Skip to content
Artwork for Fire Science Show
Fire Science Show · Wednesday · 49 min

273 - ASET/RSET concept - flawed or great?

ASET/RSET is the fire safety engineering idea that sounds almost too clean to argue with: the building must give you more time to escape than you need to get out. But once you try to prove it in a real project, the simplicity could and and the hard questions start. Where does “time zero” actually begin: ignition, detection, or alarm? What does it mean for tenability to fail in a place where nobody is anymore? And are we designing safer buildings, or just winning a seconds-on-a-spreadsheet contest? I break down the Available Safe Egress Time and Required Safe Egress Time concept from both sides: the human evacuation model and the fire model. On the RSET side, we talk about detection and alarm strategy, pre-movement time distributions, and why congestion, stair capacity, and occupant behavior can dominate the result. On the ASET side, we get into CFD fire modeling, tenability criteria like visibility, heat, and toxicity, and the huge responsibility that comes with choosing a design fire that is both plausible and fail-safe. I also explain why fire location can completely change outcomes even when the heat release rate curve is identical. We also tackle the famous criticism of ASET/RSET, where it truly breaks down (especially residential scenarios), and why I still find it useful in complex spaces like public venues and tunnels. To move beyond one “magic number,” I share practical alternatives like scenario-by-scenario comparisons, probabilistic thinking, ASET/RSET maps, and agent-based tenability approaches, plus a look at digital twin possibilities for smarter evacuation guidance. If this helped you rethink how you use ASET/RSET in performance-based fire engineering, subscribe, share the episode with a colleague, and leave a review so more engineers can find it. What’s the toughest ASET/RSET argument you’ve had to defend? ----- Three mentioned links in the episode: Rino's pre evacuation time distributions: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711218302212 Vyto's paper here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/fam.1025 Tenability survey paper here: https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105046523596?origin=resultslist ---- The Fire Science Show is produced by the Fire Science Media in collaboration with OFR Consultants. Thank you to the podcast sponsor for their continuous support towards our mission.

0:00 · Why Revisit Old Fundamentals-49:59

transcript

No transcript — this publisher did not publish one.

show notes

ASET/RSET is the fire safety engineering idea that sounds almost too clean to argue with: the building must give you more time to escape than you need to get out. But once you try to prove it in a real project, the simplicity could and and the hard questions start. Where does “time zero” actually begin: ignition, detection, or alarm? What does it mean for tenability to fail in a place where nobody is anymore? And are we designing safer buildings, or just winning a seconds-on-a-spreadsheet contest?

I break down the Available Safe Egress Time and Required Safe Egress Time concept from both sides: the human evacuation model and the fire model. On the RSET side, we talk about detection and alarm strategy, pre-movement time distributions, and why congestion, stair capacity, and occupant behavior can dominate the result. On the ASET side, we get into CFD fire modeling, tenability criteria like visibility, heat, and toxicity, and the huge responsibility that comes with choosing a design fire that is both plausible and fail-safe. I also explain why fire location can completely change outcomes even when the heat release rate curve is identical.

We also tackle the famous criticism of ASET/RSET, where it truly breaks down (especially residential scenarios), and why I still find it useful in complex spaces like public venues and tunnels. To move beyond one “magic number,” I share practical alternatives like scenario-by-scenario comparisons, probabilistic thinking, ASET/RSET maps, and agent-based tenability approaches, plus a look at digital twin possibilities for smarter evacuation guidance.

If this helped you rethink how you use ASET/RSET in performance-based fire engineering, subscribe, share the episode with a colleague, and leave a review so more engineers can find it. What’s the toughest ASET/RSET argument you’ve had to defend?

-----

Three mentioned links in the episode:

Rino's pre evacuation time distributions: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711218302212
Vyto's paper here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/fam.1025
Tenability survey paper here: https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105046523596?origin=resultslist

----
The Fire Science Show is produced by the Fire Science Media in collaboration with OFR Consultants. Thank you to the podcast sponsor for their continuous support towards our mission.

chapters

12 chapters