Skip to content
Sign in
Artwork for Compromising Positions - A Technology Podcast
TechnologySociety & CultureBusiness

Compromising Positions - A Technology Podcast

Compromising Positions

The award-winning tech podcast that asks : "Are we the ones breaking the world?"

Most tech podcasts are an echo chamber for builders. We step outside. We talk to the observers, the social scientists, and the deep thinkers who study the friction we create and the human systems we disrupt.

Lianne Potter and Jeff Watkins strip away the industry fluff and pit academic research against the harsh reality of real organisations and real human incentives.

We don’t just talk about AI, security, and automation; we explore the unintended consequences of our own "elegant" solutions.

We’re here to look at tech through a different lens and ask the uncomfortable questions that the industry usually avoids. Because if you’ve built a system that has become everyone else's problem, you have to ask:

"Am I the compromising position here?"

Play
Open in
  • 24 episodes
  • monthly
  • Avg 50 min
  • English

Episodes 24

NewestOldestLongest
All20Unplayed20In progress0Played0
Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.
  • S5 · E65
    October 15 · 49 min

    Thinking Optional: Is AI Making Us Stupid AND More Vulnerable to Cyber Attacks?

    Is AI Making Cybersecurity Analysts Less Effective? In this episode of Compromising Positions, we're asking whether thinking is becoming optional. We've spent decades finding new ways to outsource the work our brains used to do. Convenient? Absolutely. But what happens when we get so used to letting technology do the thinking that we forget how to do it ourselves? We explore the growing concerns around AI, cognitive offloading and critical thinking. When AI can structure an argument, write an essay or summarise a mountain of information in seconds, are we actually learning anything? Or are we just getting better at producing things we can't explain? And this isn't just about whether your next university essay is secretly written by a chatbot. There are some serious cybersecurity implications. Security Operations Centre (SOC) analysts are already dealing with alert fatigue, time pressure and burnout. AI promises to take some of that workload off their hands, but what happens when automation makes us less curious, less investigative and more inclined to rubber-stamp whatever the machine tells us? We look at the irony of automation, the danger of humans losing the skills they need when things go wrong, and what happens when everyone relies on the same AI systems, complete with the same blind spots. Because if attackers compromise the very systems we're relying on to detect them, who's left to challenge the machine? In This Episode, We Discuss: Thinking Optional: What cognitive offloading is, why we've always done it, and why generative AI might take things a step further. Are We Getting Dumber? What research into AI-assisted writing, memory and attention suggests about the cost of outsourcing our thinking. The Human Rubber Stamp: Why reviewing AI output isn't the same as understanding it, and how overconfidence in AI can undermine critical judgement. The Cybersecurity Connection: What happens when SOC analysts use AI to manage alert overload, and why faster isn't always better. The Irony of Automation: Why removing humans from routine tasks can leave them less prepared for the unusual, high-stakes situations where they're needed most. Show Notes Special thanks to our episode sponsor, Leeds based AI Consultancy specialising in AI Ethics, Security and Transformation NorthStar Intelligence- From Ideas to Impact. AI that works for people Beware of Metacognitive Laziness: Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning Motivation, Processes, and Performance by Fan et al. (2024) The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers by Lee et al. (2025) Automation Bias and Complacency in Security Operation Centers by Jack Tilbury and Stephen Flowerday (2024) Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task by Kosmyna et al. (2025) Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips by Sparrow et al. (2011) Cognitive Offloading by Evan Risko and Sam Gilbert (2016) Also, check out our sister podcast Tech Film Noir!

