Scream Creeps

Jeremy Willey

A horror podcast talking about everything horror with The Heart of Geek group. We will talk about anything from tropes to comparisons and all else horror. We hope you enjoy :)

Play

Open in

22 episodes
daily
Avg 34 min
English

Episodes 22

Newest Oldest Longest

All20 Unplayed20 In progress0 Played0

Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.

S3 · E16
Today · 33 min
Freddy vs. Jason Explained: Why This Horror Crossover Still Works
Summary In this episode, we explore the iconic horror crossover Freddy vs. Jason, analyzing the characters, the battles, and what makes this film a standout in horror history. Join us as we dissect the clash of two legendary villains and what it reveals about horror storytelling. Key Topics The characters and their unique horror styles The narrative and strategic manipulation of Freddy and Jason The iconic kills and spectacle moments The significance of the final showdown location The psychological vs. physical horror dynamics The cultural impact and fan debates about the film The role of dream manipulation and physical force The character development and actor performances Sound Bites "Freddy enjoys making you suffer" "Jason is the unstoppable nightmare" "Freddy gets the last laugh" Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Freddy vs. Jason and its significance 01:52 The origins of Freddy Krueger and Jason Voorhees 04:03 Freddy's need for fear and his manipulation of Jason 06:05 Jason's unstoppable physical force and role in the story 07:57 The group of teenagers and their role in the plot 10:09 The iconic kills and spectacle moments 12:04 The dream world versus physical world tactics 14:05 The final showdown at Crystal Lake 15:56 Who really wins in the battle of horror icons? 18:02 The cultural impact and fan debates 20:01 The legacy of Freddy vs. Jason and its entertainment value
S3 · E15
Yesterday · 42 min
The Body Horror Masterpiece That Turns Science Into a Nightmare
Summary In this episode, we explore the horror and tragedy of David Cronenberg's The Fly, focusing on its themes of obsession, body horror, and the consequences of scientific hubris. We analyze the film's transformation of a classic story into a dark, visceral experience and discuss what makes it a masterpiece of body horror. Key Topics The central theme of obsession and transformation in The Fly Comparison between the original 1958 film and Cronenberg's 1986 remake The practical effects and makeup that brought Seth Brundle's transformation to life The emotional and tragic dimension of Seth's character arc The role of Veronica as a witness and victim of Seth's transformation The significance of the telepods and scientific hubris in the story The film's exploration of losing control over one's body and identity The impact of body horror effects on audience perception and fear The film's ending and its message about the consequences of scientific hubris Sound bites "The human body is a pretty fragile thing." "The mirror isn't showing Seth a monster, it's showing what he's becoming." "If someone is changing beyond recognition, when do you stop being able to save them?" Chapters 00:00 Introduction to The Fly and its themes 02:07 The human body's fragility and body horror 13:10 The mirror as a symbol of transformation 28:23 The question of saving someone beyond recognition 40:22 What we take away from The Fly
S3 · E14
Sunday · 42 min
The Sixth Sense’s Twist Works Because It Changes Everything You Already Saw
Summary In this episode, we delve into the iconic film The Sixth Sense, exploring its themes of grief, supernatural communication, and the power of perception. Join us as we analyze the film's storytelling, characters, and the masterful twist that redefined the horror genre. Key Topics The film's plot and themes of grief and communication Character analysis of Cole Sear and Dr. Malcolm Crow Use of visual storytelling and color symbolism The film's twist ending and its impact on storytelling The emotional core of the movie and its message about loss Takeaways The power of subtle visual cues and color symbolism in storytelling The importance of emotional depth in horror films How the twist redefines the entire narrative upon rewatching The significance of the relationship between Malcolm and Cole The film's approach to portraying ghosts as misunderstood and tragic Sound Bites "Malcolm's dead the whole time" "The twist changes everything" "Subtle clues make the story richer" Chapters 00:00 Introduction to The Sixth Sense and its significance 02:01 Overview of the film's plot and main characters 03:58 Character analysis of Dr. Malcolm Crow 05:58 The role of Cole Sear and his unique perspective 07:55 Visual storytelling and use of color symbolism 10:04 The ghosts in the film and their meanings 11:57 The relationship between Malcolm and Cole 13:54 The twist ending and its significance 16:05 Rewatching the film with new insights 17:58 The emotional impact and themes of grief and acceptance 20:06 The film's legacy and influence on horror and thriller genres
S3 · E13
Saturday · 35 min
Inside Gatlin - The Cornfield Cult That Turned Children Into Killers
Summary In this episode, we delve into the terrifying concept of killer kids in horror movies, focusing on Stephen King's Children of the Corn. We explore the themes of innocence turned sinister, supernatural influences, and the cultural impact of this iconic film. Key Topics The premise and background of Children of the Corn The portrayal of children as villains in horror The influence of supernatural forces and cults The themes of innocence, faith, and manipulation The film's cultural impact and legacy Sound Bites "Sometimes the thing you should be running from looks completely innocent." "He who walks behind the rose is waiting." "Worshiping something you can't control can be dangerous." Chapters 00:00 Introduction to the horror of killer kids 01:51 Setting the scene in Gatlin, Nebraska 03:56 The children’s society and their beliefs 06:00 Isaac and Malachi: Leaders of the children 08:06 The supernatural entity: He who walks behind the rows 10:01 The town’s dark history and the fate of adults 11:59 The horror of the cornfield and its symbolism 14:01 The psychological manipulation and cult dynamics 16:00 The film’s special effects and atmosphere 18:01 Survival strategies and the horror check 20:01 The ending and lingering questions about evil 21:58 The cultural legacy of Children of the Corn
S3 · E12
Friday · 37 min
Train to Busan Is More Than a Zombie Movie—it’s a Father’s Redemption Story
