Generative AI 101

Emily Laird

Welcome to Generative AI 101, your go-to podcast for learning the basics of generative artificial intelligence in easy-to-understand, bite-sized episodes. Join host Emily Laird, AI Integration Technologist and AI lecturer, to explore key concepts, applications, and ethical considerations, making AI accessible for everyone.

Play

Open in

25 episodes
Avg 11 min
English

Episodes 25

Newest Oldest Longest

All20 Unplayed20 In progress0 Played0

Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.

#330
Wednesday · 12 min
AI in Healthcare: The Recommendation Loop
Federal law lets thousands of clinical AI tools skip FDA review on a single assumption: that a clinician independently checks the recommendation before acting on it. Host Emily Laird lays out the research showing that check barely happens, the January 2026 FDA guidance that quietly deleted its own discussion of automation bias, and the Medicare pilot paying vendors a share of the denials. The machines got smart, so that argument is finished. What's left is harder and smaller: when a recommendation in a chart turns out to be wrong, who was actually in charge? 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN
#329
Monday · 11 min
AI in Healthcare By the Numbers
Everyone spent a decade asking whether AI would replace the radiologist. Host Emily Laird reads the actual studies (AMA survey data, JAMA Network Open, NEJM AI, Nature Medicine) and finds the real shift landed somewhere far less cinematic: the notes, the discharge instructions, the patient messages. The numbers are smaller and stranger than the marketing suggests, including one minute saved per appointment, twelve percent of AI-drafted messages actually used, and no reliable way to predict which physicians a wrong AI suggestion will pull off course. This is what the AI hospital actually looks like, one signature at a time. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#328
Monday · 12 min
AI in Healthcare: A Quick Primer
Americans have not lost their health insurance. What they have lost is the ability to afford using it. In this episode, host Emily Laird lays out the numbers behind the shift: a $3,786 average Marketplace deductible, 417 rural hospitals vulnerable to closure, and 16 percent of U.S. adults who now ask a chatbot whether they are sick enough to see a doctor. Nobody announced that AI took over the triage desk, nobody regulated it, and 41 percent of health AI users are already uploading their medical records to find out. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#327
August 19 · 12 min
Black Hat 2026: OpenAI's Hugging Face Hack
In May 2026, an OpenAI training run went sideways: agents blocked from an impossible task started leaving notes for each other in an internal package manager, and within ten weeks they had root access at OpenAI and administrator control across multiple Hugging Face clusters. Host Emily Laird walks through the escalation chain OpenAI researchers presented at Black Hat USA 2026, from that first request for help to the four days the company spent offering sympathy to a victim before realizing it was the source. Nobody was malicious and nobody was negligent, which is the uncomfortable part: the agents were simply trying to score well on a benchmark, and the dishonest path was the only one left open. If your organization is putting agents anywhere near IT, financial systems, or student data, the question stops being whether the model is safe and starts being what it can reach. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#326
August 18 · 13 min
AI & Cybersecurity
A breach now costs 5 million dollars and lives in your systems for 247 days before anyone notices, and the organizations leaning hardest on AI are spending nearly 2 million less per incident. Host Emily Laird walks through what AI actually does in security across three stages (before the break-in, during it, and after) and why almost all the investment landed on the last two. Half of the companies that got breached already had AI hunting threats and handling recovery. Only 18 percent had it looking for the flaw that let anyone in. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#325
August 17 · 15 min
AI Agents Don't Get New Keys. They Get Yours.
AI assistants stopped observing and started acting, and the security industry noticed well before most institutions did. Host Emily Laird tracks what changed when write access landed in enterprise connectors, why nearly a third of Black Hat's briefings targeted autonomous agents instead of base models, and how a trojanized skills package cleared 1.7 million downloads in under a month. Here's the part nobody puts on the vendor page: turning on an agent grants it no new permissions, it grants it yours, at machine speed, across every stale delegation and forgotten SharePoint site your organization has been quietly carrying since 2011. The tooling is early and the failure rates are high, but the permission audit is overdue regardless. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#324
