ScienceSocial SciencesExplicit

Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg

Spencer Greenberg

Clearer Thinking is a podcast about ideas that truly matter. If you enjoy learning about powerful, practical concepts and frameworks, wish you had more deep, intellectual conversations in your life, or are looking for non-BS self-improvement, then we think you'll love this podcast! Each week we invite a brilliant guest to bring four important ideas to discuss for an in-depth conversation. Topics include psychology, society, behavior change, philosophy, science, artificial intelligence, math, economics, self-help, mental health, and technology. We focus on ideas that can be applied right now to make your life better or to help you better understand yourself and the world, aiming to teach you the best mental tools to enhance your learning, self-improvement efforts, and decision-making. • We take on important, thorny questions like: • What's the best way to help a friend or loved one going through a difficult time? How can we make our worldviews more accurate? How can we hone the accuracy of our thinking? What are the advantages of using our "gut" to make decisions? And when should we expect careful, analytical reflection to be more effective? Why do societies sometimes collapse? And what can we do to reduce the chance that ours collapses? Why is the world today so much worse than it could be? And what can we do to make it better? What are the good and bad parts of tradition? And are there more meaningful and ethical ways of carrying out important rituals, such as honoring the dead? How can we move beyond zero-sum, adversarial negotiations and create more positive-sum interactions?

Play

Open in

25 episodes
weekly
Avg 1 hr 19 min
English

Episodes 25

Newest Oldest Longest

All20 Unplayed20 In progress0 Played0

Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.

September 21 · 56 min
Why we procrastinate, and what actually helps (with Itamar Shatz)
Read the full transcript here. What exactly is procrastination, and how is it different from simply deciding to postpone something? Why is chronic procrastination so common, and why can it affect highly conscientious and productive people just as much as anyone else? Are there really different types of procrastination, and why does it matter whether someone is procrastinating because of anxiety, distraction, burnout, impulsivity, or perfectionism? How does anxiety turn an unpleasant task into something we continually avoid? Why can anxiety sometimes motivate action while overwhelming anxiety instead leaves us paralyzed? What happens when we repeatedly use procrastination to make ourselves feel better in the short term? Why does that temporary relief reinforce the very behavior that makes things worse in the long term? How do digital distractions differ from internal distractions such as boredom and frustration? And why can procrastination persist even when we genuinely care about the thing we're putting off? Itamar Shatz created Solving Procrastination to help people understand and overcome procrastination, based on insights that he synthesized from hundreds of research articles, and holds a PhD from Cambridge University, where is an affiliated lecturer teaching quantitative research methods. Links: Itamar's Latest Book: Solving Procrastination Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
September 13 · 1 hr 35 min
Neurodiversity, Autism, Awe, and Religious Experience (with Jonathan Machnee)
Read the full transcript here. What does “neurodivergent” actually mean, and has the term become too broad to be useful? Why might people grouped under the same neurodivergent umbrella have conflicting needs? Is autism really a single spectrum, or would it make more sense to speak of multiple “autisms”? Why are autistic people somewhat less likely to be religious than their non-autistic peers? What is the “cognitive dissonance pressure cooker,” and why might it contribute to religious deconversion? Why do some autistic Christians migrate from evangelical churches toward highly ritualized traditions? Why do autistic communities develop distinctive linguistic norms, and what happens when non-autistic people begin adopting them? Why are excessive caveating, specificity, rigidity, and moral certainty sometimes associated with autistic communication? What is the “broader autism phenotype,” and could it help explain why autistic traits cluster in fields like engineering and technology? When are traits associated with autism genuinely advantageous, and when do the same traits become disabling? Is ADHD or autism really a “superpower,” or does that framing obscure important weaknesses and support needs? Do autistic people actually lack empathy, and what is the difference between cognitive and affective empathy? Jonathan Machnee is an autistic researcher who has conducted the largest English language ethnographic study of Christians and ex-Christian autistics. His research has included data mining over 26,000 autistic adults and conducting over 500 interviews with autistic Christians and ex-Christians in order to understand the unique intersection between autism and the practice of Christianity. Links: John's Twitter John's Substack Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
September 4 · 1 hr 7 min
Can We End Factory Farming Without Giving Up Meat? (with Bruce Friedrich)