Summary In this episode, we analyze the South Korean zombie film Train to Busan, exploring its themes of sacrifice, humanity, and survival in a fast-paced, intense setting. We discuss character arcs, innovative zombie portrayals, and the social commentary woven into this acclaimed horror movie. Key Topics The rapid spread of the zombie virus and its implications Character arcs and development, especially Siok Wu and Sang Hua Innovative zombie portrayals: speed, agility, and behavior The use of the train as a moving environment and its symbolism Themes of sacrifice, humanity, and societal collapse The social commentary embedded in the story The importance of character relationships and emotional stakes The film's cinematography and visual storytelling Comparison with other zombie movies and genre reinventions The cultural significance of South Korean horror cinema Takeaways The speed of the zombies in Train to Busan changes the traditional horror dynamic. Character development, especially the transformation of Siok Wu, is central to the story's emotional impact. The train setting creates a unique, claustrophobic environment that enhances tension. The film demonstrates that societal collapse can be as terrifying as the zombies themselves. Selfishness and heroism are contrasted through the characters' choices. The movie highlights the importance of compassion and sacrifice in crisis. South Korean cinema continues to innovate within the horror genre. The physical makeup and movement of zombies contribute significantly to their frightening nature. The social commentary on human nature under stress is a core element. Rewatching reveals deeper themes of relationships and societal critique. Sound Bites "These zombies are ridiculously fast." "The daughter sees what her father doesn't." "He walks to the back of the train and jumps." Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Train to Busan and its significance 02:03 The outbreak begins and the rapid spread of the virus 04:15 Zombie behavior: speed, agility, and behavior 06:42 Character analysis: Siok Wu and his transformation 08:37 The daughter Suan: perceptiveness and compassion 10:08 Sang Hua: the hero with a heart 12:51 The pregnant wife and the stakes for Sang Hua 14:00 The threat of selfishness and moral choices 15:22 Use of tunnels and dark environments for survival 16:30 The train as a moving environment and its symbolism 17:58 The final stand and the ending 22:13 The emotional farewell and sacrifice 23:30 Why Train to Busan stands out in horror genre
S3 · E11
Thursday · 27 min
Evil Dead II: Horror Comedy, Chainsaws, and the Deadite Problem
Jeremy and Josh break down Evil Dead II as a horror comedy that works because it refuses to choose between terrifying and absurd. They cover the film’s core setup, Ash Williams’ transformation, Sam Raimi’s kinetic camera style, and why the practical effects still land today.This episode is a review and appreciation piece for the 1987 film, with Jeremy leading the analysis and Josh adding reactions, favorite moments, and comparisons to the wider Evil Dead franchise. If you want a quick sense of why Ash became a horror icon, this one gets straight to it. Key topics Jeremy sets up the film’s premise: Ash and Linda head to a secluded cabin, find Professor Raymond Noby’s recording, and accidentally unleash the evil in the woods. The Necronomicon Ex Mortis gets discussed as the worst possible book to find in a cabin, with the episode leaning hard into the classic horror logic of “do not read the creepy book.” Jeremy explains how the cabin itself becomes a character, with trapdoors, cellar danger, possessed objects, and the sense that every room wants to kill you. The possessed hand sequence is singled out as one of the movie’s most famous scenes, and both hosts treat it as the perfect mix of violence, slapstick, and escalating chaos. Josh highlights the film’s funniest and most memorable beats, especially Ash putting on the chainsaw, the shotgun moments, and the chase scenes involving the Deadites. The Deadites are described as demons using human bodies rather than zombies or ghosts, and their unpredictability is what makes them so effective. Jeremy and Josh both point to Ash Williams as the reason the movie works so well, since Bruce Campbell turns a beat-up, unlucky survivor into an icon. Sam Raimi’s camera work gets a lot of praise, especially the POV shots racing through the woods and the sense that the camera itself is part of the evil. Josh shares a behind-the-scenes note about Henrietta being played in costume by Ted Raimi, adding a franchise trivia moment to the discussion. The episode closes by comparing Evil Dead II to the rest of the franchise, including Army of Darkness, and by reinforcing the film’s horror comedy blueprint. Timestamps 00:00 - Cabin setup and why the creepy book is always a bad idea 00:54 - Day eight of Scream Creeps and the horror comedy theme 01:24 - Why Evil Dead II is not a normal horror movie 02:27 - Ash and Linda arrive at the cabin and find the recording 03:10 - The Necronomicon Ex Mortis and why it should never be opened 03:49 - The forest wakes up and Ash gets trapped 04:46 - The cabin as a horror character with no safe room 05:23 - Ash becomes the lone survivor and starts fighting back 05:49 - The possessed hand sequence begins 06:26 - Why the crawling severed hand is both gross and hilarious 06:51 - Ash’s transformation into the iconic version of the character 07:21 - Annie Noby arrives with Jake and Bobby Joe 08:04 - What makes the Deadites different from zombies or ghosts 09:02 - Sam Raimi’s camera as an active part of the horror 10:04 - Ted Raimi as Henrietta and the costume nightmare 11:12 - The Evil POV shot through the woods 11:40 - Chainsaw arm and the birth of an icon 12:17 - The boomstick and the forest turning hostile 13:32 - The cabin seeming to come alive 14:02 - The laughing deer head and Ash losing it 14:30 - The Necronomicon as the key to stopping the evil 14:59 - The final portal plan and total chaos 15:29 - Ash is pulled into the vortex and the ending shifts 16:12 - Why the movie works: Bruce Campbell, Raimi, and tone 17:10 - Horror and comedy happening at the same time 17:36 - The horror check and how scary the movie really is 18:01 - Josh’s favorite moments, including the chainsaw and slapstick 19:54 - Jeremy picks the possessed hand as the best moment 20:21 - Best character: Ash Williams 23:05 - Josh’s favorite Deadite moments, including Henrietta 24:27 - Why the Deadites are scary because they are unpredictable 25:11 - The practical effects showcase 26:11 - Why the movie still holds up today 27:01 - Rob Tappert and the film’s sequel slash reimagining status 27:31 - How Army of Darkness continues the story 27:35 - Would you read the Necronomicon? Josh says absolutely not 29:24 - What would make you quit if you were in Ash’s shoes 30:16 - Why Ash became one of horror’s most recognizable characters 30:45 - Final verdict on Evil Dead II and why it rules as horror comedy 31:24 - Closing recap and the lesson: never read the creepy book Notable quotes “This movie is basically a horror movie having a nervous breakdown.” “Horror with a chainsaw shaped sense of humor.” “Never, ever read from the creepy book.”
