Skip to content
Artwork for Progressão
SportsSoccerScience

Progressão

Jani Sarajärvi

Progressão is a book, a podcast, and a long-term thinking project focused on football, learning, and skilful human behaviour. Our work approaches football from a complex, holistic, and ecological perspective, where players and all football actors are understood as living beings always in correspondence with their environment.

Play
  • 22 episodes
  • weekly
  • Avg 22 min
  • English
Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.
  • Tuesday · 53 min

    #206 DISCUSSÃO MUNDO: Mike Keeney – American soccer, skill, and what thirty years across continents teaches you

    Thirty years in football across five continents. The US, Finland, Slovakia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, including a stint in the UEFA Europa League. Mike Keeney has seen the game from enough angles to have well-informed opinions about what actually develops a player. He now leads the MLS NEXT program at Hoover-Vestavia Soccer in Birmingham, Alabama, and shapes the next generation of American coaches as an instructor on the US Soccer A Licence course. He holds a UEFA Pro Licence. In this conversation: what moving between football cultures teaches you about skill, and what gets left behind when you come home. The honest state of American soccer after a World Cup on home soil. Whether the cultural tendency toward athleticism over improvisation is really changing, or just being discussed. What an elite development environment looks like in Birmingham, Alabama in 2026. And, the pay-to-play model and how much potential the system isn't seeing. The Progressão book is on its way in English — more on that soon. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Instagram @progressaofi 👥 LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • August 18 · 12 min

    #205 Emotion is not noise: affective learning design in football

    A training session can be tactically representative with right distances, pressure, opponent behaviours, and still be missing something important. The feeling in the stomach before a decisive pass. The exhaustion of a fifth game in two weeks. The awareness that this moment might decide qualification. That ingredient has a name in the ecological dynamics literature: affect. And the conceptual framework related to it is called Affective Learning Design. Today we walk through the 2015 paper by Headrick, Renshaw, Davids, Pinder, and Araújo that framed this idea, and what it means for how we build sessions. In this episode: the difference between cold cognition and hot cognition, and why removing emotion from training doesn't clean it up but thins it out. Why emotion sharpens perception and strengthens memory, and what that means for which skills players carry into the game. The two principles of Affective Learning Design, and how to use them. Practical moves: vignettes, stakes, scrutiny, individualisation. Studies from dart throwing, police handgun training, basketball free throws, gymnastics and football, all pointing the same direction. Emotion is not noise. It is a constraint that shapes what a player perceives, decides and does. Time to design for it. Further reading Headrick, J., Renshaw, I., Davids, K., Pinder, R.A. & Araújo, D. (2015). The dynamics of expertise acquisition in sport: The role of affective learning design. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16(1), 83–90. The Progressão book is on its way in English — more on that soon. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Instagram @progressaofi 👥 LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • August 11 · 9 min

    #204 Manage the madness: three futsal principles football should steal

    Futsal is football's close cousin. Similar game logic, smaller space, less forgiveness. A bad angle shows up immediately, a lazy arrival is a shot on your own net. That density has forced futsal coaches to develop sharper language for certain moments than football coaches need to. Today we are going on a raid, walking into the futsal world to borrow three principles, the language and intentions that carry them, and bring them back to the football pitch. In this episode: why "manage the madness" is a great instruction and intention for a duel. What it actually means to "arrive with the ball", and why getting that timing right is a perceptual skill we often don't train. And "be electric" — the defender who keeps moving in small deceptive ways at set pieces, giving the deliverer conflicting information rather than being the statue the attacker is hoping for. All of the principles describe a way of being in the moment: alive, reading, adjusting. Steal them. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Instagram @progressaofi 👥 LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • August 4 · 15 min

    #203 In the storm and the silence: Turner, Pärt, and football as art

    Two artists. One tied himself to the mast of a ship in a real storm because painting storms from the shore was no longer enough. The other went silent for years — already recognised, already capable — because the music he was making was not yet the music that was truly his. One found the storm from the inside. The other found the silence, and from it, a new form the whole world now listens to. Today's episode is a slower one. We are sitting with J.M.W. Turner, the English painter, and Arvo Pärt, the Estonian composer, and thinking about what they might have to say to football. How they felt the world, and what we could learn from them. In this episode: what Turner's storm paintings — before and after he sailed into a real storm — tell us about the difference between observing the game and being inside it. Why the other Turner lesson is knowing when to put the brush down. Pärt's tintinnabuli, two voices that become one sound, and what it means for a small football nation to stop copying the big ones and find its own two notes. And why the crisis, the silence, the emptiness before new form arrives, is not something to escape but something to trust. The storm. The silence.