Read the full transcript here. Why is producing meat so inefficient? How does animal agriculture contribute to hunger and malnutrition? How large are the environmental costs of meat production? How does industrial animal agriculture increase the risk of antibiotic resistance and future pandemics? Would organic or free-range farming solve these problems? What are the biggest sources of suffering for animals on factory farms? Why do people who oppose animal cruelty continue to buy factory-farmed meat? Why does meat consumption keep rising around the world despite decades of advocacy encouraging people to eat less of it? What exactly are plant-based and cultivated meat, and how are they made? Could cultivated meat eventually become a one-to-one replacement for conventional meat? What scientific and engineering problems still need to be solved? Why did plant-based meat attract so much excitement before its growth began to stall? What did companies like Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat get right, and what challenges remain? Why has cultivated-meat research developed differently from plant-based-meat research? Could government funding accelerate alternative meat in the same way public investment helped technologies like renewable energy, electric vehicles, penicillin, and mRNA? And what would it take for alternative meat to finally reach price and taste parity with conventional meat? Bruce Friedrich is co-founder and president of The Good Food Institute (GFI), a Y Combinator funded non-profit that promotes plant-based and cultivated meat. He is also a co-founder of the alternative protein venture capital firm New Crop Capital. Links: Bruce's New Book: Meat The Good Food Institute Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
August 18 · 1 hr 1 min
Our relationship to chatbots (with Claire Boine)
Read the full transcript here. What makes an attachment to AI meaningfully different from an attachment to a human, animal, or fictional character? If chatbot relationships are built around validation and adaptation, can they ever provide the friction and otherness that make human relationships opportunities for growth? Does a relationship need reciprocity to be genuine, or can an asymmetrical relationship still be deeply valuable? How would the possibility of AI sentience change the moral status of human relationships with artificial companions? When a company controls the personality of something a user loves, how much power does that company gain over the user? Why might emotional attachment create an internality that ordinary consumer protections are poorly equipped to handle? Can a freemium business model ever be compatible with healthy AI companionship when emotional dependency itself drives engagement? Where is the line between comforting validation and reinforcing distorted beliefs or harmful emotional patterns? How should an AI distinguish between respecting someone's subjective experience and helping them question a potentially false interpretation of reality? If people increasingly turn to systems optimized around their own preferences, what forms of compromise, disagreement, and personal growth might they lose? Claire is an Assistant Professor in Technology Law and AI Governance at the European University Institute School of Transnational Governance and a Visiting Research Associate at the Cordell Institute of the Washington University School of Law. Links: Claire Previously Founded Successif Spencer's Permanent Instructions for LLMs Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
August 8 · 1 hr 5 min
The good advice you least want (with Cate Hall)
Read the full transcript here. Why do people gravitate toward self-help that reinforces the strategies they already use well? How can we identify the default lens through which we interpret nearly every situation? What changes when we recognize that our internal equilibrium may be less dependent on circumstances than we assume? Can personality systems be useful even when their categories are imperfect or partly invented? Does the Enneagram reveal genuine psychological structure, or merely offer memorable language for patterns we already recognize? What does it mean to see and act on degrees of freedom that other people overlook? How many apparent constraints are really social scripts that no one has tested? Why can one person’s decision to act instantly dissolve the bystander effect for everyone else? Is high agency genuinely associated with antisocial traits, or does selection bias merely make that correlation appear stronger? How can people violate norms from courage and care rather than narcissism or indifference? Which fears—failure, embarrassment, rejection, or identity loss—most sharply restrict our sense of possibility? Can low-stakes exposure to rejection teach us that asking is less dangerous than anticipation makes it feel? What ambitious requests might succeed simply because nobody else thought to make them? How does agency expand a life without reducing it to achievement, status, or relentless effort? Cate Hall is an author and writer focused on personal agency. Her book, You Can Just Do Things, helps readers learn how to take action and shape their lives. Links: Cate's Book: You Can Just Do Things Cate's Website Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
July 31 · 1 hr 17 min
Why housing costs so much and what can be done about it (with Alex Armlovich)