S3 · E10
Wednesday · 26 min
Tremors: Why the Ground Is the Monster
Jeremy and Josh kick off day seven of their Scream Creeps 31 Days of Halloween series with a breakdown of Tremors, the 1990 creature feature directed by Ron Underwood and starring Kevin Bacon, Fred Ward, Finn Carter, Michael Gross, Reba McIntyre, Victor Wong, and Ariana Richards. They focus on what makes the movie work so well: a simple but terrifying premise, smart characters, practical effects, and monsters that turn everyday movement into a survival problem.In this episode: Jeremy frames Tremors as a monster movie where the real threat is the ground itself, not a house, forest, or slasher in the dark. They introduce Val McKee and Earl Bassett as reluctant small-town handymen who want out of Perfection, Nevada before the attacks start. The discussion covers the first warnings, including Edgar Deems found dead atop a utility pole and the growing realization that something underground is hunting the town. Jeremy explains the core Graboid rule set: the creatures hunt by sensing vibrations, so walking, driving, and even standing still in the wrong place can be dangerous. Josh points out how smart the characters are written, especially Val, Earl, Bert Gummer, and Rhonda LeBeck, and how that makes the survival scenes more satisfying. Bert Gummer becomes a major highlight of the episode, with Jeremy and Josh both praising Michael Gross’s paranoid survivalist as the most memorable character in the film. Rhonda’s role as a seismology student matters because she helps identify the underground threat and gives the group a scientific way to understand the attacks. They talk through the movie’s practical problem-solving set pieces, including using vehicles, higher ground, and solid rock to escape the creatures. The Gummer household gets special attention as one of horror’s best prepared homes, with Heather proving she is just as capable as Bert when the danger hits. The episode closes by arguing that Tremors still holds up because it blends horror, comedy, action, and western energy around one unforgettable idea. Timestamps: 00:00 - A desert nightmare opens the episode 01:11 - Introducing Tremors and the 1990 cast 02:14 - Valentine McKee and Earl Bassett want out of Perfection 03:37 - Edgar Deems on the utility pole and the first warning signs 04:12 - Why the monster-from-below concept works 04:51 - The first major Graboid reveal 06:32 - The movie establishes rules and survival logic 07:06 - Bert Gummer and Rhonda LeBeck enter the story 08:22 - Why the general store sequence is so memorable 10:42 - Vehicles help and hurt in a vibration-based hunt 11:09 - Even buildings are not safe 12:05 - Finding solid rock and higher ground 13:00 - Val and Earl’s teamwork under pressure 14:40 - Bert’s weapon stash and the fortress house 15:12 - Heather Gummer and the best prepared household in horror 15:33 - Why the deaths matter in a movie like this 16:59 - The survivors stop running and make a plan 17:26 - Explosives, rocks, and the final confrontation 18:23 - Why the ending works and why the cast clicks 19:38 - The Scream Creeps horror check: how scary is Tremors? 20:09 - Josh’s favorite moment: the pipe bombs and store destruction 21:05 - Bert Gummer as the best character 22:05 - Best Graboid moment and practical effects praise 23:30 - Why the creatures still look great today 23:55 - Does Tremors hold up now? 25:01 - What would you do if the graboids showed up? 26:13 - The official Graboid survival guide 27:03 - What if graboids existed in the real world? 28:10 - Why the Graboids belong in monster movie history 29:48 - Final thoughts on the movie’s lasting appeal 30:42 - Closing the day-seven Halloween entry
S3 · E9
October 6 · 29 min
Hocus Pocus: Witchy Halloween Chaos in Salem
This episode covers Hocus Pocus as part of the Scream Creeps 31 Days of Halloween, with Josh and Jeremy breaking down why the movie works as a Halloween watch. They focus on the Sanderson sisters, the black flame candle, Binks, and the film’s balance of creepy imagery and comedy.In this episode, Josh and Jeremy explore why Hocus Pocus became a Halloween staple rather than a traditional horror movie. They also dig into the characters, the music, the practical effects, and what makes the movie rewatchable every October. Key topics We discuss why Hocus Pocus fits the “witchy” theme even though it leans more fantasy-comedy than straight horror. Jeremy sets up the Sanderson sisters Winifred, Mary, and Sarah as the core of the movie’s conflict and comedy. The Salem setting is treated as a major part of the film’s identity, giving the story its Halloween atmosphere. Josh and Jeremy break down the black flame candle and how Max lighting it triggers the whole nightmare. They cover the Sanderson sisters’ goal of stealing children’s life force before sunrise. Winifred is singled out as the standout villain, with Bet Midler’s performance driving many of the movie’s best moments. Mary’s child-sniffing ability and Sarah’s distracted personality are both highlighted as key parts of the sister dynamic. Binks and Thackeray Banks are discussed as one of the most emotional parts of the story. Billy Butcherson gets attention as an unexpectedly fun zombie revenge character who breaks away from Winifred. The Halloween party scene and “I Put a Spell on You” are identified as the movie’s defining sequence. They note how the comedy undercuts the creepiness without removing the stakes entirely. The episode closes by arguing that Hocus Pocus works because it became a Halloween tradition, not just a movie. Timestamps (00:00) Cold open and accidental start (01:02) Why this counts as the witchy pick for day six (01:28) Why Hocus Pocus is more Halloween fantasy than straight horror (02:52) Salem, the Sanderson sisters, and the film’s opening setup (04:39) Max Dennison arrives as the skeptical outsider (05:40) Danny’s fearlessness and why she matters (06:14) Allison as the history-aware survivor (06:40) The black flame candle and the rules for bringing the witches back (07:03) Max lights the candle and the sisters return (08:05) Winifred Sanderson as the standout villain (08:51) Mary’s loyalty and her disturbing child-sniffing gag (09:24) Sarah’s playful, chaotic energy (09:54) Binks and the tragedy of Thackeray Banks (10:20) Winifred’s spell book and its blinking eye (11:18) The witches discover the modern world (11:52) Broomstick chaos and the vacuum cleaner gag (12:33) The Halloween party and “I Put a Spell on You” (15:03) Billy Butcherson enters the story (16:19) The countdown to sunrise (17:00) The final plan and cemetery confrontation (18:01) The Sanderson sisters are defeated (18:14) Binks is finally freed (22:39) The Scream Creeps horror check (24:48) Favorite scenes and character picks (26:59) Why the music is such a huge part of the movie (27:21) Practical effects and why the film still holds up (28:13) Why Hocus Pocus is a rewatchable October movie (30:09) What kind of anthology stories the characters would get (31:04) Would you light the black flame candle? (31:46) What spell would you use if you had the spell book? (32:39) Why the movie became a Halloween tradition (33:28) Final thoughts on why the movie is fun, creepy, and iconic Notable quotes “Tonight we’re gonna go witch hunting.” “If you light that candle, you aren’t getting a fun Halloween night. You’re getting three undead witches.” “Sometimes you just need witches flying through the sky on vacuum cleaners.”
