Skip to content
Sign in
Artwork for Psychiatry Boot Camp
Health & FitnessMedicineEducationCoursesBusinessCareers

Psychiatry Boot Camp

Mark Mullen, MD

Your clear, practical introduction to the field of psychiatry.  Each episode features a leading expert unpacking complex topics like suicide risk, schizophrenia, catatonia, and childhood anxiety. Originally created as a crash course for new doctors, Psychiatry Boot Camp has grown into essential listening for professionals preparing for residency, advancing their careers, or sharpening their clinical decision-making.

Hosted by psychiatrist and educator Dr. Mark Mullen, the program delivers expert insight and practical teaching opportunities. Thanks to the participation of our incredible audience, the PBC team is proud to provide a trusted resource for students, clinicians, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of psychiatry in practice.

To Learn More Visit www.psychiatrybootcamp.com

Got a Question? Email mark@psychiatrybootcamp.com

Play
Open in
  • 21 episodes
  • fortnightly
  • Avg 59 min
  • English

Episodes 21

NewestOldestLongest
All20Unplayed20In progress0Played0
Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.
  • Monday · 57 min

    NAMI to FNIH: Grand Rounds on Mental Health Innovation w/ Dr. Christine Crawford & Steve Hoffmann

    Dr. Mark Mullen welcomes Dr. Christine Crawford, Chief Medical Officer at the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) and author of You Are Not Alone: For Parents and Caregivers, alongside Steve Hoffmann, Senior Vice President and Chief Preclinical Officer at the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH). Dr. Crawford discusses NAMI's mission and its 650 chapters nationwide, the concept of the "distress radius" as a framework for identifying when a child's behavioral changes warrant professional evaluation, and practical strategies for engaging skeptical patients and families through primary care. She also highlights dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) as a broadly applicable clinical tool and underscores the importance of evidence-based education for patients and caregivers navigating the mental health system. The conversation then shifts to Steve Hoffmann's work at the FNIH, including the newly launching Multimodal Assessment and Phenotyping in Depression (MAPD) study, a longitudinal, multi-site initiative designed to identify biological, clinical, and digital biomarkers associated with depression subtypes. Hoffmann outlines the study's design, including neuroimaging, genetic testing, digital wearables, and patient-reported outcomes, with the goal of moving depression treatment away from a trial-and-error model toward a precision medicine approach. Dr. Crawford and Hoffmann both emphasize the importance of including patient voices in research design, drawing parallels to the foundational impact of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) on that field. Takeaways: The "distress radius" framework encourages parents to evaluate whether a child's behavioral changes extend beyond the home into school, social, and extracurricular settings as a signal for further evaluation. NAMI operates 650 chapters nationwide and offers peer-led support groups and educational workshops that clinicians can use as a clinical resource for patients and families. Dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) skills, including emotional regulation and mindfulness techniques, have broad applicability beyond borderline personality disorder and may benefit general populations. The MAPD study aims to identify multimodal biomarkers, including neuroimaging, genetic, sleep, and digital data, to enable more precise, individualized depression treatment selection. Engaging primary care providers early in the mental health conversation can reduce reliance on long specialist wait lists and help identify safety concerns sooner. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Chapters: 00:00 Meet the Guests 00:58 What NAMI Does 02:31 Why NAMI Matters 04:24 Why Write You Are Not Alone 05:38 Building a Parent Roadmap 09:08 Distress Radius Warning Signs 12:46 NAMI as a Clinical Resource 18:37 Skeptical Patients and Primary Care 23:29 DBT Skills Everyone Needs 26:56 Sponsor Break 29:26 What Is the FNIH 33:32 MAPD Mapping Depression 46:40 Hopes and Takeaways Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • August 10 · 50 min

