Skip to content
Artwork for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments · April 22 · 1 hr 29 min

Blanche v. Lau

A case in which the Court held that the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) does not require a border officer to possess clear and convincing evidence that a lawful permanent resident has committed a crime involving moral turpitude before treating that resident as an applicant for admission rather than someone already admitted to the country.

0:00-1:29:33

transcript

No transcript — this publisher did not publish one.

show notes

A case in which the Court held that the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) does not require a border officer to possess clear and convincing evidence that a lawful permanent resident has committed a crime involving moral turpitude before treating that resident as an applicant for admission rather than someone already admitted to the country.

more episodes

All episodes