    • Transcript
  • July 28 · 12 min

    #202 Predictability is the enemy

    There is a debate that runs through football coaching like a fault line. On one side: all training should be game-based. On the other: players need drills with a lot of repetition. The two camps argue past each other, as if the choice is binary. It isn't. And a volleyball study can help us understand why. Today we walk through a 2023 paper by Paulo Caldeira and colleagues — research that sits close to the intellectual home of this podcast, with Duarte Araújo and Keith Davids among the authors. The setting is volleyball, but the implications belong to anyone who has thought about representativeness in their training. The study took skilled young players and gave both groups the same three attack options against the same three block configurations. Same possibilities, same reps. One difference only: one group knew in advance what was coming, the other had to read and decide in the moment. That single variable, pre-arranged versus emergent decision-making, changed everything. The group that had to read the situation improved substantially more, and kept improving after the study ended. In this episode: what representative decision-making actually means, and why a decision is representative when it is made off the same online information the game provides. What functional movement variability is, and why the best performers don't repeat one perfect technique but find slightly different solutions each time. Also, a football example of how to constrain the option space without losing the decision. Further reading Caldeira, P., Paulo, A., Veloso, A., Infante, J., Davids, K. & Araújo, D. (2023). How functional movement variability facilitates successful skill adaptation during the volleyball attack. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. The Progressão book is being translated into English — more on that soon. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Instagram @progressaofi 👥 LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • July 21 · 1 hr 6 min

    #201 DISCUSSÃO MUNDO: Roger "Ruxi" Bonet – Spain, the World Cup, and the team as skill

    Spain just won the World Cup. A highly coordinated team that played the movement, the relation, the shared language of a group that had been feeling the game the same way since they were children. To make sense of that, we called someone who has lived football from the inside — as a player across several continents, as a psychologist, as a coach, and as the founder of The Game Changer, a global football analysis community now active in over 20 countries. Roger "Ruxi" Bonet has also written the book Play with Purpose, and holds a UEFA Pro licence. In this episode: Spain's World Cup through the eyes of a person who watches the game analytically. What the tournament revealed about collective intelligence, and why the absence of a star scorer was not a weakness but the whole point. A case study of the final, Spain versus Argentina, as two completely different answers to the question of what football skill is and where it comes from. The rondo, the potrero, the street; whether you can see a player's upbringing in the way they move. And what Ruxi's years of playing in different countries taught him about football culture as a shaping force. The Progressão book is on its way in English — more on that soon. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Instagram @progressaofi 👥 LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • July 14 · 15 min

    #200 Two hundred Tuesdays: still Progressão

    Two hundred Tuesdays of trying to understand and explain why we as humans have previously misunderstood football. Where the feeling started? In a gap between the language of football and the actual game we were watching. In this episode, how the feeling led to Lisbon, to a doctorate, to a laboratory, to a book written under the trees of Parque Urbano de Jamor. How Jussi-Pekka Savolainen, Antti J. Peltonen and Harriet Huhtakangas shaped what you hear and read. And how nearly 140,000 downloads happened, one Tuesday at a time. This episode is also a compression of everything Progressão has been arguing all along — that the game is relational, that skill lives in player-environment correspondence and not inside the player alone, that the metaphors we think with quietly become the coaching we do. Two hundred episodes of trying to say that more clearly, more precisely, learning with other wandering spirits along the path. The Portuguese word progressão does not mean arrival. It means we are still moving. The feeling that started all of this is still here. Still Progressão. The Progressão book is being translated into English — more on that soon. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Instagram @progressaofi 👥 LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • July 7 · 19 min

    #199 Potentiality, not talent: why the forest matters more than the trees

    You are eleven years old. You love football. This game is yours. Then a piece of paper somewhere, a meeting you were never in, and a word gets attached to your name. Or doesn't. That word is talent. We have used it for decades like a flashlight, searching young bodies for something hidden inside them, something we could find if we looked hard enough, early enough. Find it, take it, water it. Leave the rest in the dark. This episode asks what happens under the ground while we are busy looking at the tree. The roots talk to each other down there. Fungus runs between them like nerve and vein, feeding the weak, warning the strong, holding the whole forest together as one breathing thing. Cut that down to save your one good trunk, and the trunk dies too. It was never standing alone. So we put forward a different word. Potentiality. Something that grows between a child and everyone who ever passed a ball to them, drove them to training, taught them a trick on a summer evening and forgot they ever did it. This one runs close to the bone of what Progressão has always tried to say — that a player is not a tree standing alone in a field, but a forest, and we're counting trees when we should be tending the soil. The Progressão book is being translated into English. More on that soon. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Instagram @progressaofi 👥 LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • June 30 · 13 min