S3 · E8
October 5 · 41 min
Creepshow: Five Horror Stories, One Comic Book Nightmare
Jeremy and Josh break down Creepshow, the 1982 horror anthology from George A. Romero and Stephen King. They focus on how the movie turns five separate stories into one cohesive experience by embracing the look, tone, and pacing of a horror comic book.This episode matters because it’s not just a movie recap - it’s also a comparison of anthology horror as a format. Jeremy leads the review, while Josh adds fan memories, favorite segments, and reactions to the movie’s most memorable kills and gross-out scenes. Key topics In this episode, Jeremy explains why Creep Show works so well as anthology horror - it gives viewers five different nightmares instead of one long story, and each segment resets the stakes They break down the movie’s comic book identity - exaggerated colors, panel-style transitions, theatrical performances, sound effects, and the recurring host known as the Creep Josh recalls how Father’s Day hit him personally - especially Nathan Grantham’s “give me my cake” scene, which became a running joke with friends Jeremy and Josh revisit “The Lonesome Death of Jordy Verrill” - Stephen King plays a foolish country man who touches a meteor and gets overtaken by alien plant growth They discuss “Something to Tide You Over” - a revenge story starring Leslie Nielsen and Ted Danson that turns a beach burial into a supernatural payoff They dig into “The Crate” - the hidden monster segment with practical effects that both hosts consider one of the movie’s most memorable stories “They’re Creeping Up on You” gets singled out as the grossest segment - the insect infestation scene is the episode’s biggest nightmare fuel moment Jeremy frames the movie as a masterclass in dark humor and practical effects - it balances gore, comedy, and comic-book absurdity without losing its identity Josh highlights the movie’s camp and rewatchability - he says it’s one of the films that helped pull him into horror in the first place They end by naming the easiest stories to survive - mainly “Jordy Verrill” if you avoid the meteor, and “The Crate” if you never open it Timestamps 00:00 - Opening the Halloween anthology theme 00:56 - Why Creep Show feels like a horror comic 02:49 - Romero, Stephen King, and the movie’s five-story structure 04:00 - The Creep as the movie’s comic book host 04:27 - Josh introduces “Father’s Day” from memory 07:07 - Nathan Grantham returns for revenge 11:43 - Wrapping up “Father’s Day” and its bloody payoff 13:00 - “The Lonesome Death of Jordy Verrill” begins 14:22 - Meteor infection and alien plant body horror 16:58 - Why the Jordy story works as goofy horror 17:31 - “Something to Tide You Over” and beach revenge 19:40 - Revenge horror gets its supernatural payoff 22:22 - “The Crate” and the warning not to open it 23:25 - Henry Northup and the practical monster effects 24:34 - The crate closes, but the danger is not over 26:10 - Enter “They’re Creeping Up on You” 27:55 - Bugs, contamination, and the sealed apartment nightmare 28:53 - The grossest body horror in the film 32:42 - Why the five stories work as one anthology 33:46 - Stephen King and George A. Romero’s influence 35:36 - The Scream Creeps horror check 36:51 - Favorite story: Father’s Day vs. The Crate 38:25 - Favorite character and favorite monster 40:00 - Why the practical effects still hold up 42:53 - Which story could you survive? 44:24 - Why horror fans always open the page 45:54 - Closing thoughts on anthology horror Notable quotes “Five stories, five nightmares, one hell of a horror comic.” “You don’t open the crate.” “Horror fans are idiots. We know something terrible is coming.”
S3 · E7
October 4 · 35 min
Child’s Play and the Horror of the Killer Doll
Jeremy and Josh continue Scream Creeps’ 31 Days of Halloween with a look at Child’s Play, the 1988 slasher icon that turns a child’s toy into a nightmare. They break down why Chucky works so well: he’s small, funny, vicious, and impossible to ignore. The conversation focuses on the film’s premise, its practical effects, and how the movie uses disbelief and vulnerability to make a doll one of horror’s most recognizable killers. Key topics In this episode, Jeremy frames Child’s Play as day four of the Halloween marathon and positions it as a slasher icon movie centered on Chucky. Jeremy explains the film’s core setup: serial killer Charles Lee Ray uses voodoo to transfer his soul into a Good Guy doll after being chased by Detective Mike Norris. Jeremy and Josh discuss how the movie works because it corrupts something innocent, turning a colorful children’s toy into a violent threat. They talk about Karen Barclay’s role as the skeptical parent who cannot easily believe her son when Andy says the doll is alive. Josh points out how the franchise keeps the focus on Andy, and how the series continues the idea of Chucky trying to get out of the doll body. Jeremy highlights Brad Dourif’s voice performance as a major reason Chucky feels distinct, since he sounds like an angry human being rather than a vague supernatural monster. They discuss the design of the Good Guy doll and how its cheerful appearance makes Chucky easier to hide in plain sight. Josh brings up the ritual and the longer-term body transfer rule, and Jeremy notes the ticking-clock effect of Chucky becoming more human the longer he stays trapped. They compare Chucky to other slashers like Michael Myers, Jason Voorhees, Freddy Krueger, and Ghostface, emphasizing that Chucky’s weapon is underestimation. The episode closes by looking at the film’s balance of horror and dark humor, which helps make Chucky feel timeless and still influential in later doll and toy-based horror stories. Timestamps 00:00 - Opening the Halloween marathon with a killer doll 00:57 - Charles Lee Ray and the voodoo soul transfer 01:53 - Why shrinking the slasher formula works 03:29 - Cast, voice performance, and the film’s setup 04:25 - Chucky is a killer, not an innocent toy 05:02 - Andy wants the doll, Karen can’t afford it 05:50 - Karen’s disbelief and the parent perspective 08:55 - The adults keep missing what Andy already knows 09:39 - Chucky reveals himself to Karen 10:54 - The Good Guy doll design and camouflage 11:12 - Brad Dourif and Chucky’s personality 12:07 - How a killer doll can hide anywhere 14:14 - Toy store setting and Chucky blending in 15:33 - Chucky’s goal is to take Andy’s body 19:33 - The slasher icon comparison 20:44 - The investigation becomes a fight for survival 21:05 - Final confrontation and Chucky’s destruction 22:29 - Why the movie still works 24:29 - Adults would never believe a child about this 27:42 - Scream Creeps horror check 28:53 - Favorite scene: the voodoo kill and reveal 30:29 - Favorite character and why Chucky wins 31:55 - Practical effects and the doll’s physical presence 32:49 - Why the movie still holds up 34:05 - Chucky survival rules 35:05 - What would you do if Chucky showed up? 36:45 - Chucky’s weapon is underestimation 38:24 - Final thoughts on Chucky as an icon 39:55 - Closing thoughts and audience call to action Notable quotes “Sometimes all you need is a fucking doll.” “The doll is alive and he’s dangerous.” “Chucky is scary because he’s unexpected.” Action items Rewatch Child’s Play and pay attention to how often the film uses the doll’s stillness as a threat. Notice how much of the tension comes from adults not believing Andy right away. Compare Chucky’s design and personality to other slasher icons and see why he stands apart.
