Britain Doesn't Have an Inequality Problem
Streams straight from the publisher. podnod never proxies or re-hosts episode audio.
Is UK wealth inequality actually rising? Wes Streeting calls inequality "the fracture running through modern Britain", and the coming budget leans on the same story. Neil Woodford has spent weeks in the data, and it says something very different.
In this episode, Neil and Jon work through what the official numbers show: the top 10 percent's share of British wealth was 56 percent in 1980 and 57 percent four decades later, flat through the biggest asset boom in the country's history. They explain why compounding means wealth gaps should widen automatically, and what cancelled it: the occupational pension revolution, faster pay growth at the bottom, and a tax system where the top 1 percent of earners now pay 28 percent of all income tax.
Then the measurement problem. The gap between Britain's richest and poorest fifth is 12 to 1 before taxes and benefits, and 3.3 to 1 after. Same country, same year, same statisticians. Which number you get quoted depends on who is quoting it.
Finally: does inequality actually damage growth? Neil's answer, and what it means for the tax rises now being floated ahead of the budget.
No links were found in this episode’s notes.
- 0:00The number that shouldn’t be possible
- 2:39Why wealth gaps grow automatically
- 5:45Forty years, one percentage point
- 6:51What cancelled the compound maths
- 10:54The 12-to-1 trick
- 13:31Which inequality number is real
- 17:46Does inequality kill growth?
- 23:36What the budget could break