Skip to content
Artwork for Reformed Thinking
Reformed Thinking · October 23 · 46 min

Theological Exegesis and Reader-Response Criticism: Interpreting Scripture Faithfully

Deep Dive into New Testament Exegesis: A Handbook for Students and Pastors by Gordon D. Fee - Appendix: The Task of Theological Exegesis and Reader-Response Criticism Gordon D. Fee argues that theological exegesis must remain anchored in historical and literary inquiry to uncover the divine-human intention behind scripture, contrasting this approach with reader-response criticism. While reader-response theory dismisses authorial intent and leaves meaning entirely up to the audience, the author points out that this postmodern method suffers from internal contradictions since its own practitioners write books intended to persuade others. Although the author rejects an exclusive reliance on reader-response methods, he suggests that modern techniques like rhetorical criticism and narratology can still help interpreters view biblical passages more holistically. Furthermore, recognizing that interpreters always bring personal presuppositions to scripture should not lead to despair, but rather drive them to examine their biases with greater humility. Ultimately, interpreters must remain dedicated to understanding how God originally communicated through the text so that the faithful can hear and obey divine revelation. Reformed Theologian GPT: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-XXwzX1gnv-reformed-theologian Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReformedExplainer Worship Music: https://suno.com/playlist/3a498d0f-c90e-4981-8aa7-59834e7239f7 https://buymeacoffee.com/edi2730

0:00-46:27

transcript

No transcript — this publisher did not publish one.

show notes

Deep Dive into New Testament Exegesis: A Handbook for Students and Pastors by Gordon D. Fee - Appendix: The Task of Theological Exegesis and Reader-Response Criticism


Gordon D. Fee argues that theological exegesis must remain anchored in historical and literary inquiry to uncover the divine-human intention behind scripture, contrasting this approach with reader-response criticism. While reader-response theory dismisses authorial intent and leaves meaning entirely up to the audience, the author points out that this postmodern method suffers from internal contradictions since its own practitioners write books intended to persuade others. Although the author rejects an exclusive reliance on reader-response methods, he suggests that modern techniques like rhetorical criticism and narratology can still help interpreters view biblical passages more holistically. Furthermore, recognizing that interpreters always bring personal presuppositions to scripture should not lead to despair, but rather drive them to examine their biases with greater humility. Ultimately, interpreters must remain dedicated to understanding how God originally communicated through the text so that the faithful can hear and obey divine revelation.


Reformed Theologian GPT: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-XXwzX1gnv-reformed-theologian

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReformedExplainer

Worship Music: https://suno.com/playlist/3a498d0f-c90e-4981-8aa7-59834e7239f7

https://buymeacoffee.com/edi2730