    Inside Pediatric Emergency Psychiatry with Dr. Megan Schott

    Dr. Mark Mullen welcomes Dr. Megan Schott, a child and adolescent psychiatrist specializing in pediatric emergency psychiatry, for a discussion on the escalating boarding crisis affecting youth in psychiatric emergencies. Dr. Schott, who has built pediatric emergency psychiatry programs from the ground up across multiple academic health systems, details how the presence of a trained child psychiatrist in the emergency department can reduce unnecessary admissions by more than half. The conversation examines the definition of boarding, the systemic and financial pressures that limit psychiatric bed availability for children, and the often-overlooked risks of inpatient hospitalization, including social, academic, and long-term consequences for young patients. The episode also features a supervision-style case discussion on managing a challenging conduct disorder presentation, along with a series of rapid-fire "hot takes" covering healthcare parity legislation, the risks social media platforms pose to adolescent safety, and practical guidance for emergency staff without access to a child psychiatrist. Takeaways: Having a trained child and adolescent psychiatrist in the pediatric ED can drastically reduce psychiatric admission rates Boarding is technically defined as remaining in the ED or on a medical floor for eight or more hours after a disposition decision has been made. Inpatient psychiatric admission carries real risks for children, including social stigma, academic disruption, and potential long-term consequences. Mobile crisis teams and psychiatric urgent care models offer promising alternatives to traditional ED-based psychiatric evaluation for lower-acuity cases. Clinicians should openly acknowledge systemic limitations to patients and families rather than overpromising solutions that the current system cannot deliver. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Connect with Human Content on Socials: @humancontentpodsProduced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content⁠ Chapters 00:00 Meet Dr Megan Schott 01:44 Why CAPs in the ED 03:23 What Boarding Means 04:31 Why Beds Are Scarce 07:23 When Not to Admit 13:59 System Fixes and Crisis Teams 17:28 Tough Case Supervision 23:34 Cut Admin Burden 24:47 Medlines Podcast Plug 26:02 CPS Boarding Clash 32:33 Advocacy Beyond Psychiatry 34:02 Parity Law Hot Take 36:01 Social Media Dangers 38:31 ER Tips And Wrap Up Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • July 27 · 1 hr 16 min

    A Practical Guide to the Psychiatry Match with Dr. Lia Thomas

    In this Season 5 premiere of Psychiatry Boot Camp, Dr. Mark Mullen welcomes Dr. Lia Thomas, Associate Program Director at UT Southwestern, co-lead psychiatry specialty advisor for medical students at UTSW, and co-chair of the Psychiatry Residency Application Advisor Group for ADMSEP , for a comprehensive, practical review of the psychiatry residency match process. Speaking from both the program director's and specialty advisor's perspectives, Dr. Thomas addresses the questions medical students and their advisors most frequently encounter: how many programs to apply to, how to strategically deploy the 10 available program signals, what program directors actually weigh when screening applications, and what can silently sink a candidacy even after a strong application earns an interview. The conversation proceeds systematically through each major component of the ERAS application, including clerkship grades, board scores, the personal statement, meaningful experiences, research, away rotations, letters of recommendation, and academic "red flags," before turning to interview strategy for the virtual recruitment environment, post-interview communication, letters of intent, and the distinct considerations for couples matching, DO students, and international medical graduates. Throughout, Dr. Thomas emphasizes that the match is a job application process governed by holistic review, and that the highest-yield investment an applicant can make is to know their application, know their competitiveness, and work closely with an advisor who can help them tell a coherent narrative about who they are. Takeaways: Psychiatry is meaningfully more competitive than a decade ago but remains well below the most competitive specialties like dermatology; applicants should consider targeting around 50 program applications, with 30–40 being appropriate for most students, as exceeding 50 produces diminishing returns on interview yield relative to cost. Program signals should be deployed strategically rather than on prestige alone. Stacking geographic preference with program signals communicates a compellingly specific intent to train in a region, while burning signals on top-ranked programs the applicant is unlikely to competitively match at represents poor return on investment. When screening ERAS applications for interview invitations, most program directors weigh clerkship grades and meaningful experiences above board scores, and letters of recommendation are nearly last, as they are largely homogeneous documents that speak more to the letter writer than the applicant. Academic and professional leaves or red flags must be addressed head-on in the application with a clear account of what happened, what was learned, and how the applicant will be a better physician because of it. Defensiveness or excessive detail are both contraindicated, and applicants should review this language with a trusted advisor or dean before submitting. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • June 29 · 1 hr 12 min

    Psychiatry's Most Controversial Topics: Dr. Mark Mullen's Season 4 Retrospective with Dr. Preston Roche