    #198 Culture as a methodology

    Culture, in the language of the Aboriginal researcher Tyson Yunkaporta's people, has no direct word. Instead, they use a phrase that roughly translates as "being like our place." That is the idea this episode sits with: not culture as the backdrop to coaching, but culture as the methodology itself. This episode grew out of a conversation with two football experts, namely Adin Osmanbašić, Assistant Manager at FC Schalke 04, and Mario Hansi, Technical Director at the Estonian Football Association, who has spent years working at the intersection of culture, identity and football development. Something Adin said in that conversation, that culture isn't the context for the methodology but the methodology itself, set off everything that follows. In this episode: why ginga in Brazil and the quiet, individualised habits of Finnish football both come from worlds that shaped the people in them, not from training programmes. Why you can copy a club's sessions but not its culture, and why Barcelona's training plans don't produce Barcelona players. And, most importantly, why the culture is the methodology itself. This one also connects directly to the Progressão book which is currently being translated into English — more on that soon. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Instagram @progressaofi 👥 LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • June 23 · 50 min

    #197 DISCUSSÃO MUNDO: Rodrigo Picchioni – data, scouting, and what we can't measure

    Data scouting. One of the most intriguing and fast-developing corners of professional football. Most people have seen a heat map. Very few know what a Lead Data Scout actually does on a Tuesday afternoon, or what the method can genuinely explain about a player, and where it hits a wall. Rodrigo Picchioni built analytics department at Atlético Mineiro and now works at AS Monaco. In this conversation he crosses two worlds that rarely talk to each other directly: the rigour of data analysis and the deeper question of what we can do with data, and what not. In this episode: what data scouting actually is, how the Monaco model differs from what Rodrigo built in Brazil, and what the hardest things to quantify reveal about the limits of the field. The Moneyball promise — has analytics democratised football, or have rich clubs simply bought both the data and the best players? A provocation from @ThePurist on the felt connection between players and audience that precedes analysis. The most interesting version of this conversation is not data versus the eye. It is what it means to understand a footballer at all, and whether we are getting closer. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Instagram @progressaofi 👥 LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • June 16 · 12 min

    #196 Game models & Ecological dynamics

    Game models in football are discussed constantly. Most coaches have strong opinions about them, but fewer can describe their own model with depth — or stop to ask where the underlying thinking is actually leading them. In this episode: a new paper by Jones, Kubayi, Stone and Davids that reframes what a Game Model is and what it should do. The core argument is that when a Game Model becomes a script, meaning telling players what to do in advance, it reduces their exposure to the informational complexity of the real game. The player who has learned what to do stands waiting for the right moment to execute a pattern, instead of reading what the game is actually offering. Along the way: affordances and why they appear and disappear in seconds, the difference between skill acquisition and skill adaptation, constraints-led approach, coach feedback reframed as questions that direct attention rather than prescribe solutions, and a new way of visualising the Game Model itself as a continuous infinity loop with a Transition Nexus at its centre. A Sam Allardyce anecdote about the West Ham way, too, which lands well for this context. The thread underneath: if you're coaching from a traditional Game Model, you're trying to build a team that executes your system. If you're coaching from an ecological dynamics perspective, you're trying to build a team that reads the game and adapts. Further reading Jones, G., Kubayi, A., Stone, J.A. & Davids, K. (2026). Game Models in Football Coaching: An Ecological Dynamics Perspective. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Instagram @progressaofi 👥 LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • June 9 · 12 min

    #195 Trained for one game, faced another: a France U21 case on representative practice

    Representative practice is one of those ideas that sounds simple until a match shows you exactly where your training stopped being representative. France U21 against Estonia U21. Final score six to one, but the number that stayed was a specific moment that kept repeating: a lateral penetration, a final acceleration to the edge of the box, and a ball into the danger area at a pace nothing in camp had produced. Estonia had trained for exactly this situation. Sessions with coaches crossing on the byline, three distinct end actions, defenders sliding and reading. And still the game arrived at a tempo they had never once seen in training. That is not a player problem. That is a design problem. In this episode: representativeness and the difference between general intensity and specific intensity — and why confusing the two is one of the most common, most invisible failures in practice design. Why the problem is almost always in the design, not the player. And why "we trained that" and "we trained the version of that which actually shows up at this level" are two completely different comments. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Follow us on Instagram @progressaofi and LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • June 2 · 17 min