S3 · E6
October 3 · 31 min
The Amityville Horror and the Fear of Home
Jeremy and Josh kick off day three of their 31 Days of Halloween series with a haunted house classic: The Amityville Horror. They cover the film’s atmosphere, the Lutz family’s unsettling experience, and the real-life controversy that made the story famous far beyond the movie itself. It’s a conversation about what makes a house feel haunted, and why the fear works best when the danger feels personal. Key topics Jeremy introduces the haunted house theme and frames the core fear: the place you’re supposed to feel safest becomes the threat. The film setup: The Amityville Horror was released in 1979, directed by Stuart Rosenberg, and stars James Brolin as George Lutz, Margot Kidder as Kathy Lutz, and Rod Steiger as Father Delaney. The house itself is the monster: the isolated property, famous windows, and enormous scale make it feel oppressive even before anything supernatural happens. The real-world backstory matters: the discussion covers the 1974 DeFeo murders, Ronald DeFeo Jr.’s conviction, and the Lutz family’s later claims of paranormal activity. The controversy around the Lutz account: Jeremy and Josh stress that the supernatural claims have been disputed for decades, and that the movie dramatizes a story already wrapped in legend. George’s deterioration is the movie’s strongest horror beat: the house seems to affect him psychologically, raising the question of whether he’s being haunted or becoming dangerous himself. Small details build the dread: strange noises, temperature drops, the red room, the flies, and the recurring 3:15 a.m. timing all add to the slow-burn terror. Father Delaney adds a religious angle: the film leans into the tension between supernatural haunting and psychological breakdown. The ending logic is simple but effective: you can’t defeat the house, you can only leave it. Josh’s perspective is consistent throughout: if a house starts acting wrong, he’s out immediately, no investigation, no priest, no staying to find out. Timestamps 00:00 - Opening banter and Halloween countdown 00:34 - Haunted house theme and The Amityville Horror 01:16 - Real-life claims vs disputed legend 02:22 - Why haunted house stories hit harder than monster movies 02:54 - Film setup, cast, and the Lutz family moving in 03:47 - Why the house image is so iconic and unsettling 04:47 - Josh’s “I’d leave immediately” reaction to hauntings 05:21 - The DeFeo murders and the basis of the story 06:14 - The disputed Lutz account and separating fact from claims 08:25 - George Lutz’s transformation begins 09:41 - Kathy tries to protect the family as George changes 10:10 - Small supernatural incidents build the dread 11:58 - The flies and other classic haunted-house imagery 12:28 - Father Delaney and the religious response 13:23 - Why the priest’s fear matters 16:09 - The house starts feeling alive and oppressive 16:52 - The babysitter setup and audience dread 17:22 - George becomes more unstable and threatening 18:18 - The 3:15 a.m. detail and how it hooks the audience 18:49 - The family pressure escalates as normality fails 19:56 - Why this works as a horror story about sanity breaking down 21:30 - Escaping the house and leaving the dog behind 22:22 - The story becomes bigger than the film 23:18 - The movie as a fictionalized adaptation of a disputed legend 24:31 - Why the haunted-house idea is still effective 25:08 - Scream Creeps horror check: haunted house, creep factor, psychology 26:42 - Josh’s favorite moment: when they leave 27:03 - The wood-chopping detail and its possible meaning 28:01 - Would you stay? Josh says absolutely not 29:07 - Would you call a priest, police, or paranormal investigator? 29:49 - Does the movie still hold up today? 30:34 - Trivia and the shift into “Real or Not” 31:21 - Real events vs disputed supernatural claims 32:12 - Would you live there for a year? Hell no 33:21 - Final thoughts on why the film matters in horror culture 34:51 - Closing question: investigate the noises or get out? Notable quotes “What if the place you're supposed to feel safest is the place that's trying to destroy you?” “If my house starts doing things that houses aren't supposed to do, the house wins, I'm gone.” “Home isn't always where the heart is. Sometimes it's where the horror lives.” Key frameworks Haunted house fear - The enemy isn’t outside the home, it’s already inside. Psychological horror - The house may be supernatural, but the real terror comes from watching George unravel. Fact vs legend - The conversation repeatedly separates documented events from disputed claims and movie dramatization. Action items Notice how the film uses small repeated details, not big jump scares, to create dread. Compare the movie’s version of events with the documented DeFeo murders and the disputed Lutz claims. Watch how the house itself is framed visually as a threat, especially the windows and hallway spaces.