    In this season finale of Psychiatry Bootcamp, Dr. Mark Mullen assumes the role of guest as he is interviewed by guest host Dr. Preston Roche, co-host of How to Be a Patient, in a wide-ranging retrospective on Season 4. Drawing on listener questions, critical feedback, and audience-submitted comments curated from Spotify, TikTok, Instagram, and email, the episode revisits the season's most clinically significant and intellectually provocative conversations, including sports psychiatry, meaningful psychotherapy, problematic screen use, decisional capacity, DSM reform, TMS, physician-assisted suicide, complex PTSD, mental illness in the carceral system, involuntary treatment, and the role of artificial intelligence in the future of the field. Takeaways: The most important goal of psychotherapy is not symptom reduction but meaningful psychological change, the kind that reshapes a patient's self-understanding and relational patterns, a distinction that is largely absent from psychiatric residency training and deserves far greater clinical emphasis. Psychiatric diagnoses have clear on-ramps but almost no off-ramps; clinicians should communicate to patients that meeting criteria for a disorder at one point in time does not mean they will require lifelong treatment, and should revisit diagnostic labels rather than carrying them forward indefinitely. When conducting a decisional capacity assessment in a consultation-liaison setting, identifying all stakeholders and clarifying what the requesting team would actually do with the result often renders a formal capacity determination unnecessary and prevents unnecessary clinical and ethical conflict. Delivering a personality disorder diagnosis in a brief inpatient or consultation encounter risks doing more harm than good; offering psychoeducation about personality organization and a referral to evidence-based psychotherapy, such as dialectical behavior therapy, may better serve the patient without prematurely affixing a label. The Tarasoff doctrine, by requiring psychiatrists to disclose patient communications under specific threat conditions, may inadvertently suppress the very disclosures that would enable early intervention, particularly in patients at risk for suicide who avoid honesty with their treaters precisely because they fear the legal consequences of that honesty. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • June 15 · 1 hr 15 min

    Inside Sports Psychiatry with Dr. David McDuff

    In this episode of Psychiatry Bootcamp, Dr. Mark Mullen welcomes Dr. David McDuff, the "grandfather" of sports psychiatry, to examine the origins, clinical framework, and practical application of this rapidly evolving subspecialty. Dr. McDuff brings more than three decades of experience as team psychiatrist for the Baltimore Orioles and Baltimore Ravens, alongside service on the International Olympic Committee's Mental Health Working Group, to offer a uniquely authoritative perspective on mental health care in elite sport. Takeaways: The sports psychiatrist functions as an embedded, on-site clinician whose brief, informal interactions in training rooms and on practice fields carry genuine therapeutic weight, producing athlete utilization rates of 25–35%, five to seven times the standard employee assistance program benchmark. Dr. McDuff treats the athlete's brain as neurobiologically sensitive, initiating all psychiatric medications at or below the lowest standard doses and preferring slow-titration combination pharmacotherapy over high-dose monotherapy to maximize adherence and harness placebo effect. Common therapeutic factors like engaging a support system can be especially effective in athletes and especially difficult to initiate due to stimga. Therapeutic use exemptions do not require a prior trial of non-stimulant agents, stimulants remain guideline-concordant first-line treatment for ADHD in athletes, and withholding them without clinical justification constitutes a lower standard of care. Clinicians seeking formal training in sports psychiatry can pursue a 27-module certificate through the International Society of Sports Psychiatry (https://sportspsychiatry.org/) or board certification through the American Board of Sport and Performance Psychiatry, which now offers three distinct pathways for medical students, residents, and experienced clinicians. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • June 1 · 1 hr 7 min

    Meaningful Psychotherapy: Psychoanalytic Principles in Modern Psychotherapy with Dr. Jonathan Shedler

    In this profound episode of Psychiatry Boot Camp, host Dr. Mark Mullen sits down with world-renowned researcher and clinician Dr. Jonathan Shedler. Moving beyond the "alphabet soup" of modern modalities, Dr. Shedler argues for a return to the foundational psychoanalytic principles that constitute the "trunk and roots" of all effective talk therapy. The discussion challenges the standard medical model of "diagnose and prescribe," urging psychiatrists to unlearn passive history-taking in favor of a collaborative partnership that traverses into the unknown. From critiquing the superficiality of "therapy speak" and the "first aid" nature of short-term institutional treatments to highlighting the vital roles of personal therapy and high-quality supervision, Dr. Shedler offers a rigorous roadmap for practitioners seeking to restore the soul of psychiatry. Takeaways: Traversing the Unknown: Real psychological change requires both patient and therapist to abandon familiar, repetitive patterns and enter an unscripted, shared space of discovery. Partnership vs. Procedure: Meaningful therapy is a collaborative partnership where the clinician is not an all-knowing expert performing a procedure on a passive patient, but a participant-observer figuring out the problem together. Aptitude and Experience: Developing clinical expertise requires three pillars: inherent aptitude for the work, the clinician’s own personal psychotherapy, and high-quality, non-administrative clinical supervision. The "Fever" Metaphor: Symptoms like depression and anxiety are non-specific responses to underlying difficulties; meaningful treatment identifies the cause of the "fever" rather than just providing symptom-suppressing "aspirin". The Danger of Therapy Speak: Popular cliches like "your feelings are valid" or "toxic narcissist" often act as intellectual defenses that bypass the hard work of understanding specific, particular experiences. Dose and Duration: Research suggests that meaningful, life-shifting psychological change typically begins around six months of weekly treatment, contrasting sharply with the 12-session models common in institutional settings. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: Head to cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 30% off — but only for a limited time. This exclusive offer runs from May 18th through June 1st only, so don't wait. Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • May 25 · 1 min