    #194 The metaphors football lives by

    Metaphor is the lens through which we actually see the game. Call a player a computer and you start looking for software to upgrade. Call a team a puzzle and you start developing pieces to assemble. The metaphor decides, quietly, what counts as a problem and what counts as a solution. In this episode: George Lakoff and Mark Johnson's foundational argument that metaphors shape how we think, not just how we speak, and what happens when you apply that to football. The reductionist family of metaphors that built modern coaching: the clock, the computer, the house, the pyramid, the toolbox, the puzzle. And the newer family challenging them: the radio, Tim Ingold's lines and meshworks, Bruce Lee's water, Rob Gray's Matrix. A study by Thibodeau and Boroditsky showing how a single metaphor change — beast versus virus — shifts what solutions people reach for. And what it actually means for coaching if skill is a relation rather than a possession. The thread underneath: the metaphors we inherit are not neutral. They highlight some things and hide others. And the ones football has lived by for decades may be leaking the most important parts of the game away. Further reading Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. Thibodeau, P. & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning. PLOS ONE. Ingold, T. (2015). The Life of Lines. Routledge. Brette, R. (2022). Brains as Computers: Metaphor, Analogy, Theory or Fact?. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Sontag, S. (1966). Against Interpretation. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Follow us on Instagram @progressaofi and LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • May 26 · 13 min

    #193 Resonance: the foundation of skill?

    Resonance starts as a simple idea from physics. Pluck a guitar string and the body of the instrument starts to vibrate with it. Two systems, coupled, moving together. James Gibson used the word as a synonym for attunement, to describe something much bigger: the way a perceiving organism tunes itself to the information in its environment. A great defender doesn't compute the game from inside his head. He resonates with it. In this episode, the first in the new monologue format, the conversation moves from Gibson's original intuition to the work of Vicente Raja, who has spent the last decade turning resonance from a metaphor into a testable scientific framework. Along the way: Anderson's neural reuse, tau-coupling, a study showing ecological resonance in human brain activity, Rúben Dias as a worked example, and what all of this means for how we design training environments. A small detour through Tim Ingold's "lines" too, because they turn out to describe the same phenomenon from a different angle. The thread underneath all of it: the player and the game are not two things interacting. They are one coupled system, and the coach's job is to build the conditions in which that coupling can develop. Vicente Raja's research 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Follow us on Instagram @progressaofi and LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • May 19 · 41 min

    #192 DISCUSSÃO MUNDO: Vicente Raja – radical embodiment and resonance

    Welcome to the Progressão podcast. As Progressão now continues in English, we are revisiting some of our earlier Discussão conversations — episodes that have stayed with us and still feel highly relevant today. In this episode, we are joined by Dr. Vicente Raja, a researcher working at the intersection of ecological psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy. His work explores the relationship between brain, behaviour, and environment through ideas such as radical embodiment and resonance. In this conversation, we dive into these concepts and reflect on what they might mean for understanding skill, learning, and coaching. A thoughtful and wide-ranging discussion that connects science, philosophy, and practice. Vicente Raja on ResearchGate 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Follow us on Instagram @progressaofi and LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • May 12 · 14 min

    #191 Representative design: does your training really reflect the game?

    Welcome to the Progressão podcast. In this episode, we continue our journey from drills and games, through situations, and now into one of the key concepts of ecological dynamics: representative design. In football, training often looks organised, structured, and even very “game-like”. But does it truly represent the demands players face in matches? In this episode, we explore how learning depends on the relationship between the player and the environment, especially on the information available, how it is perceived, and how action emerges from it. We discuss key ideas such as perception–action coupling and action fidelity, and why even small differences in timing, spacing, or pressure can completely change player behaviour. Through practical examples, from finishing and pressing to rondos and positional games, we reflect on why some exercises transfer to the game, while others only appear to. Representative design is about identifying the essential elements of football situations and bringing those into training in a meaningful way. Articles mentioned in the episode: Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2011). Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(1), 146–155. Full article Headrick, J., Renshaw, I., Davids, K., Pinder, R. A., & Araújo, D. (2015). The dynamics of expertise acquisition in sport: The role of affective learning design. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16(Part 1), 83–90. Full article 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Follow us on Instagram @progressaofi and LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • May 5 · 14 min