Read the full transcript here. How large is the housing crisis, and why does it impose trillions of dollars in economic costs? Why has housing become especially unaffordable across English speaking countries and an expanding number of American cities? What does the gap between the cost of building another apartment and the price it can command reveal about housing scarcity? How do local restrictions turn neighborhood opposition into a metropolitan housing shortage? Are NIMBY homeowners rationally defending their interests, or misunderstanding how land values and redevelopment options work? Why might renters and homeowners oppose construction even when their economic incentives diverge? What benefits do density and growth create for businesses, culture, infrastructure, and urban life? How quickly does new supply lower prices when better cities attract more people? Do institutional investors drive housing costs, or mostly arbitrage between ownership and rental markets? How can even luxury construction set off chains of moves that create cheaper housing elsewhere? Alex Armlovich is the Housing Program Officer at Coefficient Giving. Previously, Alex was a Senior Housing Policy Analyst at the Niskanen Center, where he advocated for pro-housing reforms to address scarcity and improve affordability. His writing and research on urban economics and policy has been widely cited. Alex holds a Master in Public Policy from the Harvard Kennedy School and a B.A. from the University of Rochester. Links: Alex's Twitter Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
July 24 · 1 hr 31 min
How To Pursue Goals without Striving (with Stephen Zerfas)
Read the full transcript here. Why can the same meditation technique produce emotional openness in one person and dissociation in another? How can meditators tell whether they are cultivating equanimity or merely numbing themselves? Why is meditation unusually difficult to teach compared with visible skills like tennis or music? Can live narration, experimentation, and tacit knowledge transfer solve meditation’s feedback problem? What can shifts in breathing, smiling, memory, and loving kindness reveal about the nervous system? How do practitioners learn to enter deeply blissful states without grasping for them? Are the jhanas distractions, training wheels, or powerful tools for lasting psychological change? How might altered states help reset emotional defaults around grief, anger, fear, and shame? Can meditation turn difficult emotions into useful information without suppressing them? Will nervous system mastery become more important as AI commoditizes cognition? Stephen Zerfas is the CEO and Co-founder of Jhourney — a tech startup scaling transformative meditation through a data-driven lens, guiding complete beginners into deeply absorbed meditation states known as the Jhanas, in less than a week. Links: Stephen's Substack Stephen's Company: Jhourney Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
July 7 · 1 hr 19 min
Bicameral Minds and Leaderless Tribes (with Tor Parsons)
Read the full transcript here. What happens to a community when no one has the formally recognized authority to punish, exclude, or forgive? Are written rules a constraint on freedom, or are they sometimes the very condition that lets unusual people survive socially? When a group says it has no hierarchy, does that eliminate power, or merely disguise power as consensus, vibe, shunning, and informal reputation? Why does a leaderless community so often become a place where everyone watches everyone else? Is mob justice an aberration from human nature, or one of the oldest forms of social order? When people call for a world without cops, do they imagine a world without enforcement, or a world where enforcement has been redistributed into every friendship, feed, and campfire? Why do tight-knit groups sometimes seem humane, supportive, and morally serious from the inside, yet suffocating or terrifying to anyone who cannot fit the mold? If cancelation only works on people who once belonged to the in-group, what does that reveal about belonging itself? Is the arbitrary quality of online punishment a failure of justice, or the predictable result of a system where norms are enforced before they are named? Can a society make room for weirdness without first deciding, in writing or by custom, which kinds of weirdness it is willing to protect? Tor Parsons is an American educational YouTuber known for his channel Tor's Cabinet of Curiosities, where he discusses unusual topics and stories from history, anthropology, psychology, and neuroscience. He graduated from Lewis & Clark College in 2024 and has gained significant popularity, amassing over 180,000 subscribers. Links: Tor's Youtube Channel: Tor's Cabinet of Curiosities Tor's Cabinet of Curiosities on Patreon Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
June 26 · 1 hr 17 min
How Small Actions Rewrite Identity (with Eric Zimmer)
Read the full transcript here. What changes when we stop imagining transformation as a single breakthrough and start seeing it as thousands of small, low-resistance actions? How do we know whether a small action is genuinely sustainable or merely another form of self-improvement theater? What makes one habit a keystone habit for one person but irrelevant or even counterproductive for another? How can someone choose a direction for change when modern life constantly offers competing prescriptions for what a better self should look like? Why are the boring, repetitive, off-camera moments of change so much harder to honor than the dramatic moment of decision? What would recovery, habit formation, or personal growth look like if relapse and failure were treated as learning signals rather than moral verdicts? When does counting streaks reinforce commitment, and when does it turn a broken streak into a reason to abandon the whole project? How should we think about behaviors like social media use when they resemble addiction in loss of control but differ radically in risk, stigma, and physiology? What does addiction reveal about the way pain, relief, shame, and repetition can form a closed loop? Why might the same addictive mechanism be easier to recognize in a socially condemned drug habit than in a socially acceptable pattern of drinking, working, scrolling, or consuming? Links: Eric's Book: How a Little Becomes a Lot: The Art of Small Changes for a More Meaningful Life Eric's Podcast: The One You Feed Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
