Skip to content
Sign in
Artwork for Programming Tech Brief By HackerNoon
Programming Tech Brief By HackerNoon · Friday · 6 min

The Biggest Risk in AI-Assisted Coding Might Be Your Own Brain

This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/the-biggest-risk-in-ai-assisted-coding-might-be-your-own-brain. A 2025 randomized trial found experienced developers were 19% slower with AI tools while believing they were 20% faster. METR has since marked those results out Check more stories related to programming at: https://hackernoon.com/c/programming. You can also check exclusive content about #ai-assisted-coding, #developer-productivity, #ai-coding-tools, #automation-bias, #cognitive-fluency, #human-ai-interaction, #ai-code-review, #metr-ai-productivity-study, and more. This story was written by: @beyondthecode. Learn more about this writer by checking @beyondthecode's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com. A 2025 randomized trial found experienced developers were 19% slower with AI tools while believing they were 20% faster. METR has since marked those results out of date, and its follow-up was unreliable, so the speed question is open. The perception gap is the lasting finding. This piece uses psychology (fluency, automation bias, the IKEA effect) to explain it and offers a workflow to counter it.

0:00-6:59
Play in

transcript

No transcript — this publisher did not publish one.

show notes

This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/the-biggest-risk-in-ai-assisted-coding-might-be-your-own-brain.
A 2025 randomized trial found experienced developers were 19% slower with AI tools while believing they were 20% faster. METR has since marked those results out
Check more stories related to programming at: https://hackernoon.com/c/programming. You can also check exclusive content about #ai-assisted-coding, #developer-productivity, #ai-coding-tools, #automation-bias, #cognitive-fluency, #human-ai-interaction, #ai-code-review, #metr-ai-productivity-study, and more.

This story was written by: @beyondthecode. Learn more about this writer by checking @beyondthecode's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.

A 2025 randomized trial found experienced developers were 19% slower with AI tools while believing they were 20% faster. METR has since marked those results out of date, and its follow-up was unreliable, so the speed question is open. The perception gap is the lasting finding. This piece uses psychology (fluency, automation bias, the IKEA effect) to explain it and offers a workflow to counter it.

links13

more episodes

All episodes