
The True Crime Tapes · Today · 52 min
Mega Edition: Bryan Kohberger And The Motion To Dismiss (8/9/26)
0:00-52:15
transcript
show notes
Bryan Kohberger’s defense sought to have the indictment against him dismissed by attacking the grand-jury process that produced the four first-degree murder charges and burglary charge. In one motion, the defense argued that the grand jury had been given the wrong legal standard when it was told that it could indict Kohberger upon finding probable cause. His attorneys contended that Idaho law and its historical development required a much higher standard, essentially arguing that the grand jury should have been instructed to determine whether the evidence established the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense maintained that because the grand jury had operated under the lower probable-cause threshold, the indictment was legally defective and should either be dismissed or the case returned to a preliminary hearing. The court rejected that interpretation, concluding that Idaho law clearly established probable cause as the proper standard for a grand jury deciding whether sufficient evidence existed to send a defendant to trial.
Kohberger’s attorneys also filed a broader motion attacking what had actually occurred before the grand jury. They alleged that the grand jury had been biased, that prosecutors had presented inadmissible or insufficient evidence, and that the state had committed prosecutorial misconduct by withholding potentially exculpatory information from the jurors. In effect, the defense argued that the indictment could not be trusted because the grand jury had not received a sufficiently fair or legally sound presentation of the case against Kohberger. Judge John Judge ultimately rejected those claims as well, finding that Kohberger had not demonstrated juror bias, prosecutorial misconduct, or an absence of sufficient admissible evidence. The court determined that an impartial grand jury had heard enough evidence to establish probable cause that Kohberger committed the charged crimes, leaving the indictment intact and allowing the prosecution to continue toward trial.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Kohberger’s attorneys also filed a broader motion attacking what had actually occurred before the grand jury. They alleged that the grand jury had been biased, that prosecutors had presented inadmissible or insufficient evidence, and that the state had committed prosecutorial misconduct by withholding potentially exculpatory information from the jurors. In effect, the defense argued that the indictment could not be trusted because the grand jury had not received a sufficiently fair or legally sound presentation of the case against Kohberger. Judge John Judge ultimately rejected those claims as well, finding that Kohberger had not demonstrated juror bias, prosecutorial misconduct, or an absence of sufficient admissible evidence. The court determined that an impartial grand jury had heard enough evidence to establish probable cause that Kohberger committed the charged crimes, leaving the indictment intact and allowing the prosecution to continue toward trial.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com