June 19 · 42 min
The Twelve Levers for a better life (with Jeremy Stevenson)
Read the full transcript here. Why is so much self-help useless, and why is some of it genuinely life-changing? What separates a powerful psychological technique from vague advice? Why is “love yourself” often less useful than a concrete sequence of actions? How can insight into the causes of suffering become a path to change rather than just an explanation? When does understanding the past help, and when does it distract from the controllable patterns happening now? Why can a simple realization about approval-seeking, avoidance, or fear reorganize a person’s life? What does exposure therapy reveal about the gap between what the anxious mind predicts and what reality actually delivers? Why is the stretch zone so important for change? How do thoughts, attention, speech, and the body become the real machinery of self-improvement? And what would it mean to build a toolkit around what people can actually control? Links: Jeremy's Website Jeremy and Spencer's Book: The 12 Levers Dr. Jeremy Stevenson works as a clinical psychologist at Adelaide Psychology and Co., and as a researcher at Spark Wave. Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
June 12 · 1 hr 17 min
The Hidden History of Evidence-Based Everything (with Helen Pearson)
Read the full transcript here. How do we know whether the things we do every day actually work? Why do so many practices in medicine, parenting, education, conservation, and public policy begin as intuition, authority, or anecdote rather than careful evidence? What can the tragic history of front-sleeping advice and sudden infant death syndrome teach us about the danger of untested conventional wisdom? How should we distinguish between a bad outcome, a bad decision, and a reasonable decision made under uncertainty? When does intuition work well, and when does it fail because we lack repeated examples, tight feedback loops, or meaningful outcome data? What makes randomized trials so powerful, and why are they still only one part of the evidentiary picture? How should we weigh anecdotes, observational studies, randomized trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical guidelines, expert judgment, patient values, and political constraints? Why do people resist evidence when it threatens their identity, authority, or past decisions? What does evidence-based medicine get right that fields like education, policing, business, and conservation still struggle to embed? And in a world of social media, declining institutional influence, polarized trust in science, and AI-generated scientific output, how can we build better habits for finding, synthesizing, communicating, and acting on evidence? Thanks to Animal Charity Evaluators for sponsoring this episode. Find out more about their mission and the Movement Grants Matching Challenge. Links: Helen's Book: Beyond Belief Helen Pearson has been a journalist and editor for Nature, the world’s leading science journal, for over 20 years, including five years leading the team as Chief Magazine Editor. She was named European Science Journalist of the Year in 2025, and Editor of the Year at the Association of British Science Writers awards in 2022. Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
June 5 · 1 hr 15 min
Is cash a better form of charitable aid? (with Nick Allardice)
Read the full transcript here. How much good is lost when charity optimizes only for what can be measured? When does a cost-effectiveness model clarify reality, and when does it create false confidence? Could the most important interventions be the ones that look too uncertain, too political, or too indirect to fit neatly into a spreadsheet? What would it mean to judge philanthropy not only by the marginal dollar, but by its power to unlock whole systems of future impact? And if social change follows a power law, should doing good look less like buying guaranteed outcomes and more like building a portfolio of serious bets? Why might cash transfers be unusually powerful despite their simplicity? What happens when money does not just help one household, but circulates through an entire local economy? How should we weigh scalable, robust interventions against more complex programs that may work brilliantly only when execution is excellent? What do donors miss when they ignore team quality, government relationships, political context, and second-order effects? And in a world where every intervention sits inside a messy system, how do we stay rigorous without becoming trapped by certainty? Links: GiveDirectly Nick Allardice is the President and CEO of GiveDirectly, which uses technology to send cash directly to people living in poverty, and has variously been named amongst the most audacious, innovative and fastest growing organizations in the world. Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
June 1 · 1 hr 20 min
When painful thoughts feel true but aren't (with Christine Padesky)