    BONUS: Call for Submissions: Shaping the Season Four Final Forum

    In this brief bonus segment of Psychiatry Boot Camp, host Dr. Mark Mullen steps into the feed with a direct request from you...the listenters. As Season Four approaches its conclusion, the platform is shifting its final episode to a peer-responsive format driven entirely by listener inputs. Dr. Mullen notes that the season has featured highly controversial topics and that he frequently abandoned an unbiased stance to take explicit clinical positions. Psychiatrists, residents, and mental health professionals are invited to submit their critiques, follow-up questions on any covered material, or general psychiatry queries to be read and answered on the air. Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • May 18 · 1 hr 3 min

    Identifying and Addressing Problematic Screen Use with Dr. Justin Romano

    In this episode of Psychiatry Boot Camp, host Dr. Mark Mullen is joined by Dr. Justin Romano, a child and adolescent psychiatrist and host of the Millennial Mental Health Channel. Dr. Romano explores the burgeoning crisis of screen dependence and technology addiction, drawing parallels between cell phone use and traditional substance use disorders. The discussion highlights how addictive design, powered by algorithms and AI, hijacks the dopamine reward pathways in children’s plastic, developing brains. Dr. Romano provides a sobering look at societal consequences, from the rise of "technology a-motivation syndrome" and extreme emotional dysregulation in schools to the isolation of the "loneliest generation". Moving beyond diagnosis, the episode offers concrete family strategies, such as the "DJ Khaled approach", and a call for robust public health policies to hold tech companies accountable for the digital wellbeing of the next generation. Takeaways: Addiction by Design: Smartphones and social media apps are psychologically engineered to be as addictive as possible, utilizing dopamine hits to create dependency similar to gambling. Vulnerability of Developing Brains: Children are at higher risk because their frontal lobes are not fully developed, making it harder to resist the allure of screens and predisposing them to lifelong addiction patterns. Loneliness and Sedentary Trends: Despite being "connected," Gen Z is the loneliest generation in history, often substituting deep, in-person relationships with superficial online interactions that lead to isolation and physical inactivity. Technology A-Motivation Syndrome: Excessive screen time (often 8+ hours daily) can lead to a lack of drive for real-world hobbies, interests, or social engagement. The "DJ Khaled" Clinical Strategy: Clinicians can ally with patients by framing tech companies, not parents, as the "they" that "doesn't want you to win," helping to reduce power struggles and promote self-regulation. Parental Role Modeling: A major modulator of a child's emotional regulation is their parents' own screen use; even 45 minutes of daily screen-free family time can improve outcomes. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Head to cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 30% off — but only for a limited time. This exclusive offer runs from May 18th through June 1st only, so don't wait. Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • May 4 · 1 hr 11 min

