Choosing the Right RPC Framework for .NET

This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/choosing-the-right-rpc-framework-for-net. WitRPC vs SignalR vs gRPC vs CoreWCF: measured benchmarks, transports, serialization and Blazor support, with an open-source benchmark suite. Check more stories related to programming at: https://hackernoon.com/c/programming. You can also check exclusive content about #dotnet, #rpc, #grpc, #signalr, #benchmarking, #csharp, #distributed-systems, #inter-process-communication, and more. This story was written by: @dmitrat. Learn more about this writer by checking @dmitrat's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com. I benchmarked four RPC options for .NET on the same hardware and the same intercontinental network path, then compared them on developer experience, transports, serialization, discovery, and Blazor/AOT support. WitRPC led both benchmark sets; gRPC was four times slower on large unary payloads; SignalR stayed strong for browser fan-out; CoreWCF is a migration path rather than a new-project choice. The benchmark suite is open source, so every number can be reproduced or refuted.