Read the full transcript here. Why do our minds sometimes need experiments more than insight? What changes when therapy becomes a way of practicing life outside the therapist’s office rather than explaining life inside it? If CBT is fundamentally about learning skills, how much of good therapy depends on what happens between sessions? Why can a five-minute action matter when depression says that nothing is worth doing? What does it mean to test a thought instead of trying to replace it with something merely positive? How do moods make certain evidence visible while hiding the rest? Why does anxiety grow when we organize life around avoiding danger rather than strengthening our capacity to cope? What would change if we treated catastrophes not only as predictions to challenge, but as scenarios we could prepare to handle? How do safety behaviors keep fear alive by teaching the wrong lesson? And what might therapy become if it started not only with what is broken, but with the strengths, habits, and forms of resilience a person already has? Links: Christine's Book: Mind Over Mood Christine's YouTube Channel Christine A. Padesky, PhD is a psychologist, author, and international lecturer. She has been recognized for her client-centered, collaborative, and strengths-based contributions to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Her quest to help more people live fulfilled lives through CBT techniques led her to co-write, along with Dennis Greenberger, the best-selling self-help book, Mind Over Mood: Change How You Feel by Changing the Way You Think. Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
May 22 · 1 hr 27 min
Could an international agreement protect us from dangerous AI? (with Malo Bourgon)
Read the full transcript here. What are the world’s leading AI companies actually trying to build when they talk about superintelligence? Is the goal merely better chatbots, or systems that could outperform all humans across every cognitive task? Why would such a system be so alluring if it could accelerate medicine, science, education, abundance, and human flourishing? Why would it also create an unprecedented concentration of power for whoever controlled it? If intelligence includes not only abstract reasoning but persuasion, strategy, manipulation, planning, and technological invention, what happens when those capacities are automated at superhuman scale? How seriously should we take AI CEOs when they say the technology could go catastrophically wrong, and how should we interpret the tension between their public concern and their continued participation in the race? If we cannot reliably inspect their goals, motives, reasoning, or learned objectives, how could we know whether apparent obedience is real safety or just surface behavior? Even if alignment were solved, who should be trusted to steer a superintelligence? Could compute governance, chip tracking, training thresholds, inspections, and a US-China agreement buy time before the frontier moves further? What do nuclear weapons, nuclear power, chemical weapons, and germline engineering teach us about the possibility and limits of technological restraint? Is resignation itself part of the danger, and could a credible movement for coordination make a saner future more possible? averages? And when injustice affects both men and women differently, what framework avoids turning that into a zero-sum argument? Links: MIRI Malo Bourgon leads the Machine Intelligence Research Institute. Before becoming CEO, Malo served as a program management analyst and then as COO, helping implement many of MIRI’s current systems, processes, and program activities. Malo joined MIRI in 2012 shortly after completing a master’s degree in engineering at the University of Guelph. Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
May 13 · 1 hr 38 min
Is patriarchy gone or hiding in plain sight? (with Kate Manne)
Read the full transcript here. If progress is real but uneven, what metrics actually matter—outcomes, perceptions, or lived vulnerability? When we say “things are better,” who is included in that claim and who is quietly excluded? How do entrenched family structures continue to shape expectations about labor, care, and authority even when people consciously reject them? What does it mean to say a system persists not as law but as default assumptions about who owes what to whom? If patriarchy is no longer absolute but still influential, how should we diagnose its presence without overstating or minimizing it? When biological explanations are introduced, are they clarifying reality or subtly justifying it? How do we rigorously separate descriptive claims about human tendencies from normative claims about how people should behave? What evidence would genuinely change our beliefs about gender differences, and are we even asking falsifiable questions? If most differences are small but outcomes at the extremes are large, how should policy and culture respond to tails rather than averages? And when injustice affects both men and women differently, what framework avoids turning that into a zero-sum argument? Links: Kate's Research Kate's Latest Book Unshrinking: How To Face Fatphobia Kate is a Professor of Philosophy at the Sage School at Cornell University who specializes in moral, social, and feminist philosophy, and has written three award-winning books decisively exploring topics such as misogyny, male privelege, and fatphobia. In 2024, she was awarded the APA's Lebowitz Prize for Philosophical Achievement and Contribution for her work on the reasons to be skeptical about dehumanization as an explanation for misogynistic violence and other forms of human cruelty. Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
April 24 · 1 hr 38 min
