Skip to content
Artwork for The Observable Unknown
The Observable Unknown · Wednesday · 7 min

Mailbag XXXVII: When the World Feels Like It’s Ending | Doomscrolling, Anxiety, Information Overload, Insomnia, and Temporal Collapse

Why does the world suddenly feel as though it’s falling apart? What happens when war, politics, economic uncertainty, social conflict, catastrophe, technology, and other people’s crises arrive through the same screen, all day, every day? And how do you find your footing when everything begins to feel urgent at once? In Mailbag XXXVII of The Observable Unknown, Dr. Juan Carlos Rey responds to Richard L., a listener who says the world has begun to feel frighteningly strange, disconnected, magnified, and increasingly unmanageable. Richard describes a sense that something may be wrong with him because nearly everything around him appears unstable. Technology seems to deliver too much information too quickly. Economic pressures add another layer of uncertainty. People feel distant from one another, while every problem seems larger than it once did. The anxiety has begun interfering with his sleep. He asks a deceptively simple question: How do I find my footing again? Dr. Rey begins by separating two very different statements: “The world contains frightening things.” and: “The whole world is ending.” The first may describe genuine conditions. The second may be a conclusion produced by a nervous system struggling to process too many threats at once. That distinction becomes the foundation of an episode about doomscrolling, information overload, anxiety, social media, insomnia, nervous-system regulation, uncertainty, media consumption, and the psychological effects of continuous exposure to crisis. Richard uses a revealing phrase in his letter: “People knowing too much too fast.” For most of human history, frightening events possessed distance. A disaster could occur somewhere else. A political crisis might reach people hours or days later. A conflict unfolding thousands of miles away didn’t necessarily enter the bedroom before sleep. Digital technology has changed that relationship with information. A war, wildfire, market decline, murder, political scandal, natural disaster, celebrity crisis, personal tragedy, and ordinary social update can now arrive within moments of one another. All of them occupy the same screen. All of them compete for the same attention. The nervous system receives the sequence without any natural distinction between what requires immediate action and what requires none. The feed simply presents the next event. Dr. Rey connects this experience to the availability heuristic, associated with psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. When examples of danger, conflict, or catastrophe become extremely easy to recall, people may begin judging those events as more common, immediate, or probable than they otherwise would. The problem isn’t that the events appearing on a screen are necessarily imaginary. The problem is scale. A magnifying glass can show something real while still altering its apparent size. A social-media feed can do something similar to the world. A feed isn’t the world. It’s a selection system. The episode also examines doomscrolling, the repeated consumption of distressing online information even when that consumption is increasing anxiety, fear, helplessness, or emotional exhaustion. Constant awareness can begin to resemble responsibility. Every new crisis appears to demand attention. Every developing story feels unfinished until the next update arrives. Every prediction of what might happen tomorrow begins occupying the emotional space of something happening now. This leads Dr. Rey to his own framework, Temporal Architecture™. Human beings don’t merely experience events. We organize them through time. Some things belong to the present. Some belong to tomorrow. Some may matter months from now. Others occurred decades ago. Many possibilities may never become personally relevant at all. Healthy temporal structure gives these events distance from one another. Digital life can collapse that distance. Yesterday’s catastrophe remains visible beside today’s emergency while tomorrow’s prediction is already demanding an emotional response. Past, present, and hypothetical future begin arriving as one continuous crisis. Dr. Rey describes this as temporal collapse. When everything becomes psychologically present at once, everything begins to feel urgent. The solution isn’t ignorance. It’s the restoration of scale. Richard is encouraged to conduct a simple experiment: stop being continuously informed. Rather than allowing an algorithm to decide when frightening information enters his awareness, he can choose deliberate periods for checking reliable news sources and leave the rest of the day available for ordinary life. Being informed doesn’t require experiencing the entire planet in real time. The episode then introduces the idea of rebuilding the near field. Instead of beginning each morning with the entire world, begin with what’s physically and practically present. What’s happening within twenty feet? Is anyone you love in immediate danger? Is there a problem that genuinely requires action today? Does your body need food, movement, rest, sunlight, conversation, or sleep? What can your hands actually influence? This isn’t denial. It’s proportion. The world delivered through a phone and the world available through direct human perception aren’t always psychologically equivalent. People need contact with both. Richard’s insomnia also receives serious attention. Dr. Rey recommends creating a hard boundary around nighttime information consumption. No catastrophe hunting in bed. No checking whether civilization survived the previous fifteen minutes. No inviting a fresh geopolitical or economic crisis into the nervous system moments before asking that same nervous system to sleep. Persistent insomnia deserves professional attention, particularly when anxiety begins interfering with work, concentration, relationships, physical health, or ordinary functioning. Dr. Rey returns to one of his recurring principles: Different states make different decisions. For this episode, he extends it: Different states make different forecasts. At two in the morning, exhausted and frightened, the mind can become a terrible futurist. Every trend appears permanent. Every threat seems connected to every other threat. Every uncertainty begins looking like evidence that collapse is inevitable. Richard is advised not to ask an exhausted nervous system to predict civilization. Let morning have a vote. The episode also examines the difference between observing humanity and participating in it. People may spend hours encountering hundreds of human beings through comments, videos, headlines, arguments, photographs, and posts while experiencing very little actual human presence. That can create the strange condition of being saturated with people while feeling profoundly disconnected from them. So Dr. Rey recommends physical-scale relationships. Sit across from someone. Take a walk. Share a meal. Have one uninterrupted conversation. Ask another person how they’re actually doing. The answer to digital disconnection may not be more communication. It may be more presence. Richard doesn’t need to solve the economy tonight. He doesn’t need to settle the future of technology. He doesn’t need to determine whether civilization is entering a golden age, a dark age, or simply another difficult period in a very long human history. He needs his scale back. His body. His room. His people. His next responsibility. His next hour. Then tomorrow. Mailbag XXXVII: When the World Feels Like It’s Ending is for listeners interested in doomscrolling, anxiety, information overload, social media anxiety, news fatigue, insomnia, economic anxiety, technology and mental health, nervous-system regulation, media psychology, the availability heuristic, Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman, Temporal Architecture, digital overwhelm, catastrophizing, uncertainty, loneliness, social disconnection, stress management, and finding emotional stability in an unstable world. The world may contain serious problems worth understanding. But instability isn’t the same thing as apocalypse. Awareness doesn’t require continuous alarm. Sometimes the clearest way to understand the world is to stop staring at the magnifying glass long enough to remember its actual size. Richard doesn’t need to find his footing in the entire world. Nobody has feet that large. He needs to find the ground beneath the two he already has. The Observable Unknown is a podcast exploring consciousness at the intersection of neuroscience, culture, and lived experience. It is written and hosted by Dr. Juan Carlos Rey of drjuancarlosrey.com and crowscupboard.com, an interdisciplinary scholar whose work bridges neuroscience, philosophy, and the interior dimensions of human experience.