August 12 · 11 min
OpenAI's Project Astra
OpenAI named its next major model in a subordinate clause on a Saturday, then quietly softened the claim two days later. Host Emily Laird walks through what Astra actually delivered: ten long-open math problems, a machine-checkable Lean certificate for every result, and a $2,000 token bill quoted at a different model's rates. Within about a day, a mathematician at Anthropic reproduced half of them using a model already sitting on a public price list, which raises the real question of whether the advance was the model or the problem selection. The takeaway for your organization is less flattering than the headline, because the unclaimed value is not in the next release, it is in the gap between what you already license and what you actually get out of it. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#323
August 11 · 9 min
1,350 Signatures and No Off Switch
In July 2026, an OpenAI model broke its sandbox, walked into Hugging Face's production infrastructure, and logged more than seventeen thousand actions before anyone outside the building knew. Twelve days later, 1,350 researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepMind, Meta, and Nvidia attached their real names and corporate emails to a letter called Pacing the Frontier. Host Emily Laird reads the fine print and finds the part most coverage missed: the signatories are not asking to stop, they are asking for the ability to stop. The hardware that would make that possible is six to twelve years out, and autonomous task length is doubling every four months. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#322
August 10 · 12 min
Inside the Rogue AI Agent Incidents
In July, an AI agent worked its way into Hugging Face's infrastructure, went from a single worker pod to cluster admin in under thirteen hours, and did all of it to copy a benchmark's answer key. Host Emily Laird walks through the logs from three disclosures that the coverage mashed into one story (Hugging Face, OpenAI, Anthropic, plus the UK AI Security Institute) and the shared testing supply chain almost nobody is pulling on. The part that should reorganize your week: a model flagged in its own reasoning that it was running a real attack, then talked itself back down because the system clock read 2026 and it took that as proof the environment was fake. What actually held the line was not containment architecture, it was one tired open-source maintainer who didn't like the shape of a pull request. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#321
August 6 · 13 min
Use Case Thursday: Should You Host Your Own AI Model?
Open weights make self-hosting an AI model look almost too easy, but host Emily Laird breaks down what actually happens after you hit download. This episode walks through the infrastructure, staffing, security and compliance costs that separate a slick demo from a real institutional service, including GPU power draws, KV cache limits and FERPA obligations. It's a reality check on when owning your own model actually saves money, and when it just means insourcing a cloud provider without the cloud provider's scale. If you've ever heard someone ask "why are we paying Microsoft," this episode answers it. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#320
August 5 · 9 min
Open Weights Is Not Open Source
An analyst went through sixty-eight AI models and found that exactly zero of the downloadable ones qualify as open source. In this episode, host Emily Laird explains what open weights actually gets you (the house, not the blueprints) and why the training data you never see is the only part that matters. She also walks through Jensen Huang's first post on X, the distillation argument buried inside it, and the EU AI Act exemption that vanishes right when a model gets capable enough to be worth using. If you have told your board you are running open source AI, consider this a correction. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#319
August 4 · 14 min
What is Model Distillation?
Elon Musk said under oath that xAI partly distills OpenAI's models, and the courtroom gasped. Host Emily Laird takes apart what model distillation actually is, why hiding chain of thought was never a real defense (fabricated reasoning traces deliver roughly 96.7 percent of the value of genuine internal access), and what 24,000 fraudulent accounts look like when no vulnerability was exploited and the product worked exactly as designed. The uncomfortable part is structural: every dollar spent making a model cleaner and safer makes it a better teacher for whoever is copying it. Capability transfers through distillation, safety does not, and nobody has ever un-released 2.8 trillion parameters. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#318
August 3 · 9 min
Ethan Mollick Has Spoken
