transcript
show notes
Our Changing World takes a deep dive into controversial plans by US company Colossal Biosciences, backed by filmmaker Peter Jackson, to de-extinct the Moa. In part two of a two-part series, Sharon Brettkelly looks at whether it SHOULD be done.
Sign up to the Our Changing World monthly newsletter for episode backstories, science analysis and more.
LEARN MORE:
- Check out this explainer from Katie Kenny for the proposed Gene Technology changes.
- RNZ’s Monique Steel looks at who is backing the stalled Gene Technology Bill.
- Listen as Kathryn Ryan talks to Kennedy Warne about how de-extincting the moa might fit with conservation efforts.
- Ben Novak talks to RNZ’s Saturday Morning show about de-extincting the passenger pigeon.
GUESTS:
- Professor Amanda Black, Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Lincoln University and Director of Bioprotection Aotearoa.
- Professor Phillip Wilcox, bioethicist and quantitative geneticist, University of Otago.
- Andrew Pask, Chief Biology Officer, Colossal Biosciences
- Associate Professor Nic Rawlence, Director of Otago Palaeogenetics Laboratory, University of Otago.
IN THIS EPISODE:
(00:00) Should we bring moa back?
(01:36) Colossal’s plan to bring back moa
(03:00) Who benefits from de-extinction
(07:33) Māori perspectives, consent and data sovereignty
(10:55) Could New Zealand stop the project?
(14:43) Considering all the aspects of de-extinction
(18:30) De-extinction vortex and the ethics of breeding and consultation…
links13