    Decisional Capacity: Rethinking the Standard of Care with Dr. Omar Mirza

    In this provocative episode of Psychiatry Boot Camp, Dr. Omar Mirza discusses the limitations and potential harms of the standard Applebaum-Grisso criteria for decisional capacity. Dr. Mirza argues that the current medicalized focus on cognitive abilities (understanding, appreciation, reasoning) can inadvertently subvert patient autonomy. The conversation traces the legal evolution of informed consent, from Schloendorff to the Nuremberg Code, and introduces radical alternative frameworks: Dr. Jacob Appell’s Values-Based Assessment and Dr. Mirza’s own "FREE WILL" model. This episode challenges clinicians to view the capacity assessment not as a benign measurement, but as a potent intervention with significant risks, advocating for a humble, approach that prioritizes the "dignity of risk" over institutional paternalism. Takeaways: Shift from Assessment to Intervention: Capacity evaluations should be reconceptualized as "challenges" or "interventions" rather than benign measurements, acknowledging their potential to damage the therapeutic alliance and cause iatrogenic harm. Values Over Cognition: The traditional cognitive model fails to account for a patient’s personal values; a Values-Based Assessment investigates discordance between a choice and a patient's longitudinal values rather than just their ability to justify the choice. The "Respectable Minority" Rule: Medicolegally, physicians may meet the standard of care by following a "respectable minority" opinion, allowing for the use of emerging, viable alternative models to the dominant Applebaum standards. Addressing Power Asymmetry: Capacity assessments often function as a "colonial act" or a "flex of power" that only exists within hospital boundaries, disproportionately impacting those with lower socioeconomic status or different cultural perspectives. The "FREE WILL" Framework: A mnemonic for clinicians to navigate the legal (Foundation, Reason, Everyone, Expectation) and clinical (Want, Investigation, Listen, Logical solution) levers of capacity. Dignity of Risk: Respecting autonomy means allowing for "unwise" or risky decisions that are consistent with a patient's identity. REFERENCES: The CL Psychiatrist: Decisional Capacity: Autonomy vs. Beneficence (Graphic Novel by Dr. Mirza): https://www.amazon.com/CL-Psychiatrist-Decisional-Capacity-Beneficence/dp/0990827763 Zürcher T, Elger B, Trachsel M. “The Notion of Free Will and Its Ethical Relevance for Decision-Making Capacity.”: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31068168/ Mirza OF, Appel JM. “Capacity Reconceptualized: From Assessment Tool to Clinical Intervention.”: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36825923/ Appelbaum PS. “Assessment of Patients’ Competence to Consent to Treatment.” PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17978292/ Perske R. “The Dignity of Risk and the Mentally Retarded.”: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5059995/ SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • April 20 · 1 hr 6 min

    Six Critical Suggestions for DSM-6 with Dr. Awais Aftab

    In this second part of a special double feature, Dr. Awais Aftab, MD, Clinical Associate Professor at Case Western Reserve University, presents a rigorous framework for the next iteration of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Dr. Aftab details six specific structural reforms for the DSM-6, beginning with a conceptual clarification of "mental disorder" to distinguish between biological dysfunction and socio-cultural atypicality. The discussion challenges the arbitrary nature of current diagnostic thresholds and the "equalizing" effect of the manual that obscures the empirical weight of different conditions. Dr. Aftab advocates for the inclusion of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) as an alternative dimensional model and calls for radical transparency regarding pharmaceutical industry ties within the APA task forces. This episode serves as a high-level roadmap for clinicians and researchers seeking a more scientifically valid and clinically honest diagnostic system. Takeaways: Conceptual Precision: The DSM must explicitly define "dysfunction" to prevent muddled debates about whether psychiatry is medicalizing normal suffering or identifying biological breakdowns. Empirical Indexing: All diagnoses should be accompanied by an indicator of their empirical validation to avoid treating disparate conditions, like schizophrenia and intermittent explosive disorder, as having equal scientific standing. Threshold Rationalization: Diagnostic cutoffs (e.g., 5 out of 9 symptoms) should be optimized based on data regarding treatment response and functional outcomes rather than historical "vibes" or consensus. Dimensional Integration: Including HiTOP in the DSM appendix would recognize robust statistical evidence that mental health problems exist on spectra (e.g., internalizing, externalizing) rather than as discrete categorical "packets". Closing Schema Gaps: The manual should shift toward dimensional descriptions to accommodate the high volume of "unspecified" patients who fall through the "holes" of current categorical schemas. Public Accountability: To maintain professional legitimacy, the APA should remove paywalls for diagnostic criteria and provide full public transparency regarding industry associations among task force members. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Beat the Boards⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • April 6 · 46 min

    Scientific Pluralism and the Evolution of Psychiatric Classification with Dr. Awais Aftab

    In this episode of Psychiatry Boot Camp, host Dr. Mark Mullen sits down with Dr. Awais Aftab, MD, a psychiatrist and Clinical Associate Professor at Case Western Reserve University. Dr. Aftab, well-known for his "Psychiatry at the Margins" Substack and "Conversations in Critical Psychiatry" series, explores the necessity of "conceptual competence" in modern practice. The discussion delves into the "Psychiatric Psychodrama," analyzing how material inequalities fuel polarized culture wars between "repenting" and "repressing" psychiatric factions. Dr. Aftab further defines scientific pluralism, challenging the 20th-century hope for a unified, reductive biological model of mental illness. Finally, the conversation examines the "Rumpelstiltskin Effect", the therapeutic impact of the diagnostic ritual, while cautioning against the iatrogenic risks of internalized stigma and essentialist misunderstandings. Takeaways: Conceptual Competence: Clinicians must understand the underlying philosophical assumptions and vocabulary inherent in psychiatric research and diagnosis to avoid muddled practice. Psychiatric Psychodrama: Much of the field’s internal conflict is driven by material inequalities and resource scarcity, often manifesting as a "culture war" between those who pathologically condemn the field and those who minimize its failures. Scientific Pluralism: Psychiatry lacks a single, unitary scientific method; instead, it relies on a "dappled" worldview where biological, psychological, and social explanations function at different, non-reducible levels.The Rumpelstiltskin Effect: Receiving a formal diagnosis can provide immense relief by shifting a patient’s narrative from one of moral blame to a technical, medical framework. Essentialist Risks: Over-identifying with a diagnosis as a fixed, unchangeable "essence" can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies of impairment and avoidance, highlighting the need for nuanced patient communication. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Beat the Boards⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • March 23 · 1 hr 21 min