0:00-7:35

transcript

No transcript — this publisher did not publish one.

show notes

Why does the world suddenly feel as though it’s falling apart?

What happens when war, politics, economic uncertainty, social conflict, catastrophe, technology, and other people’s crises arrive through the same screen, all day, every day?

And how do you find your footing when everything begins to feel urgent at once?

In Mailbag XXXVII of The Observable Unknown, Dr. Juan Carlos Rey responds to Richard L., a listener who says the world has begun to feel frighteningly strange, disconnected, magnified, and increasingly unmanageable.

Richard describes a sense that something may be wrong with him because nearly everything around him appears unstable. Technology seems to deliver too much information too quickly. Economic pressures add another layer of uncertainty. People feel distant from one another, while every problem seems larger than it once did.

The anxiety has begun interfering with his sleep.

He asks a deceptively simple question:

How do I find my footing again?

Dr. Rey begins by separating two very different statements:

“The world contains frightening things.”

and:

“The whole world is ending.”

The first may describe genuine conditions.

The second may be a conclusion produced by a nervous system struggling to process too many threats at once.

That distinction becomes the foundation of an episode about doomscrolling, information overload, anxiety, social media, insomnia, nervous-system regulation, uncertainty, media consumption, and the psychological effects of continuous exposure to crisis.

Richard uses a revealing phrase in his letter:

“People knowing too much too fast.”

For most of human history, frightening events possessed distance.

A disaster could occur somewhere else.

A political crisis might reach people hours or days later.

A conflict unfolding thousands of miles away didn’t necessarily enter the bedroom before sleep.

Digital technology has changed that relationship with information.

A war, wildfire, market decline, murder, political scandal, natural disaster, celebrity crisis, personal tragedy, and ordinary social update can now arrive within moments of one another.

All of them occupy the same screen.

All of them compete for the same attention.

The nervous system receives the sequence without any natural distinction between what requires immediate action and what requires none.

The feed simply presents the next event.

Dr. Rey connects this experience to the availability heuristic, associated with psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. When examples of danger, conflict, or catastrophe become extremely easy to recall, people may begin judging those events as more common, immediate, or probable than they otherwise would.

The problem isn’t that the events appearing on a screen are necessarily imaginary.

The problem is scale.

A magnifying glass can show something real while still altering its apparent size.

A social-media feed can do something similar to the world.

A feed isn’t the world. It’s a selection system.