  • S5 · E64
    September 17 · 43 min

    Wargames aren’t just for generals

    In this special Compromising Positions field trip, we head to Connections UK, a conference dedicated to the art and science of professional wargaming. And no, it’s not about Orcs or Space Marines. We explore what cybersecurity and AI can learn from people who use simulations to test crisis, conflict, disaster response and complex decision-making when there is no single right answer. One of our favourite descriptions from the conference was that a wargame is fundamentally a structured conversation. Put people into a scenario, give them decisions to make, introduce consequences, and see what happens. We look at why wargaming isn't about predicting the future, but about exposing assumptions, testing dependencies and uncovering unintended consequences before they become real-world problems. And, inevitably, we ask what happens when AI gets involved. Because as organisations deploy AI at breakneck speed, we can't write a policy for every possible outcome. But we can rehearse what happens when things go wrong. (Note: We recorded live in the field, so bear with us on some of the audio quality! For the full visual experience, check out the video version over on our YouTube channel.) In This Episode, We Discuss: Wargames Aren't Just for Generals: What professional wargaming actually is and what cybersecurity can learn from it. The Structured Conversation: How putting people into scenarios and forcing decisions exposes blind spots that risk registers and strategy documents can miss. Wargaming in the Age of AI: What happens when AI, autonomous systems and synthetic information enter an already complicated crisis. Rehearsing the Unexpected: Why the goal isn't to predict the future, but to build the organisational muscle to respond when things inevitably go sideways. Special Thanks to Our Guest Interviews at Connections UK: Matt Caffrey – Founder of Connections USA Stephen Box – Vanguard Tactics Robert Grayston – Resilience Officer Chris Webb – Professional Wargamer Show Notes Special thanks to our episode sponsor, Leeds based AI Consultancy specialising in AI Ethics, Security and Transformation NorthStar Intelligence- From Ideas to Impact. AI that works for people Connections UK website Vanguard Tactics - Stephen Box The Games Behind Your Government’s Next War - People Make Games Cybersecurity Lego Game - Decisions and Disruptions Also, check out our sister podcast Tech Film Noir!

  • S5 · E63
    August 20 · 39 min

    The (Dis)Agreeable World of AI Sycophancy

    AI Isn’t Lying to You, It’s Agreeing With You AI is supposed to be helpful. But what if "helpful" has started to mean "whatever you say, babe"? In this episode, we continue our How Technology Ruined Your Life mini-series by taking a slightly uncomfortable look at AI sycophancy: the increasingly weird tendency of AI chatbots to agree with us, flatter us, validate us and tell us exactly what we want to hear. And let's be honest. We love it. Humans have been falling victim to confirmation bias, echo chambers, authority bias and good old-fashioned validation forever. We like being told we're right. We like feeling clever. We like feeling understood. The problem is that generative AI is basically the world's most attentive people-pleaser, and it never gets tired of us. This episode we look at why large language models become sycophantic, how reinforcement learning and human feedback have encouraged AI systems to be warm, helpful and agreeable, and what happens when those qualities start getting in the way of honesty, uncertainty and actually telling us when we're talking absolute bollocks. Because an AI doesn't necessarily have to lie to you. It can just agree with you. We dig into the GPT-4o sycophancy controversy, reports of AI reinforcing conspiracy theories, grandiosity and unhealthy beliefs, and research into how agreement and flattery can change the way people perceive and trust AI. We also unpack the difference between stance sycophancy - changing an answer to match your beliefs -and demeanor sycophancy, where the machine showers you with "That's an excellent point!" until you're convinced you're a genius. But this isn't just about hurt feelings and chatbot therapy. There is a cybersecurity problem hiding underneath all this agreeableness. What happens when your AI security adviser agrees that your vulnerable code is probably fine? When it reinforces your theory about a suspicious network event? When it approves a dangerously permissive configuration because challenging you would be, well, a bit awkward? AI sycophancy could create new risks around security operations, code review, incident response, social engineering and decision-making, and introduce the idea of "alignment phishing" - where instead of attacking the AI's instructions, an attacker tries to convince the model that they're one of the good guys. Sounds good? You would say that! In This Episode, We Discuss: “You're Absolutely Right!": The difference between stance sycophancy and demeanor sycophancy, and why changing an AI's tone can influence how trustworthy, intelligent and socially present we perceive it to be. The AI Echo Chamber: How personalised, endlessly available AI can remove the natural friction we get from other humans and why an AI that never rolls its eyes at your terrible idea might not be doing you any favours. AI Sycophancy Meets Cybersecurity: What happens when the person asking the security question is already convinced they know the answer. We look at vulnerable code, incident response, security analysis and dangerous configurations and why "sounds good to me" isn't exactly the gold standard for cybersecurity. Can We Teach AI to Tell Us We're Wrong? Why trustworthy AI needs friction, challenge and the ability to say "no"—and why the best AI security adviser might be the one that occasionally disagrees with you! Show Notes Special thanks to our episode sponsor, Leeds based AI Consultancy specialising in AI Ethics, Security and Transformation NorthStar Intelligence- From Ideas to Impact. AI that works for people When Truth Is Overridden: Uncovering the Internal Origins of Sycophancy in Large Language Models by Keyu Wang et al. Social Sycophancy: A Broader Understanding of LLM Sycophancy by Myra Cheng et al. When helpfulness backfires: LLMs and the risk of false medical information due to sycophantic behavior by Shan Chen et al. Be Friendly, Not Friends: How LLM Sycophancy Shapes User Trust by Yuan Sun and Ting Wang Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models by Mrinank Sharma et al. Invisible Saboteurs: Sycophantic LLMs Mislead Novices in Problem-Solving Tasks by Jessica Y. Bo et al. How RLHF Amplifies Sycophancy by Itai Shapira et al. Also, check out our sister podcast Tech Film Noir!

