Skip to content
Artwork for The Constitution Study podcast
GovernmentEducation

The Constitution Study podcast

Paul Engel: Author, speaker and podcaster

Join a group of Everyday Americans as we learn to read and study the Constitution, and teach the rising generation to live free.

Play
  • 21 episodes
  • weekly
  • Avg 20 min
  • English
Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.
  • #537
    Monday · 19 min

    537 - Keeping Girls Safe

    Should those with a mental illness be allowed to scare and stalk our wives and daughters in pursuit of their disease? Can public schools protect our young ladies, or shall mental illness supersede the law, biology, and common sense?

  • #536
    August 17 · 23 min

    536 - Defining Election Day

    When is Election Day? Is it defined as the day the ballots are marked or received by election officials. That is the heart of the question in the case Watson v. RNC, and the court's decision will impact more than just Mississippi.

  • #535
    August 10 · 20 min

    535 - Hawaii's Attack on Property Rights

    Who decides who can carry a firearm on your property and under what conditions? Does the Second Amendment presume permission or restriction? According to the Hawaiian legislature, they decide who carries and presumes restriction.

  • #534
    August 3 · 25 min

    534 - Geofence Warrants

    We all walk around with tracking devices on, cellphones. While these devices report our location on an almost second by second basis, what are the rules law enforcement has to follow to search that data?

  • #533
    July 27 · 21 min

    533 - EPA vs State's Rights

    I've heard a lot of people talking about the Monsanto case and the claims that one of their products, Roundup, may cause cancer. However, the case before the Supreme Court was much more unique, involving state's rights, intrastate commerce, and the limits of federal law and regulation.

  • #532
    July 20 · 23 min

    532 - Birthright Citizenship at SCOTUS

    In one of the most anticipated opinions of this Supreme Court Term, Trump v. Barbara questions whether an Executive Order with language that mirrors the Constitution is actually constitutional. I believe that history will remember this opinion as one of the dumbest of any Supreme Court in history.

  • #531
    July 13 · 18 min

    531 - The Second Amendment and Your Right to Live Free

    During the debates about the ratification of the Constitution, one of the questions involved the need for a Bill of Rights. One of the arguments against such a document was the idea that some may consider the listing of rights in the Constitution as permission to regulate those rights. We find an example of just such attempt to regulate rights in the Supreme Court case United States v. Hemani. Specifically, can the federal government deny your right to keep and bear arms if you use your liberty to use marijuana.

  • #530
    July 4 · 16 min

    530 - Semiquincentennial

    Today, July 4th 2026, is the semiquincentennial, the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Two hundred and fifty years is certainly an anniversary worth celebrating. Sadly, in our exuberance to celebrate, many have also shown their ignorance both of the document and our history. Today, in honor of the semiquincentennial, I want to look at both the history and the document that was such a turning point in our history.

  • #529
    June 29 · 13 min

    529 - Are You Smarter Than a Naturalized Citizen?

    Most of us probably remember the TV Game Show "Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader", where contestants attempted to answer fifth grade questions for prizes. The answers given were often hilarious. What if they weren't fifth grade questions, but civics questions? Would that answer the American people give still be funny?

  • #528
    June 22 · 14 min

    528 - Interstate Commerce

    The Constitution delegates to Congress the power to regulate commerce "among the several States". What makes commerce not just commerce interstate? That's part of the question the Supreme Court was asked to answer in the case Flowers v. Brock.

  • #527
    June 15 · 21 min

    527 - Racial Gerrymandering

    Racism is wrong. At least that's what I've been told my entire life. But if racism is wrong, why do so many people demand we make decisions based on race? Is an election fair if the people are vote are racially chosen? If it was wrong for people to be denied the representation because of their race, why is it OK for them to deny representation to others for the same reason? Is choosing representation based on race is wrong? That is the question presented to the Supreme Court in the case LOUISIANA v. CALLAIS ET AL.

  • #526
    June 8 · 17 min

    526 - Use of Lethal Force

    When is the use of lethal force legal in the United State? In every state of the union, lethal force can be used to protect an innocent part from an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury. But is that the only time? A recently signed bill in Tennessee defines other situations where deadly force can lawfully be used within the state.

  • #525
    June 1 · 16 min

    525 - The Frightful Despotism of Political Parties

    George Washington warned us that political parties bring their own frightful despotism. From gerrymandering to primaries, We the People have allowed political parties to not only rule our elections, but to poison our interactions with their venom and hatred. Will we continue to let these private organizations drag the United States into the ash heap of history?

  • #524
    May 25 · 24 min

    524 - First Choice v. New Jersey

    Contrary to what the Supreme Court believed in both the Roe and Dobbs decision, the question of abortion has not been settled in the United States. The case of First Choice v. New Jersey shows just how far some states will go to oppose the pro-life movement.

  • #523
    May 18 · 11 min

    523 - Marriage and the Fourteenth Amendment

    In 2015 the Supreme Court decided in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, that the Fourteenth Amendment protected the right for homosexuals to get marriage. In 2026 the State of Tennessee is working on legislation that points out that private groups are organizations are not bound by the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore by Obergefell.

  • #522
    May 11 · 17 min

    522 - Free Speech in Colorado

    In the recent case Chiles v. Salazar, the Supreme Court was asked if Colorado's "Conversion Therapy" law violated the Ms. Chiles right to free speech. As is so often the case, the court agreed that the law violated Ms. Chiles free speech rights, just for the wrong reasons.

  • #521
    May 4 · 19 min

    521 - Freedom's Extinction

    Ronald Reagan once said that "Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction." Is this the generation when that finally happens? You may think I'm being hyperbolic, but I think the evidence supports the possibility that this is true.

  • #520
    April 27 · 24 min

    520 - Birthright Citizenship at Oral Arguments

    Does anyone who is born on our land automatically receive citizenship? Not according to the Fourteenth Amendment, but that hasn't stopped the courts from messing this up. Which is exactly what I expect from the Supreme Court in the case Trump v. Barbara.

  • #519
    April 20 · 27 min

    519 - Defining Election Day

    Congress gets to set Election Day, at least for federal offices. But is Election Day defined as the day the votes are cast, or the day they are counted? That is the question in the case Watson v. RNC.

  • #518
    April 13 · 26 min

    518 - Legalized Theft

    You've probably heard of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. But does the Constitution allow a county to take and sell someones land to make a profit? That is the main question in the case Pung v Isabella County.

Showing 1–20 of 21 episodes