The episode also examines doomscrolling, the repeated consumption of distressing online information even when that consumption is increasing anxiety, fear, helplessness, or emotional exhaustion.

Constant awareness can begin to resemble responsibility.

Every new crisis appears to demand attention.

Every developing story feels unfinished until the next update arrives.

Every prediction of what might happen tomorrow begins occupying the emotional space of something happening now.

This leads Dr. Rey to his own framework, Temporal Architecture™.

Human beings don’t merely experience events.

We organize them through time.

Some things belong to the present.

Some belong to tomorrow.

Some may matter months from now.

Others occurred decades ago.

Many possibilities may never become personally relevant at all.

Healthy temporal structure gives these events distance from one another.

Digital life can collapse that distance.

Yesterday’s catastrophe remains visible beside today’s emergency while tomorrow’s prediction is already demanding an emotional response.

Past, present, and hypothetical future begin arriving as one continuous crisis.

Dr. Rey describes this as temporal collapse.

When everything becomes psychologically present at once, everything begins to feel urgent.

The solution isn’t ignorance.

It’s the restoration of scale.

Richard is encouraged to conduct a simple experiment: stop being continuously informed.

Rather than allowing an algorithm to decide when frightening information enters his awareness, he can choose deliberate periods for checking reliable news sources and leave the rest of the day available for ordinary life.

Being informed doesn’t require experiencing the entire planet in real time.

The episode then introduces the idea of rebuilding the near field.

Instead of beginning each morning with the entire world, begin with what’s physically and practically present.

What’s happening within twenty feet?

Is anyone you love in immediate danger?

Is there a problem that genuinely requires action today?

Does your body need food, movement, rest, sunlight, conversation, or sleep?

What can your hands actually influence?

This isn’t denial.

It’s proportion.

The world delivered through a phone and the world available through direct human perception aren’t always psychologically equivalent.

People need contact with both.

Richard’s insomnia also receives serious attention.

Dr. Rey recommends creating a hard boundary around nighttime information consumption.

No catastrophe hunting in bed.

No checking whether civilization survived the previous fifteen minutes.

No inviting a fresh geopolitical or economic crisis into the nervous system moments before asking that same nervous system to sleep.

Persistent insomnia deserves professional attention, particularly when anxiety begins interfering with work, concentration, relationships, physical health, or ordinary functioning.

Dr. Rey returns to one of his recurring principles:

Different states make different decisions.

For this episode, he extends it:

Different states make different forecasts.

At two in the morning, exhausted and frightened, the mind can become a terrible futurist.

Every trend appears permanent.

Every threat seems connected to every other threat.

Every uncertainty begins looking like evidence that collapse is inevitable.

Richard is advised not to ask an exhausted nervous system to predict civilization.

Let morning have a vote.

The episode also examines the difference between observing humanity and participating in it.

People may spend hours encountering hundreds of human beings through comments, videos, headlines, arguments, photographs, and posts while experiencing very little actual human presence.

That can create the strange condition of being saturated with people while feeling profoundly disconnected from them.

So Dr. Rey recommends physical-scale relationships.

Sit across from someone.

Take a walk.

Share a meal.

Have one uninterrupted conversation.

Ask another person how they’re actually doing.

The answer to digital disconnection may not be more communication.

It may be more presence.

Richard doesn’t need to solve the economy tonight.

He doesn’t need to settle the future of technology.

He doesn’t need to determine whether civilization is entering a golden age, a dark age, or simply another difficult period in a very long human history.

He needs his scale back.

His body.

His room.

His people.

His next responsibility.

His next hour.

Then tomorrow.

Mailbag XXXVII: When the World Feels Like It’s Ending is for listeners interested in doomscrolling, anxiety, information overload, social media anxiety, news fatigue, insomnia, economic anxiety, technology and mental health, nervous-system regulation, media psychology, the availability heuristic, Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman, Temporal Architecture, digital overwhelm, catastrophizing, uncertainty, loneliness, social disconnection, stress management, and finding emotional stability in an unstable world.

The world may contain serious problems worth understanding.

But instability isn’t the same thing as apocalypse.

Awareness doesn’t require continuous alarm.

Sometimes the clearest way to understand the world is to stop staring at the magnifying glass long enough to remember its actual size.

Richard doesn’t need to find his footing in the entire world.

Nobody has feet that large.

He needs to find the ground beneath the two he already has.

The Observable Unknown is a podcast exploring consciousness at the intersection of neuroscience, culture, and lived experience. It is written and hosted by Dr. Juan Carlos Rey of drjuancarlosrey.com and crowscupboard.com, an interdisciplinary scholar whose work bridges neuroscience, philosophy, and the interior dimensions of human experience.