EducationCoursesScience

The Structural Engineering Podcast

Max and Zach

Hosted by Max and Zach, The Structural Engineering Podcast dives into the world of structural design, real-world engineering challenges, and the stories behind the structures that shape our world. Whether you're a practicing engineer, an aspiring student, or just curious about how buildings stand tall, tune in for expert insights, industry interviews, and relatable experiences from the field.

Play

Open in

23 episodes
Avg 1 hr 1 min
English

Episodes 23

Newest Oldest Longest

All20 Unplayed20 In progress0 Played0

Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.

S7 · E125
Yesterday · 1 hr 3 min
Episode 125 - The Building Doesn't Match the Drawings
In this episode, we explore the unique challenges of structural engineering in existing buildings, where the drawings don't always match what's actually in the field. We discuss how engineers navigate unknown conditions, undocumented modifications, aging materials, and the constraints that can make seemingly simple projects incredibly complex. We also dive into creative problem solving how to avoid getting stuck on the first workable solution, think beyond conventional approaches, and find better ways to work within an existing structure. From deformation compatibility and load redistribution to constructability and historic building practices, this episode explores what existing buildings can teach us about becoming better structural engineers. Guest Profile: Dan Sloat, S.E., is an Associate Principal with Degenkolb Engineers in Seattle, where his work focuses on structural engineering, seismic evaluation, and the challenges of existing buildings. He earned his B.S. in Structural Engineering from Rice University and his M.S. in Structural Engineering from the University of Washington. Dan is passionate about creative problem solving and finding practical solutions within the constraints of existing structures topics he recently presented on at NASCC: The Steel Conference. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E124
September 9 · 53 min
Episode 124 - Your Concrete Numbers Are Wrong. Does It Matter?
In this episode, we take a closer look at the concrete mixture requirements structural engineers encounter in ACI 318. We explore where the familiar values for water-to-cementitious-material ratio, air content, aggregate size, cement type, and durability requirements come from—and what they mean for the concrete we specify on our projects. We discuss how ACI durability exposure classes influence mixture requirements, including maximum water-to-cementitious-material ratios, minimum specified strength, air entrainment, and other material requirements. Guest Profile: Tyler Ley is a professor and concrete researcher whose work focuses on concrete materials, mixture proportioning, durability, cement chemistry, air entrainment, curing, and field performance. Through his research and educational work, Tyler has become known for making complex concrete concepts accessible to practicing engineers and for emphasizing the connection between concrete mixture design and real-world performance. Links & Resources: Tyler Ley on YouTube: YouTube.com/@TylerLey Tarantula Curve resources: ConcretePavements.org StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd And as promised ~7 videos I really liked to help me learn about concrete mixes: Introduction to Concrete Mix Design How to Make Concrete Last 100 Years Aggregate in Concrete Mix Design Compressive Strength and Water-to-Cement Ratio Why Do We NEED Air Bubbles in Concrete? Intro to Curing Concrete Tarantula Curve Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram LinkedIn Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E123
September 2 · 1 hr 27 min
Episode 123 - What's Next for Structural Steel?
In this episode, we explore what's next for the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) and the future of structural steel. We discuss how AISC's role extends beyond the Steel Manual, how research makes its way into the codes and standards engineers use every day, and the trends shaping the steel industry over the next decade. We also dive into AISC's 2033 Initiative and what it could mean for engineers, fabricators, and the broader steel industry. Finally, we look at the next generation of structural engineers where new graduates are excelling, where they need more development, and what young engineers should learn to become better steel designers. Guest Profile: Dr. Christopher Raebel, P.E., S.E., Ph.D., is Vice President of Engineering and Research at AISC, where he oversees technical activities including standards, research programs, and technical publications. Before joining AISC, Chris spent 12 years in structural engineering practice and later served as a professor, department chair, and director of the Architectural Engineering Program at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. His expertise includes structural steel design, connections, structural robustness, floor vibrations, and engineering education. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E122
August 26 · 58 min
Episode 122 - The Role of Structural Engineers in Resilience