    TMS for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Clinical Guide with Dr. Owen Muir

    In this episode of Psychiatry Boot Camp, Dr. Mark Mullen speaks with Dr. Owen Muir, psychiatrist, entrepreneur, and Chief Medical Officer of Radial Health, about the growing role of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in psychiatric treatment. The discussion explores how TMS works as a form of noninvasive neuromodulation, using focused magnetic fields to influence neural circuits implicated in depression and other psychiatric conditions. Dr. Muir reviews the evidence supporting TMS for treatment-resistant depression, explains the FDA clearance pathway for neuromodulation devices, and discusses how stimulation parameters, coil positioning, and treatment protocols affect clinical outcomes. The conversation also addresses the broader implications of neuromodulation in psychiatry, including emerging indications, technological innovation, and how clinicians can integrate TMS into modern psychiatric practice. This episode provides a practical and conceptual overview of one of the fastest-growing treatment modalities in mental health care. Takeaways: TMS is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that uses magnetic fields to induce electrical activity in targeted cortical regions. The primary FDA-cleared indication is treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, though research continues for other conditions including OCD and PTSD. Treatment protocols depend on stimulation parameters, including frequency, location (often the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), and session scheduling. The FDA device clearance process differs from pharmaceutical approval, relying heavily on device equivalence and clinical safety data. Neuromodulation represents a growing frontier in psychiatry, complementing pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in the treatment of complex mood disorders. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Beat the Boards⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • March 9 · 1 hr 13 min

    Physician Assisted Suicide: Clinical, Legal, and Ethical Implications for Psychiatry with Dr. Mark Komrad

    In this episode of Psychiatry Boot Camp, Dr. Mark Mullen speaks with psychiatrist and medical ethicist Dr. Mark Komrad about physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia, focusing particularly on their implications for psychiatric practice. The discussion reviews the terminology, legal frameworks, and international trends surrounding assisted death, including developments in Belgium, the Netherlands, Canada, and multiple U.S. states. Dr. Komrad outlines concerns regarding capacity assessments, the expansion from terminal illness to psychiatric suffering, and the ethical tensions between autonomy and the physician’s role as healer. The episode also examines countertransference, projective identification, and the clinical dynamics that arise when treating chronically suicidal patients in jurisdictions where assisted death is permitted. Position statements from the American Medical Association and the American Psychiatric Association are reviewed, along with questions of conscientious objection Takeaways: Terminology matters. Major professional organizations continue to prefer the term “physician-assisted suicide,” reflecting ongoing ethical debate about whether these practices are distinct from suicide prevention work. Capacity assessment standards remain variable. In many jurisdictions, evaluations are left largely to physician (or provider) discretion without standardized psychiatric frameworks. Expansion beyond terminal illness is occurring internationally. Countries that initially limited eligibility to end-of-life conditions have broadened criteria to include chronic disability and, in some regions, primary psychiatric diagnoses. Borderline personality disorder and mood disorders are disproportionately represented in psychiatric assisted death cases in some European jurisdictions. Countertransference and projective identification are clinically relevant. Physicians must remain vigilant about how therapeutic fatigue and induced hopelessness can influence decision-making in chronically suicidal patients. Key professional organizations in the United States maintain opposition to physician assisted suicide. The AMA and APA have articulated clear ethical boundaries regarding the role of physicians and psychiatrists in assisted death. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Beat the Boards⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • February 23 · 1 hr 3 min

    Complex PTSD, Borderline Personality Disorder, and Diagnostic Validity with Dr. Mark L. Ruffalo