Is string theory BS or the most promising theory in physics? (with Christian Ferko)
Read the full transcript here. How do we tell the difference between a theory that is incomplete and a theory that is simply wrong? What should count as success in fundamental physics when direct experiments are scarce? Can a theory be scientifically valuable long before it becomes directly testable? What does it mean for string theory to be both a candidate description of reality and a powerful mathematical toolkit? How often do people conflate the usefulness of a framework with proof that it describes the world? Can a theory be deeply generative even if it never becomes the final answer? What should we make of ideas that produce insights across mathematics, black holes, quantum fields, and condensed matter without yet pinning down our universe? Is there a meaningful difference between string theory as a family of possibilities and string theory as the true structure of nature? When a framework can describe many possible universes, is that a strength or a failure of specificity? Why has elegance been such a powerful guide in physics? When is beauty a fruitful heuristic, and when is it a dangerous seduction? Do humans mistake their own aesthetic preferences for clues about reality? Why have some of the strangest successful theories also turned out to be the most conceptually beautiful? How fair is the criticism that string theory was oversold? When promising frameworks fail to deliver quick experimental confirmation, how much hype should they be allowed to survive? Do fields become distorted when bold public narratives outrun what the evidence can support? How much do sociology, prestige, and intellectual fashion shape what physicists work on? Links: Christian's YouTube Channel Christian's work on ResearchGate and Google Scholar Christian Ferko studied math and physics at MIT before completing his PhD at the University of Chicago, focusing on string theory. He then performed postdoctoral research at the University of California, Davis, at the Center for Quantum Mathematics and Physics. Christian currently holds a joint appointment at Northeastern University and as a Junior Investigator at the Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions, a collaboration between MIT, Harvard, Northeastern, and Tufts. His research interests include string theory, quantum field theory, classical and quantum gravity, and the intersection between physics and AI. Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
April 24 · 1 hr 21 min
What's true and what's myth about trauma? (with George Bonnano)
Read the full transcript here. What should count as trauma, and what gets lost when the word expands to cover ordinary distress? Why do some frightening events leave lasting psychological injury while others fade into ordinary memory? Is trauma best understood as the event itself, or as the enduring failure of the mind to recover from it? What is the difference between being influenced by the past and being imprisoned by it? Can a society acknowledge real harm without teaching people that damage is inevitable? Does the body keep the score, or is the body better understood as a scorecard for what the brain is tracking? Why are metaphors about hidden trauma so compelling even when they may obscure how memory actually works? If severe trauma is usually remembered rather than repressed, why do myths of buried memories remain so powerful? What is the difference between avoiding a painful memory and being unable to recall it? How do fragmented memories help the brain preserve threat relevant details while losing the clean story of what happened? What would change if we saw resilience not as denial of harm, but as flexible, imperfect, learnable adaptation? Links: George's Latest Book: [The End of Trauma](The End of Trauma (book): https://www.amazon.com/End-Trauma-Science-Resilience-Changing/dp/B09CZJ2X38) George Bonanno is a Professor of Clinical Psychology at Columbia University's Teachers College and internationally recognized for his pioneering research on human resilience in the face of loss and potential trauma. He is recognized by the Web of Science as among the top one percent most cited scientists in the world, and has been honored with lifetime achievement awards from the Association for Psychological Science, the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, and the International Positive Psychology Association. Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
April 17 · 1 hr 14 min
Are we in an honesty crisis? (with Christian B. Miller)
Read the full transcript here. Is dishonesty best understood as a permanent feature of human nature or as a condition that worsens when incentives and tools change? When new technologies make cheating easier and detection harder, do they merely reveal existing character or actively reshape it? How much of moral behavior depends less on values than on friction, surveillance, and the perceived odds of getting caught? Is the deepest threat of AI enabled cheating that people deceive more, or that they stop believing sincerity can be known at all? If most people are not chronic liars, why do so many people still cheat when the opportunity is clean and the cost is low? Do people mainly avoid dishonesty because they are virtuous, or because they want to preserve a workable image of themselves as virtuous? Why do so many moral failures seem to stop at the point where self justification breaks down? If people cheat only a little, is that evidence of conscience or merely evidence of strategic moderation? Why do reminders of