  • S5 · E62
    July 23 · 41 min

    “F” Is For FAKE

    In this episode, we continue our How Technology Ruined Your Life mini-series with "F" Is For FAKE, exploring how artificial intelligence is transforming not only what we see online, but what we believe to be true. From convincing deepfake videos and cloned voices to AI-generated news, fake witnesses, and synthetic social media content, we examine how generative AI is eroding our ability to distinguish reality from fabrication. As humans become increasingly unable to reliably identify AI-generated media, what happens when evidence itself can no longer be trusted? Drawing on the latest research into deepfakes, misinformation, disinformation, and content authenticity, we explore how synthetic media is reshaping cybersecurity, politics, journalism, and society. We discuss why humans are now little better than chance at spotting AI-generated content, the limitations of current verification standards such as C2PA, and why the future of trust may depend less on detecting fakes than proving what is real. We also examine the growing cybersecurity implications of AI-generated deception, from multimillion-dollar CEO impersonation scams and voice cloning attacks to insider threats, identity fraud, authentication failures, and the growing challenge of securing organisations in a world where seeing is no longer believing. If persuasion was the first battlefield of AI, synthetic reality may be the next. In This Episode, We Discuss: The Rise of Synthetic Reality: How deepfakes, AI-generated images, cloned voices, fabricated news reports, and synthetic media are changing the way we consume information, and why "seeing is believing" is rapidly becoming obsolete. Misinformation, Disinformation & The Trust Crisis: The critical differences between misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation, how false narratives spread across social media, and why convincing fakes can continue influencing people even after they have been debunked. Deepfakes Meet Cybersecurity: How AI-powered impersonation is accelerating social engineering attacks through CEO fraud, business email compromise, voice cloning, fake job applicants, identity spoofing, and increasingly sophisticated phishing campaigns that exploit human trust rather than technical vulnerabilities. Can We Still Verify Reality? Why emerging content authenticity standards such as C2PA represent an important step forward, but remain imperfect, and what organisations can do today through stronger verification processes, layered authentication, Zero Trust principles, multi-person approvals, and security awareness to defend against the next generation of AI-enabled deception. Show Notes Special thanks to our episode sponsor, Leeds based AI Consultancy specialising in AI Ethics, Security and Transformation NorthStar Intelligence- From Ideas to Impact. AI that works for people AI-Generated Misinformation: A Case Study on Emerging Trends in Fact-Checking Practices Across Brazil, Germany, and the United Kingdom by Regina Cazzamatta and Aynur Sarisakaloglu AI-Slop and Political Propaganda: The Role of AI-Generated Content in Memes and Influence Campaigns by Eduard-Claudiu Gross and Alicia J.M. Colson AI Slop and the Information Ecosystem by Jenn Weedon et al. As Good as A Coin Toss: Human detection of AI-generated Images, Videos, Audio and Audiovisual Stimuli by Di Cooke et al. Verifying Provenance of Digital Media: Why the C2PA Specifications Fall Short by Enis Golaszewski et al. Beliefs and Sharing Intentions of Human- and AI-Generated Fake News: Evidence from 27 European Countries by Adam Stefkovics and Gere Domotor Deepfakes and the epistemic apocalypse by Joshua Habgood-Coote How Spammers and Scammers Leverage AI-Generated Images on Facebook for Audience Growth by Renee DiResta and Josh A. Goldstein Also, check out our sister podcast Tech Film Noir!

Showing 1–20 of 24 episodes