In Episode 122, we explore a question that goes beyond how we design buildings: how do we make our communities more resilient before disaster strikes? We discuss the growing challenges of natural disasters, infrastructure risk, insurance, and the economic consequences of rebuilding after the fact — and why simply designing for the minimum code requirements may not be enough. We also dive into what it means to "future proof" America, and how engineers can play a role in connecting technical solutions with government, finance, insurance, technology, and community investment. From disaster mitigation and resilience standards to finding new ways to fund projects before a disaster occurs, this episode challenges us to think about structural engineering as part of a much larger system of risk and resilience. If you like learning about this side of Engineering check out the Disasters Expo conference in mid-October. Guest Profile: Richard S. Seline is the Chief Executive and Development Officer of ROAR Partners and Executive Director of the Future Proofing America Collaborative. With more than 40 years of experience connecting government, industry, academia, investment, and communities, Richard has worked on hundreds of projects focused on resilience, economic development, and disaster risk mitigation. His work with ROAR and Future Proofing America focuses on shifting the conversation from recovering from disasters to investing in communities before disasters happen — and developing the standards, resources, and financial mechanisms to make that possible. Sponsor: This episode is sponsored by The Resilient Architecture and Structural Engineering Expo. Links & Resources: Richard Seline on YouTube: youtube.com/@rseline Future Proofing America: futureproofingamerica.org — The initiative Richard leads, focused on building a more resilient and future-ready America. Resilience Community Navigator: resiliencecommunitynavigator.org — Resources for navigating community resilience and disaster mitigation. ROAR Partners: roarpartners.co/about — The "think tank-do tank" collaboration behind much of this work. FEMA BRIC Program: FEMA Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities — Federal funding for projects designed to reduce disaster risk and increase community resilience. FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance: FEMA HMA Programs — Overview of federal hazard mitigation funding programs. Fitch Ratings — Climate Vulnerability in Infrastructure Project Finance: Fitch Ratings — Proposed criteria for incorporating climate vulnerability into infrastructure project finance ratings. Stimson Center — Climate-Responsive Resilient Building Codes: Stimson Center — Research on incorporating climate risk and resilience into building codes and standards. World Bank Climate & Disaster Risk Screening Tools: climatescreeningtools.worldbank.org — Tools for assessing climate and disaster risk during project planning. Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E121
August 19 · 1 hr 19 min
Episode 121 - Are Structural Engineers Too Dependent on Codes?
In this episode, we explore the future of structural engineering and what it will take to continue pushing the profession forward. We discuss why innovation can be difficult in a risk-averse industry, how performance-based design is changing the way engineers approach complex structures, and whether our reliance on codes and software is beginning to replace first-principles thinking. We also dive into the growing role of AI in structural engineering—where it could accelerate design and innovation, where it could create new risks, and what should always remain the responsibility of the engineer. Finally, we discuss the curiosity, judgment, and problem-solving skills that will define exceptional structural engineers over the next 50 years. Guest Profile: Ron Klemencic, P.E., S.E., Hon. AIA, is Chairman and CEO of Magnusson Klemencic Associates (MKA) and a recognized leader in structural engineering innovation. Throughout his career, Ron has helped advance performance-based design and pioneered new structural systems, including SpeedCore. His work on complex and high-rise structures around the world has earned him numerous industry honors and membership in the National Academy of Engineering. Sponsor: This episode is sponsored by CalcBook — the modern way to perform and document your structural calculations. Visit calcbook.com and use promo code SEPOD for 50% off your first three months. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E120
August 5 · 1 hr 22 min
Episode 120 – How Glass & Grid Shells Make the Impossible Possible
In this episode, we sit down with Joshua Schultz, Ph.D., P.E., to explore the engineering behind grid shells and structural glass. We discuss how grid shells achieve remarkable long spans through efficient geometry, the role of form-finding and computational design, and the challenges of analysis, connections, and construction. We also dive into structural glass, covering its behavior as a structural material, connection design, redundancy, code development, and the projects pushing the boundaries of transparent architecture. Guest Profile: Joshua Schultz, Ph.D., P.E., LEED AP, is a structural engineer, educator, and author specializing in lightweight structures, structural glass, mass timber, and long-span structural systems. He currently serves as a Professor of Civil Engineering at Gonzaga University while also leading Schultz Engineering as Principal Engineer and Chief Structures Nerd, where he helps architects and engineers develop innovative structural solutions. Earlier in his career, Joshua worked at Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM), contributing to the design of high-profile supertall buildings and advanced façade systems. He is also the author of Structural Design of Lightweight Architecture, a comprehensive guide to the analysis and design of lightweight structural systems. Through his work in practice, research, teaching, and writing, Joshua is helping advance the future of structural engineering by bridging innovative design with practical engineering. Links & Resources: Book - Structural Design of Lightweight Architecture Routledge - https://shorturl.at/qe5Up Amazon - https://shorturl.at/m9Jyb Links of interesting projects Transparent Shell Typology Frei Otto and Gridshell Taiyuan Botanical Garden Transbay Transit Center Grace Farms Joshua's LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshuaschultz StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E119