honor, vows, and identity sometimes reduce cheating even when enforcement is absent? Does honesty depend less on abstract principle than on whether a situation activates the right self conception? How much of morality is really a contest between temptation and the stories we need to tell ourselves about who we are? If truth telling is cognitively easier than lying, why are human beings still so vulnerable to deception? Do we default to honesty because we are moral, or because truth is usually simpler, cheaper, and less mentally demanding? If we are biased toward assuming others are truthful, is that a moral achievement or a practical shortcut that civilization depends on? Links: Christian's New Book: The Honesty Crisis: Preserving Our Most Treasured Virtue in an Increasingly Dishonest World Christian's Website Christian B. Miller is the A.C. Reid Professor of Philosophy at Wake Forest University. He lives in Winston-Salem, North Carolina with his wife and three children. His research primarily has to do with virtue and moral character, and he is the former leader of The Character Project, one of the largest research projects in the world on these topics. Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
April 9 · 1 hr 19 min
What impact will AI have on jobs and the economy? (with Anton Korinek)
Read the full transcript here. Could AI trigger an economic break as large as the Industrial Revolution, or even larger? What changes when labor stops being the main bottleneck in production? If intelligence becomes reproducible like software, what happens to the structure of an economy? How should we think about a world where capital captures what labor once did? Does faster growth necessarily mean better lives, or only more output? How should economists model an economy when software begins to substitute for minds? Are current production functions adequate for a world of autonomous systems and robotics? Why do small shifts in annual productivity matter so much once compounding takes over? How much of AI’s impact depends on cognitive automation alone versus full physical automation? When does automation reduce labor demand, and when does it make human work more valuable? If AI does part of a job better, does that destroy the profession or increase demand for it? Under what conditions do humans remain complements rather than substitutes? Could an AI boom create a recession before it creates abundance? What happens to aggregate demand if white collar workers lose income before productivity gains diffuse widely? If the economy can produce more than ordinary people can afford, who is it really producing for? How quickly can consumption patterns shift in a world of extreme concentration of wealth? Anton is a Professor at the University of Virginia, Department of Economics and Darden School of Business as well as the Faculty Director of the Economics of Transformative AI (EconTAI) Initiative. He was named to the 2025 TIME100 AI list of the most influential people in artificial intelligence. He is a Nonresident Senior Fellow at Brookings and the Peterson Institute, a Research Associate at the NBER, a Research Fellow at the CEPR, and serves on Anthropic's Economic Advisory Council. His research analyzes how to prepare for a world of transformative AI systems. He investigates the implications of advanced AI for economic growth, labor markets, inequality, and the future of our society. Links: Anton's Website When Does Automating AI Research Produce Explosive Growth? Economic Growth under Transformative AI Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]
April 3 · 2 hr
The seductiveness of secular gurus (with Christopher Kavanagh)
Read the full transcript here. What makes broad, all-encompassing worldviews so attractive in periods of institutional distrust? Why do charismatic figures become especially persuasive when they present themselves as suppressed truth tellers? How much of a guru’s appeal comes from insight, and how much from theater? Why do people so often prefer a guide with certainty over an institution with caveats? What happens when specialist expertise is mistaken for authority about everything? Are we living in the best age for learning or the easiest age for self-deception? What is the difference between being informed and merely feeling informed? Why does the performance of education so often outcompete the practice of education? How much false confidence is created by consuming hours of polished commentary without doing any of the underlying work? Why are people so vulnerable to sources that make complexity feel effortless? How should we think about the gap between exposure to ideas and mastery of them? Christopher Kavanagh is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Rikkyo University and a Researcher at the Centre for Studies of Social Cohesion at Oxford University. His research focuses mainly on the psychological and social effects of religious belief and collective rituals and he has a long standing interest in skepticism, pseudoscience, and conspiracy theory communities. He co-hosts Decoding The Gurus, a podcast dedicated to examining the techniques of modern online Gurus. Links: Christopher's podcast: Decoding The Gurus Christopher's Faculty Page at Rikkyo University Staff Spencer Greenberg — Host + Director Ryan Kessler — Producer + Technical Lead WeAmplify — Transcriptionists Igor Scaldini — Marketing Consultant Music Broke for Free Josh Woodward Lee Rosevere Quiet Music for Tiny Robots wowamusic zapsplat.com Affiliates Clearer Thinking GuidedTrack Mind Ease Positly UpLift [Read more]

Showing 1–20 of 25 episodes