    #190 Beyond small-sided games: train the situation

    Welcome to the Progressão podcast. In our previous episode, we questioned the common debate around drills versus games and explored whether this is the right way to understand training in football. This week, we take the discussion further and focus on small-sided games and situation-based exercises. Small-sided games are widely used in modern coaching and are often seen as an ideal way to train the game. But are they always representative of what actually happens in matches? In this episode, we explore some of the limitations of small-sided games, from differences in distances and timing to how pressure is experienced in real situations. From there, we introduce another approach that may complement small-sided games: situation-based exercises. Football is not just a continuous flow, it is made up of recurring situations. Build up under pressure, press releases, lateral penetration, defending crosses. These moments appear again and again, and becoming skilful means learning to act effectively within them. Through concrete examples, we discuss how training can be designed to reflect these situations more closely, connecting players to meaningful information in the game environment. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Follow us on Instagram @progressaofi and LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • April 28 · 12 min

    #189 Drills vs games: a false debate?

    Welcome to the Progressão podcast. In this episode, we take on one of the most common debates in football coaching: drills versus games. Should players first learn technique through repetition, and then apply it in the game? Or should learning take place directly through game-like situations? These questions are often discussed as if they represent two separate methods. But in this episode, we suggest that this might be the wrong way to look at training altogether. Building on our earlier discussions around ecological dynamics and skill, we explore how different theoretical perspectives — especially information-processing and ecological approaches — shape the way coaches design training. We discuss why the distinction between drills and games can be misleading, how the same exercise can be understood in very different ways, and why learning in football may be better understood as a holistic, relational process rather than a collection of isolated parts. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Follow us on Instagram @progressaofi and LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • April 21 · 12 min

    #188 Game intelligence: back to nature

    Welcome to the Progressão podcast. In Episode 187, we opened the discussion around game intelligence by revisiting the more traditional definitions of the concept — a view where game intelligence is often treated as a separate cognitive component involving perception, anticipation, and decision-making. This week, we take the discussion further. Or perhaps more accurately, we take it back to nature. What if game intelligence is not something that sits inside the player as a separate mental component? What if skilful action is better understood through the relationship between the player and the environment? In this episode, we use examples from nature — plants, box jellyfish, and wolves — to challenge the idea that intelligence must always be brain-based. From there, we move into the ecological view of football, where perception and action are inseparable, and where skill emerges through attunement to meaningful information in the environment. Drawing especially from two key propositions, we argue that game intelligence is the ability to establish a meaningful connection with the environment, and that skill learning is the process of becoming attuned to ecological information and organising action within an information-rich world. From Jari Litmanen to affordances, direct perception, and the human–environment system, this episode continues our journey toward understanding football as a living, relational, and deeply ecological phenomenon. Further reading from the ideas discussed in this episode: Bielecki, J., Dam Nielsen, S. K., Nachman, G., & Garm, A. (2023). Associative learning in the box jellyfish Tripedalia cystophora. Current Biology. Gable, T. D., Homkes, A. T., Johnson-Bice, S. M., Windels, S. K., & Bump, J. K. (2021). Wolves choose ambushing locations to counter and capitalize on the sensory abilities of their prey. Behavioral Ecology, 32(2), 339–348. Mech, L. D., Smith, D. W., & MacNulty, D. R. (2015). Wolves on the Hunt. University of Chicago Press. Segundo‐Ortin, M., & Calvo, P. (2022). Consciousness and cognition in plants. WIREs Cognitive Science, 13(2). 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Follow us on Instagram @progressaofi and LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
  • April 14 · 11 min

    #187 Game intelligence

    Welcome to the Progressão podcast. This week, we open a discussion around one of the most used, and perhaps least clearly understood, concepts in football: game intelligence. What do we actually mean when we say that a player has great game intelligence? Is it the ability to see passes others do not see? To position intelligently? To make the right decision at the right time? In football, terms such as game intelligence, game understanding, and decision making are used constantly, yet there is still no clear consensus on what they truly mean. In this episode, we explore both the traditional and the more contemporary ways of understanding the concept. We discuss older cognitive definitions that frame game intelligence as a separate mental component involving perception, anticipation, and decision-making, and contrast these with ecological perspectives that view skill as something emerging in the ongoing relationship between player and environment. From players like Jari Litmanen to deeper philosophical questions about perception and action, this episode asks what skill actually is in the game. Is game intelligence something inside the brain? Or is it better understood as skilful attunement to the game itself? A foundational episode in our ongoing series on football as a complex and ecological phenomenon. 🌍 More at progressao.fi 📷 Follow us on Instagram @progressaofi and LinkedIn @Project Progressão

    • Transcript
Showing 1–20 of 22 episodes