July 22 · 59 min
Episode 119 - Can Great Engineers Be Bad Leaders?
In Episode 119, we sit down with Travis Slisher to discuss what great leadership looks like in the engineering profession and why technical expertise alone isn't enough to build successful teams. Drawing from his own leadership journey, Travis shares the lessons he's learned about earning trust, communicating effectively, developing future leaders, and creating a culture where engineers feel empowered to grow and contribute. We explore the differences between managing projects and leading people, the common leadership mistakes engineers make as they advance in their careers, and how strong leadership influences everything from team morale to project outcomes. We also discuss how leaders can navigate difficult conversations, maintain accountability during high-pressure projects, and motivate teams through challenging situations. Whether you're an emerging engineer looking to increase your influence or an experienced leader seeking to strengthen your team, this episode offers practical advice that can help you become a more intentional and effective leader. Guest Profile: Travis Slisher is a purpose-driven leader at Professional Engineering Consultants (PEC), where he focuses on developing people, improving processes, and building a culture that helps teams succeed. With extensive experience leading multidisciplinary engineering and construction teams, Travis is passionate about servant leadership, organizational culture, and empowering others to reach their full potential. He is also a Certified Small Giants Leader and an active contributor to workforce and industry development throughout Northern Colorado. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E118
July 8 · 1 hr 3 min
Episode 118 - Do You Really Need Rebar?
In this episode, we sit down with Claire Gandee from Bekaert to explore how steel fiber reinforced concrete is changing the way engineers design slab-on-grade and industrial floor systems. Using two comparable projects, one with conventional reinforcement and one with steel fibers, we discuss how the design process changes, what the fibers are actually doing after concrete cracks, and when steel fibers can replace traditional reinforcing steel. Claire explains how fibers influence crack control, joint spacing, durability, constructability, and long-term performance, while also addressing common misconceptions and practical considerations for specifying fiber reinforced concrete. We also dive into the real-world impacts on cost, schedule, sustainability, and field construction, highlighting where engineers can unlock the greatest value and where conventional reinforcement still has an important role. Whether you design warehouses, data centers, manufacturing facilities, or other concrete slabs, this episode provides practical guidance to help you confidently evaluate when steel fiber reinforced concrete is the right solution. Guest Profile: Claire Gandee, ME, is a senior technical manager at Bekaert, where she works with engineers, owners, and contractors to optimize slab-on-ground and industrial floor systems using steel fiber reinforced concrete. Drawing on her background in concrete design software and structural applications, Claire helps project teams improve constructability, performance, and sustainability through innovative reinforcement solutions. She is a frequent speaker and educator on industrial concrete floors, steel fiber reinforcement, and practical design methodologies. Sponsor: This episode is sponsored by Bekaert Corporation. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E117
June 24 · 1 hr 4 min
Episode 117 - When Design Becomes Evidence
In this episode, we sit down with forensic structural engineer Mark Duckett, PE, SI, from Robson Forensic to explore what happens when engineering decisions are examined long after a project is complete. We discuss the role of expert witnesses, what the legal system means by "standard of care," and how forensic engineers use the scientific method to investigate failures, defects, and construction disputes. Mark explains the difference between simply disagreeing with a design approach and identifying a true breach of professional responsibility, while sharing insights into how root causes are uncovered in complex structural cases. We also explore the skills required to succeed in forensic engineering, the value of technical writing and communication, and what practicing engineers can do today to reduce future risk. Whether you're interested in forensic investigations, expert witness work, or simply becoming a better structural engineer, this episode offers a unique look at our profession through the lens of evidence, accountability, and lessons learned. Guest Profile: Mark Duckett, P.E., S.I., is a forensic structural engineer with nearly 40 years of experience in structural design, inspection, failure analysis, and professional liability investigations. He has designed and inspected everything from custom homes and high-rises to industrial facilities, marine structures, and specialty projects. As an Associate with Robson Forensic, Mark investigates structural failures, construction defects, code compliance issues, and standard-of-care matters, bringing decades of real-world engineering experience to complex disputes and litigation. Sponsor: This episode is sponsored by Robson Forensic. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E116
June 10 · 1 hr 5 min
Episode 116 - Nonlinear Twists: An Easy Path into Complex Structure
