

FedGeoDay 2025 | Panel - Demystifying AI
This panel, moderated by Bill Doins, features experts Emily Cala, Jason Gilman, Ron Goldblat, and Jackie Kaisle discussing the role of AI in the federal geospatial landscape and demystifying common terminology. Panelists share diverse applications of AI they are working on, from detecting insights and optimizing workflows to image analysis for damage assessment and predicting disease outbreaks. They address the often vague definitions of terms like AI, machine learning, and LLMs, emphasizing the need for clarity and a "problem-first" approach. Challenges and opportunities with federal geospatial data include acquiring sufficient labeled data (discussing synthetic data and newer models), ensuring data quality, and using open standards. Ethical considerations are paramount, focusing on privacy, addressing biases (geographical, temporal, social/demographic), and the need for transparency and explainability in AI outputs. The panel stresses that AI is a tool requiring careful implementation and validation, not a magical shortcut, particularly in critical government applications where inaccuracies can have serious consequences. They discuss the relatively slow pace of federal AI adoption but see opportunities for time savings and leveraging collaboration across government, academia, and industry, recommending focus on proven solutions and community-led specifications rather than chasing every new trend. Ensuring accuracy for critical applications may involve methods like model factories and human-in-the-loop verification, while security concerns like "rag poisoning" highlight the need for trusted data sources and rigorous testing. • Panel discusses the use of AI in the federal geospatial space and aims to demystify related terminology. • Panelists share diverse applications including insights detection, workflow optimization, image analysis for damage assessment, and disease prediction. • Discusses the often vague definitions of AI, machine learning, LLMs, etc., and emphasizes the need for clarity. • Advocates for a "problem-first, model-second" approach to AI adoption. • Highlights challenges with federal geospatial data for AI, such as the need for labeled data, metadata quality, and leveraging open standards. • Explores concepts like synthetic data and newer zero-shot/one-shot models to address labeled data scarcity. • Emphasizes critical ethical considerations: privacy concerns (protecting personally identifiable information), addressing biases (geographical, temporal, social/demographic), and the need for transparency and explanability in AI outputs. • Stresses that AI is a tool requiring thoughtful understanding and implementation, not a magic shortcut. • Notes the relatively slow pace of AI adoption in the federal government but sees opportunities for time savings and efficiencies. • Discusses ensuring accuracy for critical applications, requiring validation, potentially using model factories and human verification. • Addresses security concerns, including the concept of "rag poisoning" for LLMs, highlighting the importance of trusted data sources and rigorous testing. • Suggests cutting through AI hype by focusing on proven, practical solutions. • Recommends collaboration across government, academia, and industry as crucial for advancing AI adoption. • Discusses the tension between setting standards and the rapid pace of AI development, suggesting community-led specifications (like STAC) might be more effective than rigid standards. For more content like this check out www.projectgeospatial.com #FedGeoDay #Geospatial #AI #MachineLearning #LLMs #ArtificialIntelligence #FederalGovernment #Resilience #EmergencyManagement #OpenSource #OpenData #Ethics #Bias #Cybersecurity #DataValidation #Collaboration #GIS

















