles and Grant trace her burnout from month four to month nine, anchored in CEREVITY's shadow burnout research showing 73% of founders experience persistent exhaustion while still hitting their targets, and Sifted's 2025 survey finding only 6% of founders reported zero mental health issues. A therapist who works exclusively with founders breaks down the three clinical markers that separate burnout from high-functioning stress, including the identity fusion trap that makes asking for help feel like admitting the company itself is failing. The episode also examines what YC partners actually observe when a founder starts deteriorating, and whether investors are structurally positioned to intervene, with early efforts like Felicis Ventures' 1% Founder Development Pledge and the foundermental.health clinical survey offering a partial answer. There is no clean resolution here. If you are a first-year founder who has been performing fine while feeling nothing, this one is for you.

    • Transcript
  • S1 · E5
    May 19 · 16 min

    Jon: The Co-Founder Split Nobody Saw Coming

    Jon Yoo closed a seed round for Suger, his YC Winter 2023 marketplace startup, and then his co-founder walked out. What followed was five weeks with zero customers, a solo rebuild, and a run from $500K to $2M ARR in six months with a team of five. In this episode of Year One, Miles and Grant go deep on the moment Jon knew the split was coming and why neither side said it out loud sooner, the deliberate customer-sequencing strategy he used to climb from early logos like Fivetran toward Snowflake, and what YC partner data actually says about co-founder breakups as a leading killer of otherwise fundable startups. They also surface a complicating detail: Suger's Series A press materials still list two co-founders, leaving the solo-founder narrative murkier than the headline suggests. The episode closes on the structural question that outlasts the people drama: can a company scale past Series A when one person is still the single point of failure? Essential listening for any founder navigating a co-founder split or building toward their first institutional round.

    • Transcript
Showing 1–20 of 22 episodes