S3 · E5
October 2 · 34 min
The Lost Boys Made Vampires Look Cooler Than Humans
Jeremy and Josh kick off day two of Scream Creeps’ 31 Days of Halloween with an energetic look at The Lost Boys, the 1987 vampire classic set in neon-soaked Santa Carla. They break down why the movie works so well as both horror and teen rebellion fantasy, from the Frog Brothers and Grandpa to Kiefer Sutherland’s charismatic David. In this episode, they focus on how The Lost Boys blends vampire mythology with coming-of-age tension, comedy, and style. They also talk through the film’s standout setting, soundtrack, practical effects, and why it still holds up as one of the defining vampire movies of the 1980s. Key topics Santa Carla is treated like its own character, with the boardwalk, neon, motorcycles, arcade culture, and underground vampire nest creating a perfect horror backdrop. Jeremy and Josh discuss Michael Emerson’s attraction to the Lost Boys and how the movie turns vampirism into something tempting, cool, and dangerous rather than purely monstrous. They break down the contrast between Michael and Sam, with Sam positioned as the skeptical one who recognizes trouble early and Michael drawn toward the local scene. The Frog Brothers get major praise as comic book vampire hunters who bring humor, confidence, and actual competence to the story. David and the Lost Boys are described as looking like an eighties hair metal band, with Kiefer Sutherland singled out for making David both threatening and magnetic. Star, played by Jamie Gertz, is discussed as both a key lure for Michael and a character tied to the vampire world in ways he does not fully understand at first. Max’s reveal as the head vampire is one of the biggest twists in the film, and the conversation highlights how the story builds toward that final confrontation. Grandpa is a clear fan favorite, especially for his eccentric behavior, taxidermy-filled home, and final attitude toward the vampire chaos around him. The episode also covers the film’s mix of horror, adventure, comedy, and coming-of-age themes, which Jeremy and Josh say is a big part of its lasting appeal. The soundtrack and overall eighties atmosphere get special attention, including the saxophone, the style, and songs that instantly bring the movie back to mind. Timestamps 00:00 - Welcome to Santa Carla and day two of Halloween 02:28 - The Lost Boys cast and story setup 03:44 - Why Santa Carla feels like a character 05:24 - Michael and Sam react to the town differently 06:19 - The Frog Brothers enter the story 08:26 - The Lost Boys look like an eighties rock band 09:24 - Why the vampires are so tempting 10:53 - Vampire mythology and Michael’s transformation 13:36 - Michael flies and the movie sells vampirism as cool 16:28 - Star’s role in pulling Michael deeper 17:06 - Max as the hidden vampire threat 17:42 - Grandpa steals every scene 18:27 - The final battle in the Emerson house 19:32 - Max’s death and the vampire threat ends 20:04 - Why the movie works as a personality piece 24:49 - Comparing The Lost Boys to other vampire films 25:46 - Scream Creeps horror check: vampire factor, blood, cool factor 27:25 - Favorite movie moments and standout scenes 29:14 - Favorite character picks 30:22 - The soundtrack and the power of the eighties score 32:04 - Does The Lost Boys still hold up? 33:14 - Joel Schumacher and Batman tangent 34:34 - Peter Pan and the meaning of The Lost Boys title 35:08 - Trivia and production notes 36:12 - Would you notice the vampires in Santa Carla? 37:47 - Wrap-up and tomorrow’s Halloween movie Key themes Vampire temptation over pure monstrosity Coming-of-age story disguised as horror Eighties style as part of the movie’s identity Comedy and horror working together instead of fighting each other Notable quotes “Sometimes moving to a new town means making new friends. Sometimes those friends invite you to a concert. Sometimes they introduce you to the local nightlife, and sometimes they’re a bunch of blood sucking vampires.” “This movie knows exactly what it wanted to be.” “Santa Carla isn’t exactly as safe as a vacation destination.”
S3 · E4
October 1 · 27 min
Psycho: Black and White, Suspense, and the Birth of Modern Horror
Jeremy and Josh kick off Scream Creeps’ 31 Days of Halloween with Alfred Hitchcock’s 1960 classic Psycho. They unpack why the film still works decades later, from its bait-and-switch opening to the infamous shower scene and the final reveal at the Bates Motel.The episode focuses on how Psycho uses suspense, editing, and psychological unease to create lasting horror without relying on graphic gore. Key topics Jeremy introduces Psycho as the first film in the Black and White theme and frames it as a movie that changed horror forever. They warn listeners about major spoilers before discussing Marion Crane’s theft of $40,000 and her arrival at the Bates Motel. Jeremy explains how the film initially makes Marion feel like the main character before shockingly taking the story away from her after the shower scene. Josh discusses watching the film with fresh eyes and realizing how much of his memory came from pop-culture references rather than the full movie. They examine Norman Bates as a polite, awkward, and deeply unsettling character who is never presented as an obvious monster. The motel parlor conversation between Marion and Norman is highlighted as a favorite early scene because of its tension and the mirror-like parallels between the two characters. The shower scene is explored as a masterclass in editing, sound, and suggestion, with the violence mostly implied rather than shown directly. They discuss the practical detail that chocolate syrup was used for the blood effect because of how it appeared on black-and-white film. The cleanup after the murder, the investigation by Lila, Sam, and Arbogast, and the staircase attack all reinforce the film’s eerie, methodical tone. The final reveal is discussed in full: Mrs. Bates is dead, Norman is the killer, and his mother persona has taken over completely. Jeremy and Josh discuss Anthony Perkins’ performance, his later typecasting, the film’s success, and its sequels. The episode closes by arguing that Psycho still holds up because suspense ages better than gore, and the film’s influence can still be seen throughout the slasher genre. Timestamps 00:00 – Launching 31 Days of Halloween with Black and White horror 01:45 – Introducing Psycho and spoiler warning 02:11 – Marion Crane steals $40,000 and goes on the run 03:32 – First look at Norman Bates and the Bates House 04:30 – The motel parlor scene and Norman’s uneasy charm 07:58 – The shower scene and Hitchcock’s editing magic 11:21 – Norman cleans up the murder and hides the evidence 12:07 – Arbogast investigates and meets “Mother” 15:00 – The Bates House reveal and Norman’s fractured identity 16:29 – The ending: Norman in custody and Mother taking control 21:24 – Why suspense still works better than monster reveals 22:16 – Why Psycho is even stronger in black and white 22:44 – Scream Creeps Horror Check: kills, creep factor, and gore 23:36 – Favorite moments and the power of the shower and wig reveal 26:48 – Does Psycho still hold up today? 27:37 – Quick trivia on the novel, editing, and Hitchcock’s secrecy 29:19 – Final thoughts on why Psycho changed horror Notable quotes “Sometimes the most terrifying thing isn't the monster hiding in the darkness, it's the person standing right next to you.” “Psycho proved you don't need excessive gore to make an audience uncomfortable.” “Suspense doesn't really age.” Trivia Psycho was based on Robert Bloch’s 1959 novel of the same name. The shower scene uses rapid editing to imply violence without explicitly showing the knife entering the body. Hitchcock famously worked to preserve the film’s surprises, especially Marion Crane’s fate and Mother’s identity. The Bates Motel and Bates House became two of the most recognizable locations in horror cinema. The film’s influence helped shape the slasher genre through isolated settings, unsuspecting victims, and sudden attacks.
S3 · E3
August 1 · 31 min
The Unhinged Power of Trauma in "Smile 2": Did Outscaring the Original Make It Worse?