In Episode 116, we explore the world of nonlinear structural analysis and performance-based seismic design. We discuss when nonlinear methods become necessary, how pushover analysis helps engineers understand building behavior beyond elastic limits, and where these advanced tools fit within modern codes and standards. The conversation covers modeling challenges, common misconceptions, software workflows, seismic performance objectives, and real-world applications where nonlinear analysis can fundamentally change design decisions. We also look ahead to how increased computing power, AI, and evolving design practices may make advanced analysis more accessible to the next generation of structural engineers. Guest Profile: Anurag Upadhyay, Ph.D., is a freelance technology consultant who specializes in performance-based seismic design, nonlinear analysis, and advanced computational modeling. His work has focused on helping engineers better understand structural behavior beyond elastic limits through tools such as pushover analysis and nonlinear response history analysis. Anurag is also an active educator and developer of open-source resources that make advanced seismic analysis more accessible to practicing engineers. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E115
June 3 · 53 min
Episode 115 - The Gap That Saves Buildings
In this episode, we dive into facade engineering and explore how building skins are designed to accommodate wind, seismic drift, thermal movement, construction tolerances, and long-term building behavior. We discuss the different types of facade systems, the loads they are designed for, and why movement joints are one of the most critical and often misunderstood parts of facade design. The conversation covers slip joints, story drift, facade deflection criteria, joint sizing, masonry veneer challenges, and the coordination required between structural engineers, facade engineers, architects, and contractors. We also discuss common detailing mistakes, constructability concerns, and practical lessons engineers can apply to improve facade performance and reduce costly field issues. Schematic Detail provided by BHB If you would like the presentation slides or access to the presentation recording by Jeff, reach out to him at Jeff.Thomas@bhbengineers.com. Jeff also suggest for additional expertise on this topic, connect with Kirsten Zeydel with Nevell Group. She gives an excellent presentation about all these tricky slip conditions. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kirsten-zeydel-48212495/ Email: kzeydel@nevellgroup.com Additional Resources: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/gcr/2016/NIST.GCR.16-917-38.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com https://www.structuremag.org/article/challenges-in-cladding-design/ https://www.bhbengineers.com/articles/a-new-approach-exterior-metal-stud-design Guest Profile: Jeff Thomas, PE, is a Senior Associate at BHB Structural Engineers with extensive experience in building design, seismic engineering, and project leadership. A graduate of the University of Utah, Jeff has spent his career helping deliver a wide range of structural projects throughout the western United States while mentoring the next generation of engineers. Sponsor: This episode is brought to you by CalcBook, the go-to calculation platform built specifically for structural engineers. Whether you're designing steel connections, concrete members, or timber framing, CalcBook helps you create transparent, organized, and code-referenced calculations in a fraction of the time. Spend less time formatting spreadsheets and more time engineering. Check them out at CalcBook.com. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E114
May 27 · 1 hr
Episode 114 - Yielding for a Better Brace
In Episode 114, we dig into buckling restrained braced frames with Brandt Saxey, SE, of CoreBrace. We talk through how BRBFs work, what makes them different from traditional concentrically braced frames, and why yielding in both tension and compression without global buckling makes them such an effective seismic system. The conversation also covers brace behavior, energy dissipation, detailing considerations, coordination with manufacturers, common design misconceptions, and how BRBs are being used in mass timber and other modern structural systems. Guest Profile: Brandt Saxey, SE, is the VP of Preconstruction Sales / Technical Director at CoreBrace. He brings deep technical experience in buckling restrained brace systems, including design support, preconstruction coordination, and helping engineers understand how BRBFs behave in real projects. His work sits at the intersection of seismic design, constructability, manufacturer coordination, and practical application of BRBs in modern structures. Sponsor: This episode is sponsored by IDEA StatiCa. Download the latest version of IDEA StatiCa Software | IDEA StatiCa 14-Day Free Trial | IDEA StatiCa Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E113
May 20 · 28 min
Episode 113 - How Software Leaders See the Future of Structural Engineering
In this episode, we dig into the future of structural engineering software with the North American CEO and Chief Product Officer of IDEA StatiCa. We talk through why connection design is such a difficult problem to solve digitally, where traditional spreadsheets and simplified checks can fall short, and how engineers can balance speed, analytical rigor, and judgment. The conversation also covers AI, automation, interoperability, software adoption, and what skills young engineers need to build as structural design workflows continue to evolve. Guest Profile: Stephanie Bourgeois Kennard is the North American CEO of IDEA StatiCa, bringing a leadership perspective on software adoption, customer needs, and how structural engineering workflows are evolving across the industry. Vojtěch Chalupa is the Chief Product Officer at IDEA StatiCa, where he helps guide product strategy and development for tools used by structural engineers around the world. His work focuses on improving connection design workflows, interoperability, and practical software solutions for real-world engineering problems. Sponsor: This episode is sponsored by IDEA StatiCa. Download the latest version of IDEA StatiCa Software | IDEA StatiCa 14-Day Free Trial | IDEA StatiCa Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E112