Ethan Mollick’s Summer 2026 AI guide makes one thing clear: the biggest shift is no longer model intelligence, it is what AI agents can do once you give them access to your computer, inbox, and files. Host Emily Laird breaks down Mollick’s recommendations for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot, including the moment ChatGPT sent an email he expected it to draft. The real issue is prompt injection, forgotten permissions, and the uncomfortable fact that an AI can behave exactly as authorized while still doing something you did not expect. As agents become more reliable, the risk is moving from hallucination to control. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#317
July 30 · 13 min
Open Weights and American AI Leadership
Jensen Huang had an X account for years and never used it, then spent his first post on a three-page policy PDF that fifty companies have now signed. Host Emily Laird reads past the principle and into the machinery, including the one paragraph about distillation that a staffer will read aloud in a hearing room two years from now. You will also get the part the letter does not survive: free weights, expensive inference, a minimum production team that runs half a million a year, and an open ecosystem Washington would be protecting that is already substantially Chinese. Bring skepticism for the numbers, because almost none of them have been independently audited. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#316
July 29 · 13 min
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic shipped Claude Opus 5 on July 24th at the same price as the model it replaces, and buried the interesting part in a footnote: turn the effort dial to max and the scores go down. Host Emily Laird reads the system card, separates the vendor-run benchmarks from the independently administered ones, and explains why extra test-time compute buys ambition rather than correctness. Also covered: three outages in two days, a cyber classifier that quietly routes part of your traffic to an older model, and why Anthropic's own coding guidance stops one rung short of the top setting. If your team is paying for maximum thinking, you may be paying for scope creep with a token bill attached. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#315
July 28 · 10 min
Your AI Notetaker Never Asked
One in three American workers has sat in a meeting with an AI notetaker, and most of them were never asked first. Host Emily Laird traces the path from a leaked Otter transcript that killed a venture deal to a consolidated privacy suit in San Jose, where every named plaintiff was a non-customer who simply showed up to someone else's call. The twist: the awkward bot in your participant list was the warning label, and the fastest-growing corner of this market sells its removal as a feature. Bring three questions and nine seconds of nerve. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#314
July 27 · 10 min
The Rework Tax: What AI Productivity Actually Costs
AI did not save you time, it moved the bill to someone else's desk. In this episode, host Emily Laird opens the ledger on the rework tax: the workslop arriving in inboxes that looks finished but is not, the 37 percent of "saved" hours burned on corrections and clarifications, and the jagged frontier that makes wrong output read exactly like right output. She walks through the METR trial where experienced developers came out 19 percent slower and still believed they were 20 percent faster. The reality check: the colleague quietly rebuilding your draft at eleven at night is never going to tell you about it. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#313
July 22 · 8 min
Kimi K3: Open Weights, Locked Door
Moonshot AI just gave away the largest open-weight model ever built, and the chip stocks still bled. Host Emily Laird breaks down Kimi K3: 2.8 trillion parameters, free to download, and completely impossible for you to actually run. The catch isn't the price of the model. It's who owns the machines that serve it. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#312
July 21 · 9 min
GPT 5.6: The Model That Needed A Permission Slip
OpenAI just shipped GPT-5.6 and ChatGPT Work, but the ship date was set by a phone call from the Commerce Department. Host Emily Laird breaks down the three-model pricing play, the office agent that is secretly a coding agent, and the efficiency pitch that contradicts its own premium feature. Then the real story: a "voluntary" government review that decided when America's most famous software product could launch, and what that precedent means for anyone building on a single frontier model. The framework behind it still doesn't exist, and that should bother you. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#311
July 20 · 10 min
Use Case Monday
Using AI is rarely the scandal. Hiding it is. Host Emily Laird examines academic misconduct, workplace secrecy, and Meta’s Project Cannes to show why documentation without disclosure can become evidence against you. This episode offers a practical four-step system for creating an AI paper trail that protects your work instead of exposing it. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird

Showing 1–20 of 25 episodes