    In this episode of Psychiatry Bootcamp, Dr. Mark Mullen is joined by Dr. Mark Ruffalo for an in-depth examination of complex post-traumatic stress disorder (C-PTSD), a construct widely discussed in academic and public discourse, but not currently recognized as a distinct DSM diagnosis. The conversation situates C-PTSD within the historical and theoretical landscape of psychiatry, tracing its origins to Judith Herman’s work and examining its proposed relationship to borderline personality disorder and classical PTSD. Dr. Ruffalo explores core questions of diagnostic validity versus reliability, drawing on foundational psychiatric theory, communication models such as the double bind, and contemporary critiques of the DSM’s proliferation of categories. Listeners will gain a framework for understanding why diagnostic labels matter, how trauma-informed care can coexist with diagnostic rigor, and the potential clinical consequences of adopting constructs without clear discriminant validity. The episode emphasizes careful formulation, treatment matching, and ethical responsibility in an era of expanding diagnostic language. Takeaways: Complex PTSD lacks consensus diagnostic criteria, raising concerns about discriminant validity when compared with borderline personality disorder and PTSD. Diagnostic reliability is not the same as validity, a central limitation of DSM-based classification systems. Borderline personality disorder encompasses heterogeneous pathways, including, but not limited to, trauma exposure. Mislabeling can lead to mismatched treatment, particularly when trauma-focused approaches obscure underlying personality pathology. Thoughtful diagnosis strengthens, rather than harms, therapeutic alliance when delivered with empathy, dimensional framing, and attention to prognosis. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Beat the Boards⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • February 9 · 1 hr 6 min

    Severe Mental Illness Behind Bars: A Breakdown in Care with Jesse Bogan

    In this episode of Psychiatry Bootcamp, Dr. Mark Mullen speaks with Jesse Bogan, journalist with The Marshall Project, about a profound and often invisible failure at the intersection of psychiatry and the criminal legal system: the prolonged incarceration of individuals found incompetent to stand trial without access to timely psychiatric treatment. Using Missouri as a case study, the conversation traces how defendants with severe mental illness can spend months to years in jail awaiting competency evaluations and restoration, despite legal mandates requiring prompt assessment and care. Jesse shares detailed reporting on systemic delays, limited forensic bed capacity, underfunded community mental health services, and pilot programs that have failed to meet the clinical needs of profoundly ill patients. The episode examines ethical and constitutional implications, including potential violations of the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial, and highlights the human cost of untreated psychosis, mania, and depression in carceral settings. This discussion challenges clinicians to confront how structural failures transform jails into default psychiatric holding facilities and asks what role psychiatry must play in reform. Takeaways: Incompetency to stand trial creates legal limbo. Defendants may be jailed for years while their criminal cases are paused, awaiting psychiatric treatment that is legally required but operationally unavailable. Jails are not treatment settings. Severe mental illness often worsens during prolonged incarceration, reducing the likelihood of competency restoration and increasing morbidity and mortality. Systemic underfunding drives criminalization. Gaps in outpatient care, involuntary treatment mechanisms, and forensic infrastructure funnel untreated patients into the justice system. Competency restoration programs have limits. Jail-based and mobile models often fail for patients who are too psychotic or disorganized to engage meaningfully in treatment. This is a national problem. While Missouri is highlighted, similar backlogs and constitutional concerns exist across the United States and internationally. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Beat the Boards⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • January 26 · 1 hr 1 min

    Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment in Modern Psychiatry with Dr. Dinah Miller

    In this episode of Psychiatry Bootcamp, Dr. Mark Mullen is joined by Dr. Dinah Miller, psychiatrist, writer, and author of Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care, for a rigorous examination of civil commitment and involuntary treatment in modern psychiatry. The conversation explores the legal structures underlying involuntary hospitalization, medication over objection, and outpatient civil commitment, while highlighting the profound ethical tensions between patient autonomy, public safety, and clinical responsibility. Dr. Miller traces the historical evolution of involuntary care, examines why state systems vary so widely, and explains why outcomes data remain limited and difficult to interpret. Listeners will gain a framework for understanding the competing advocacy groups shaping policy, the real-world consequences of emergency department boarding and bed shortages, and the psychological impact involuntary care can have on patients long after discharge. The episode also addresses language, stigma, and how psychiatrists can practice humane, ethically grounded care even when coercion is unavoidable. This is a sober, thoughtful discussion of one of psychiatry’s most challenging responsibilities. Takeaways: Civil commitment is distinct from forensic commitment, yet often conflated in public discourse and policy discussions. Evidence linking involuntary treatment to improved public safety is limited, in part due to ethical and methodological constraints on research. System failures (bed shortages, ED boarding, lack of housing) amplify the harms of coercive care, even when clinically justified. Outpatient commitment models vary widely, with New York’s AOT program offering one of the most studied but resource-intensive approaches. How psychiatrists communicate, document, and set boundaries during involuntary care profoundly affects patient trust and future engagement. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Beat the Boards⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content⁠⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • January 12 · 47 min

    Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Psychiatry with Dr. Allen Frances

    Psychiatry stands at the threshold of one of its greatest disruptions, the rise of artificial intelligence. In this episode, Dr. Mark Mullen speaks with Dr. Allen Frances, Professor Emeritus and former Chair of Psychiatry at Duke University and Chair of the DSM-IV Task Force, about the clinical, ethical, and societal implications of AI’s rapid entry into mental health care. Drawing from his recent paper in the British Journal of Psychiatry (August 2025), Dr. Frances explores how psychotherapy chatbots have already become the world’s most widely used form of therapy, often beneficial for mild distress but profoundly dangerous for severe mental illness. The discussion examines where chatbots outperform human therapists, where they fail catastrophically, and how clinicians can adapt their practices in anticipation of hybrid human-AI models. Dr. Frances also warns of broader threats, privacy loss, manipulation, and the potential use of AI for political or psychological control This conversation challenges clinicians to approach AI with both curiosity and caution, recognizing its utility while defending the irreplaceable humanity of psychiatric care. Takeaways: AI in psychiatry is no longer hypothetical. Over one billion people now engage with chatbots for therapy or companionship, exceeding all human clinicians combined. Clinical utility is bifurcated. AI can enhance care for mild distress but poses major risks for psychosis, suicidality, and eating disorders. Validation over truth. Chatbots are programmed to please users, not challenge delusions, amplifying psychosis, mania, and self-harm behaviors. Privacy and ethics lag behind innovation. Conversations with chatbots may not be confidential, raising serious HIPAA and legal concerns. Hybrid models are inevitable. Future psychiatrists must integrate AI tools safely, focus on severely ill populations, and preserve the relational aspects machines can’t replicate. References: AI Chatbots: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (Frances' column in Psychiatric Times): https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/series/ai-chatbots-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly Warning: AI Chatbots will soon dominate psychotherapy (Frances' feature in the British Journal of Psychiatry): https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/DBE883D1E089006DFD07D0E09A2D1FB3/S0007125025103802a.pdf/warning_ai_chatbots_will_soon_dominate_psychotherapy.pdf SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SimplePractice.com/bootcamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Beat the Boards⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Go to Cozy Earth now for a Buy One Get One Free Pajama Offer from 1/25-2/8! Yes, go to cozyearth.com they are doing a BOGO pajama promo. Just use my Code: BOOTCAMPBOGO Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:⁠⁠⁠⁠Sales@Human-Content.Com⁠⁠⁠⁠ Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: ⁠⁠⁠⁠Human Content⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Dec 29, 2025 · 1 min

    Beyond Boot Camp: Conversations on Psychiatry's Future (Season 4 Trailer)

    Welcome to Season 4! Join Dr. Mark Mullen and expert guests as we explore AI in psychotherapy, emerging treatments, and the ethical, clinical questions reshaping psychiatric care, and MUCH more. To share topic ideas, ask questions, and get more of the pod, visit psychiatrybootcamp.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • Aug 4, 2025 · 1 hr 23 min

    Malingering and Factitious Disorder: An Approach to Clinical Deception with Dr. Nicholas Kontos

    <p>Dr. Nicholas Kontos, Director of the Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Fellowship at Massachusetts General Hospital and assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, joins us for a reflective conversation on factitious disorder, malingering, and clinical deception. </p><p>We begin by unpacking the concept of “thinking dirty”—a term used in consultation-liaison psychiatry to describe the delicate and often uncomfortable task of considering deception in clinical care. Dr. Kontos wa

  • S3 · E13
    Jul 28, 2025 · 53 min

    Functional Neurological Disorders: Modern Diagnosis & Evidence-Based Management | Dr. Caitlin Adams

    <p>Dr. Caitlin Adams, psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital, provides an overview of functional neurological disorder (FND). This episode covers how to recognize, explain, and treat FND using a modern, evidence-based, and patient-centered approach. </p><p>We begin by defining FND and discussing nomenclature from hysteria through conversion disorder and into our current construct of FND. Dr. Adams directly addresses one of the most critical misconceptions in clinical practice: whether sy

Showing 1–20 of 21 episodes