May 13 · 52 min
Episode 112 – Good Connections Make Great Structures
In this episode, we dig into structural connection design and explore why connections are far more than just the final step of a project. We talk through how engineers approach connections as critical components that influence constructability, architectural expression, fabrication efficiency, and even the overall behavior of the structure itself. We break down how engineers think about clean and efficient connection detailing, why exposed connections often require much earlier coordination in the design process, and how lessons from tension structures and "form follows force" design can shape the way engineers approach everyday projects. The conversation also covers the balance between engineering judgment and software automation, the risks of black-box design workflows, how digital tools can improve collaboration between engineers, fabricators, and detailers, and what AI and parametric design may mean for the future of connection engineering. Guest Profile: Andrea Castelo is a Technical Manager - Structural Engineer at IDEA StatiCa specializing in steel connection design, constructability, and engineering workflows that improve collaboration between engineers, detailers, and fabricators. Johan Lozada is a Product Engineer at IDEA StatiCa focused on structural steel connection design, BIM integration, and workflow automation for complex steel structures. Together, they work closely with the structural engineering industry to help engineers solve challenging connection problems and streamline real-world design workflows. Sponsor: This episode is sponsored by IDEA StatiCa. Download the latest version of IDEA StatiCa Software | IDEA StatiCa 14-Day Free Trial | IDEA StatiCa Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E111
April 29 · 1 hr 13 min
Episode 111 - Can Glass Really Be Structural?
In this episode, we dig into structural glass design and explore why glass in buildings can be far more than a transparent enclosure. We talk through how engineers approach glass as a true structural material in systems where stiffness, redundancy, detailing, and post-breakage behavior can be just as important as ultimate strength. We break down how engineers think about glass in tension, compression, and bending, how laminated assemblies and interlayers improve resilience, and why connections often control the performance of the entire system. The conversation also covers the differences between annealed, heat-strengthened, and fully tempered glass, how standards and testing inform design, common misconceptions about brittleness and safety, and why close collaboration between architects, fabricators, and engineers is essential when ambitious transparent structures are the goal. Guest Profile: Matt Soda, P.Eng., PE, SE is a Structural Project Engineer with RJC Engineers, where he specializes in structural glass and facade engineering. His work focuses on delivering high-performance glass systems that balance architectural vision with structural behavior, constructability, and long-term durability. He brings hands-on experience designing elegant transparent structures and insight into one of the most technically demanding materials used in modern construction. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Excellent references for architects and engineers interested in glass design: Home - Structural Glass Design Manual Erin Mills Town Centre – Globe Structure | glassonweb.com Structural Glass Engineering in North America - RJC Engineers Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E110
April 15 · 1 hr 7 min
Episode 110 - Venues Aren't "Just Code": Vibration, Rigging & Mall Reuse
In this episode, we dig into entertainment and retail design and explore why venues can't be engineered by code compliance alone. We talk through how structural engineers approach performance-driven spaces like concert venues, theaters, and experiential retail where vibration, rigging, sightlines, and serviceability often control the design more than strength. We break down how engineers think about vibration tolerance and human perception, how rigging grids are designed for unknown future shows, and why exposed structure can either elevate architecture or become a liability. The conversation also covers adaptive reuse of malls and anchor boxes, what engineers look for when evaluating existing buildings, common misconceptions about reuse and overbuilding, how structural testing and "detective work" inform decisions, and why early engineering involvement is critical when design intent is ambitious but budgets and sites are constrained. Guest Profile: Travis Corigliano, PE, SE, is a Principal at Magnusson Klemencic Associates (MKA) in Seattle, where he leads the firm's Retail & Entertainment market sector. His work focuses on designing spaces where people actively choose to go like concert venues, immersive entertainment, and redeveloped retail environments balancing strong architectural intent with structural performance, constructability, and long‑term flexibility. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Structural Trivia: Sign up for our structural trivia! A quick email mid-week will keep you sharp. Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E109