Summary Join us as we analyze the horror sequel Smile 2, exploring its themes, scares, and behind-the-scenes trivia. We discuss the film's portrayal of fame, hallucinations, and the impact of Naomi Scott's performance, along with fan theories and future predictions for the franchise. Sound Bites "The scale was just bigger in Smile 2" "Ray Nicholson's smile is a homage to Jack Nicholson" "Naomi Scott did all her songs and choreography" Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Smile 2 and Horror Themes 02:00 Discussion of the franchise's return and October plans 04:29 Fame allegory and the horror of celebrity culture 07:03 Hallucinations and the unreliable narrator in the film 08:50 Ray Nicholson's smile and homage to Jack Nicholson 14:43 Water drinking scene and Naomi Scott's musical talent 22:18 Character names and psychiatric references 23:13 The curse transmission to fans and franchise lore 26:41 Ranking the kills and their impact 28:44 Final thoughts and next movie preview
S3 · E2
Oct 17, 2025 · 30 min
Fright Night (1985) Review: The Ultimate 80s Vampire Cult Classic
Summary In this episode of Scream Creeps, the hosts delve into the cult classic vampire film Fright Night, exploring its unique blend of horror and humor, memorable characters, and lasting impact on the genre. They discuss the film's practical effects, character dynamics, and the cultural significance of its themes, while also sharing behind-the-scenes insights and personal anecdotes related to the movie. The conversation highlights why Fright Night remains a beloved staple in horror cinema, setting the stage for future episodes focused on other iconic horror films. Takeaways Fright Night blends horror with humor and nostalgia. Chris Sarandon's portrayal of Jerry Dandridge is iconic. Roddy McDowall's character is a love letter to horror fans. The practical effects in Fright Night are still impressive today. The film opened doors for future horror comedies. Fright Night's themes include belief and courage. The movie's atmosphere and soundtrack enhance its charm. Evil Ed is a standout character with a memorable arc. The film's legacy influenced many later vampire stories. Fright Night remains a beloved classic for horror enthusiasts. Sound bites "The attention to detail was great." "Vampires are inherently clean." "Evil's alive!" Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Fright Night 01:23 The Characters and Their Dynamics 04:23 Practical Effects and Their Impact 05:34 Cultural Impact and Legacy of Fright Night 11:30 Behind the Scenes and Production Details 18:10 Character Analysis and Performances 24:10 Final Thoughts and Future Episodes
S3 · E1
Oct 11, 2025 · 42 min
Night of the Living Dead (1968) Review: The Film That Raised the Dead
Summary In this episode of Scream Creeps, the hosts delve into George A. Romero's iconic film, Night of the Living Dead. They explore its groundbreaking impact on the horror genre, the making of the film, and its cultural significance. The conversation covers character dynamics, the evolution of zombie tropes, and the film's dark ending. The hosts also discuss the film's legacy, its influence on future horror films, and the production techniques that made it a classic. As part of their 31 days of Halloween marathon, they set the stage for upcoming episodes focused on various horror themes. Takeaways Night of the Living Dead raised the zombie genre from the grave. The film's shocking ending left a lasting impact on audiences. Romero's guerrilla filmmaking techniques were revolutionary for the time. The film's cultural significance is often discussed in the context of race. Ben's character was groundbreaking as a black lead in horror. The film's budget was remarkably low for its success. The evolution of zombie tropes can be traced back to this film. The ending of the film is notably darker than many remakes. The film is preserved in the Library of Congress for its cultural importance. The conversation sets the stage for a month of horror-themed discussions. Sound bites "It was one of a kind back then." "The ending is way more fucked up." "It's in the public domain." Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Night of the Living Dead 02:35 The Making of a Horror Classic 07:30 Cultural Impact and Legacy 12:09 Character Dynamics and Themes 18:52 Music and Production Techniques 22:04 The Evolution of Horror Tropes 23:50 Character Development and Survival Themes 27:12 The Mystery of the Outbreak 30:47 Cultural Significance and Social Commentary 33:56 The Dark Ending and Its Impact 39:39 Comparing Horror Then and Now
S2 · E36
Nov 16, 2024 · 45 min
Terrifier 3 Review: Art the Clown’s Bloodiest Christmas Yet?
In this episode of Scream Creeps, hosts Jeremy and Josh dive deep into the horror film 'Terrifier 3'. They discuss the film's plot, character dynamics, and the return of Art the Clown, exploring the supernatural elements and the film's humor amidst the gore. The hosts also analyze the film's box office success and its impact on the franchise, comparing it to previous installments. With a focus on memorable kill scenes and the campy nature of the film, they conclude with their final thoughts on the evolution of the Terrifier series. In this engaging conversation, Jeremy and Joshua delve into the intricacies of horror films, particularly focusing on the Terrifier franchise and its iconic character, Art the Clown. They explore the evolution of horror movie characters, the blend of humor in horror, and the future of the franchise. The discussion also touches on comparisons with other iconic horror villains and the anticipation of upcoming horror films. Takeaways Terrifier 3 continues the brutal legacy of Art the Clown. The film's budget was $2 million, with significant box office returns. Art the Clown is becoming a recognized horror icon. The supernatural elements add depth to the character dynamics. Humor is interwoven with horror in this installment. Memorable kill scenes are a hallmark of the Terrifier series. The film's campiness sets it apart from its predecessors. Character development is more pronounced in this film. The franchise's success paves the way for future installments. The hosts enjoyed the absurdity and humor in the film. Art the Clown has become a new iconic villain in horror. The blend of humor in horror films can enhance the viewing experience. The Terrifier franchise has evolved significantly with each installment. Future films in the franchise may explore new character dynamics. The character of Sienna may face challenges in future plots. Art the Clown's demon aspect adds depth to his character. The humor in horror can be reminiscent of classic characters like the Joker. The conversation highlights the importance of character development in horror films. Upcoming horror films are highly anticipated by fans. The podcast aims to keep the audience engaged with fresh content. Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Terrifier 3 01:40 Plot Overview and Character Dynamics 03:47 Box Office Success and Franchise Impact 05:59 Art the Clown: A Horror Icon 08:48 Supernatural Elements and Character Development 12:01 Memorable Kill Scenes and Humor 17:04 Comparative Analysis of Terrifier Films 21:12 Conclusion and Final Thoughts 23:00 Exploring Horror Movie Characters 25:57 The Evolution of Art the Clown 28:57 The Future of the Terrifier Franchise 31:58 Humor in Horror: A Unique Blend 35:05 Comparing Iconic Horror Villains 38:59 Upcoming Horror Films and Future Discussions
S2 · E35
Apr 26, 2024 · 32 min
The Babadook (2014) Review: A Masterpiece of Grief or Just Boring?
