In Moscow's Shadows 250: Moscow's Comms Playbook (And Why It's So Bad)
Streams straight from the publisher. PodNod never proxies or re-hosts episode audio.
A Russian drone hits a Romanian apartment block, two civilians are injured, and suddenly a stray weapon becomes a case study in how Putin’s Kremlin handles bad news. Why does the Kremlin’s crisis management default to a belligerent, self-sabotaging sequence that turns a manageable incident into a wider political problem?
It comes down to the priorities of an insecure, personalistic authoritarian system that equates any admission of failure with weakness, that regards information as a battlefield, and which lacks institutional filters between personality and policy.
Details of the 23 June event in Potsdam I mentioned are:
https://www.bundeswehr.de/de/marc-galeotti-autocracy-vs-technocracy-explaining-ukraine-war-6107930
The podcast's corporate partner and sponsor is Conducttr, which provides software for innovative and immersive crisis exercises in hybrid warfare, counter-terrorism, civil affairs and similar situations.
You can also follow my blog, In Moscow's Shadows, and become one of the podcast's supporting Patrons and gain question-asking rights and access to exclusive extra materials including the (almost-) weekly Govorit Moskva news briefing right here.
Conducttr
conducttr.comIn Moscow's Shadows
inmoscowsshadows.wordpress.comhere
patreon.com
- 0:00Milestone Introduction And The Incident
- 1:33Drone Hits Romania And Injures Civilians
- 4:24Accident Or NATO Test Narrative
- 8:47Kremlin Crisis Response In Five Steps
- 10:04Romania Arms Up And NATO Rethinks
- 14:50Sponsor Break And Listener Support
- 16:04Why The Kremlin Cannot Admit Fault
- 21:04Infowar: Infoshum And Competing Stories
- 26:40Narrative Escalation As Asymmetric Deterrence
- 32:02Core Takeaways On Kremlin Psychology
- 39:42Closing Thoughts And Where To Follow