April 1 · 1 hr 1 min
Episode 109 – How Coastal Structures Hold Back the Ocean
In this episode, we dig into flood and wave design and explore when water transitions from a site consideration into a true structural load case. We talk through how engineers identify flood risk, interpret FEMA flood maps, and determine when flood, wave, or debris loads must be considered—especially for engineers who typically design in dry conditions. We break down the difference between flood loads and wave impact, how elevated structures, piles, and breakaway walls behave under water-driven forces, and where standard structural intuition starts to fall apart. The conversation also covers how ASCE 7, ASCE 24, and FEMA guidance are used in practice, common misconceptions around seawalls and shoreline protection, how engineers communicate risk to clients, and what the future of coastal design may look like as conditions continue to evolve. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Structural Trivia: Sign up for our structural trivia! A quick email mid-week will keep you sharp. Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E109
March 18 · 52 min
Episode 108 - What LEGO Can Teach Structural Engineers
In this episode, we explore structural engineering through an unexpected lens: LEGO. What starts as a simple building toy becomes a powerful way to explain fundamental concepts like load paths, stability, and structural behavior. We discuss how the idea began, why physical models can communicate more clearly than sketches or equations, and the first moment it became clear this approach actually works. The conversation highlights which concepts translate best to LEGO, where the analogies break down, and how to balance simplicity with technical accuracy. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Structural Trivia: Sign up for our structural trivia! A quick email mid-week will keep you sharp. Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E107
March 4 · 57 min
Episode 107 – The Structural Logic of High‑End Residential Design
In this episode, we explore the realities of high‑end residential structural engineering, using custom homes in the Hamptons to examine how architectural ambition, homeowner expectations, and constructability intersect. Although single‑family homes dominate the U.S. building stock, this conversation shows why residential work especially at the high end demands careful coordination and judgment. We discuss how the engineer–architect–owner relationship shapes project outcomes, how engineers respond to open‑concept demands and social‑media‑driven ideas, and where early decisions can either unlock or constrain the design. The conversation also dives into renovations, including when selective demolition is necessary, common surprises hidden in existing construction, and how engineers adapt when plans change midstream. Finally, we reflect on lessons learned from managing scope creep and value engineering, to coordinating with contractors and mechanical systems, to handling complex roofs and tight architectural tolerances. The episode closes with practical advice for engineers new to residential work and insights that often surprise those coming from commercial design. Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Structural Trivia: Sign up for our structural trivia! A quick email mid-week will keep you sharp. Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Sponsor: This episode is brought to you by CalcBook, the go-to calculation platform built specifically for structural engineers. Whether you're designing steel connections, concrete members, or timber framing, CalcBook helps you create transparent, organized, and code-referenced calculations in a fraction of the time. Spend less time formatting spreadsheets and more time engineering. Check them out at CalcBook.com. Disclaimer: Here
S7 · E106
February 18 · 49 min
Episode 106 - Mast Frame: Rethinking Seismic Systems
In this episode, we take a deep dive into mast frames a hybrid seismic system that challenges the traditional boundaries between elastic and energy‑dissipating components. Using the Samuel Merritt University project as a case study, we unpack why the design team stepped away from conventional BRB‑only frames and moment‑frame/dual systems, and instead embraced a BRBM (Buckling‑Restrained Brace + Mast) approach. We explore how mast frames redistribute stiffness, improve drift control, and preserve architectural openness in ways that standard systems struggle to match. From nonlinear response history analysis to capacity design of mast members, we walk through the technical decisions that shaped the system. We also get into the practical realities detailing strategies that allow the mast to rock, base connections that handle massive overturning forces, and the construction challenges of erecting a tall, stiff truss inside a transparent building. Finally, we zoom out to discuss where mast frames fit in the future of seismic design. Will hybrid systems like BRBM become more common in dense urban environments? How might codes evolve to better capture their behavior? And what lessons should engineers carry forward before attempting a similar system on their own project? Links & Resources: StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd Structural Trivia: Sign up for our structural trivia! A quick email mid-week will keep you sharp. Reach out to us: TheEngineeringPodcast.com Instagram Linkedin Sponsor: This episode is sponsored by NEXT Insurance; affordable, engineer-friendly liability coverage starting at just $29/month, designed to give structural engineers the protection they need with zero hassle. Go to NextInsurance.com/sepodcast and get a free quote today! Disclaimer: Here

Showing 1–20 of 23 episodes