In this episode, the hosts discuss the film 'The Babadook' and question its placement as the eighth scariest movie of 2020. They explore the themes of parenting, grief, and the fear of madness portrayed in the movie. The hosts express their disappointment with the lack of scares and find the child character annoying. They also discuss the acting performances and the cinematography. Overall, they feel that the movie did not live up to its hype. In this conversation, the hosts discuss the movie 'The Babadook' and share their thoughts on its themes and symbolism. They explore the idea that the Babadook represents the protagonist's battle with depression and grief, and how it manifests in her life. They also touch on the psychological aspects of the film and the need for viewers to think and interpret the movie's meaning. The hosts express their disappointment with the movie, finding it slow and lacking in scares. They announce their plans to review 'A Quiet Place 2' and 'It Follows' in future episodes. Takeaways The Babadook explores the themes of parenting, grief, and the fear of madness. The hosts question the placement of The Babadook as the eighth scariest movie of 2020. They find the child character annoying and the movie lacking in scares. The acting performances and cinematography are praised. The hosts feel that The Babadook did not live up to its hype. The Babadook can be interpreted as a metaphor for the protagonist's battle with depression and grief. The movie explores psychological themes and requires viewers to think and interpret its meaning. The hosts found the movie slow and lacking in scares. Future episodes will feature reviews of 'A Quiet Place 2' and 'It Follows'. Chapters 00:00 Introduction to The Babadook 06:47 The Babadook as a Cult Classic 13:54 Lack of Scares in The Babadook 25:03 Disappointment with the Lack of Scares 29:57 Upcoming Reviews: 'A Quiet Place 2' and 'It Follows'
S2 · E34
Apr 19, 2024 · 42 min
The Descent (2005) Review: Claustrophobic Horror in an Unmapped Cave
In this episode of the Scream Creeps podcast, the hosts discuss the 2005 horror film 'The Descent'. They explore the behind-the-scenes secrets of the movie and the terrifying atmosphere it creates. The conversation also touches on the director, Neil Marshall, and the cast of relatively unknown actors. The hosts share their thoughts on the claustrophobic setting and the intense survival story. They also mention the alternate ending of the film and the controversy surrounding the character Juno. Overall, they consider 'The Descent' to be a standout horror film of the 2000s. The conversation revolves around the movie 'The Descent' and covers various topics such as the initial shock factor, the character development of Sarah, the decision-making of the characters, the realism of the movie, the rankings in the horror genre, and the potential for a sequel. The hosts also discuss the heart rate study related to the movie and share their personal opinions and experiences. They conclude by mentioning their upcoming episodes and content on their channel. Takeaways The Descent is a 2005 horror film that creates a terrifying atmosphere and intense survival story. The director, Neil Marshall, and the cast of relatively unknown actors contribute to the film's success. The claustrophobic setting and the use of sound create a sense of fear and tension. The alternate ending of the film and the controversy surrounding the character Juno add to the discussion. 'The Descent' is considered one of the standout horror films of the 2000s. The opening scene of 'The Descent' sets the tone and shocks the audience, immediately creating empathy for the main character. Sarah's character development throughout the movie, especially after the blood scene, makes her a badass and a compelling protagonist. The decision-making of the characters, particularly Juno, raises questions about morality and survival instincts. The movie is considered more of an action flick than a traditional horror movie, with the darkness and claustrophobic setting adding to the suspense. The heart rate study ranked 'The Descent' as one of the scariest movies, with a high heart rate spike during a shocking scene. The potential for a sequel is explored, with the second movie following the events of the first and focusing on the search for the missing friends. The hosts discuss their upcoming episodes and content on their channel, including music reviews and let's plays. Chapters 00:00 Introduction to 'The Descent' 09:41 The Claustrophobic Setting and Intense Atmosphere 25:24 Sarah's Character Development 32:42 Questioning Morality and Survival Instincts 41:23 The Potential for a Sequel
S2 · E33
Mar 29, 2024 · 34 min
The Visit (2015) Review: M. Night Shyamalan's Creepy Comeback
In this episode, the hosts discuss the movie 'The Visit' directed by M. Night Shyamalan. They provide background information about the film and its reception. The hosts share their initial impressions and talk about Shyamalan's career. They also discuss the funding of the movie and the accurate depiction of insanity. Creepy moments and plot holes are explored, and the hosts analyze the realistic reactions of the characters. They delve into unanswered questions and how the movie would play out in a real-life scenario. The hosts share their favorite moments and critique the unrealistic actions in the film. They conclude by discussing the mixed reviews of the movie. In this conversation, the hosts discuss M. Night Shyamalan's filmography, including his hits and misses. They talk about the mixed reception for films like 'The Last Airbender' and 'After Earth' and the challenges of adapting previous works. The hosts also discuss Mark Wahlberg's acting style and his diverse roles. They mention other films by M. Night Shyamalan and his return to success with movies like 'Split' and 'Old'. The conversation concludes with a discussion on the unique features of 'The Visit' and upcoming movies in the series. Takeaways The Visit is a 2015 horror film directed by M. Night Shyamalan. The movie received positive reviews and was considered a return to form for Shyamalan. The accurate depiction of insanity and creepy moments were highlights of the film. There were some plot holes and unrealistic actions in the movie. Chapters 00:00 Introduction 00:41 Background of the Movie 02:21 Initial Impressions 03:16 M. Night Shyamalan's Career 04:22 Funding the Movie 05:03 Accurate Depiction of Insanity 06:13 Mystery and Reveals 07:14 Creepy Moments 08:28 Plot Holes 09:16 Realistic Reactions 10:26 Parental Precautions 11:12 Unanswered Questions 12:00 Real-Life Scenario 13:06 Favorite Moments 14:42 Unrealistic Actions 15:33 Mixed Reviews 17:07 Mixed Reception for 'The Last Airbender' and 'After Earth' 18:00 Adapting Previous Works 18:38 Mark Wahlberg's Acting Style 19:56 Mark Wahlberg's Diverse Roles 20:24 Other Films by M. Night Shyamalan 22:23 M. Night Shyamalan's Return to Success 25:41 Unique Features of 'The Visit' 26:57 Olivia DeJonge's Role in 'The Visit' 28:01 Inconsistencies in Heart Rate Results 30:17 Upcoming Movies in the Series

Showing 1–20 of 22 episodes