Skip to content
Sign in
Artwork for Clown Cast
Clown Cast · Yesterday · 14 min

Underestimating the Fog

Does clutch performance exist? Joey's test came back as 'can't tell'—and that distinction is everything. This episode explores Bill James' classic essay on why absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, and what happens when your detector isn't sensitive enough. Sometimes the biggest finding is admitting what the fog won't let you see. 00:00:00 - Opening the sports analytics deep dive 00:01:39 - On signals and detection: why absence of signal isn't proof of nothing 00:03:18 - Mathletics and the state of sports measurement 00:04:53 - The conclusion: Can't tell 00:12:16 - Why the detection method failed: mesh too wide --- Sources & further reading: • Bill James — Underestimating the Fog (SABR Baseball Research Journal, 2004): https://sabr.org/journal/article/underestimating-the-fog/ • Winston, Nestler, Pelechrinis — Mathletics 2nd ed., contents ("Was Tony Perez a Great Clutch Hitter?"): https://books.google.com/books/about/Mathletics.html?id=L544EAAAQBAJ • Scott Powers — Player Evaluation and In-Game Strategy (lecture notes): https://saberpowers.com/teaching/smgt430/lecture/player_eval_ingame_strategy.pdf • Scott Powers — Markov Chains and Win Probability (lecture notes): https://saberpowers.com/teaching/smgt430/lecture/markov_chain_win_probability.pdf • Sameer Deshpande — Lecture 4, adjusted plus/minus (leverage quote): https://skdeshpande91.github.io/stat479_fall2025/lectures/lecture04.html • Ferrante and Fonseca — On the winning probabilities and mean durations of volleyball (JQAS 2014): https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:10:y:2014:i:2:p:8:n:9 This podcast episode was fully generated by AI — research, script, voices, and production. Built with Claude, Piper TTS, and automated pipeline tooling.

0:00-14:56
Play in

transcript

No transcript — this publisher did not publish one.

show notes

Does clutch performance exist? Joey's test came back as 'can't tell'—and that distinction is everything. This episode explores Bill James' classic essay on why absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, and what happens when your detector isn't sensitive enough. Sometimes the biggest finding is admitting what the fog won't let you see.

00:00:00 - Opening the sports analytics deep dive
00:01:39 - On signals and detection: why absence of signal isn't proof of nothing
00:03:18 - Mathletics and the state of sports measurement
00:04:53 - The conclusion: Can't tell
00:12:16 - Why the detection method failed: mesh too wide

---
Sources & further reading:
• Bill James — Underestimating the Fog (SABR Baseball Research Journal, 2004): https://sabr.org/journal/article/underestimating-the-fog/
• Winston, Nestler, Pelechrinis — Mathletics 2nd ed., contents ("Was Tony Perez a Great Clutch Hitter?"): https://books.google.com/books/about/Mathletics.html?id=L544EAAAQBAJ
• Scott Powers — Player Evaluation and In-Game Strategy (lecture notes): https://saberpowers.com/teaching/smgt430/lecture/player_eval_ingame_strategy.pdf
• Scott Powers — Markov Chains and Win Probability (lecture notes): https://saberpowers.com/teaching/smgt430/lecture/markov_chain_win_probability.pdf
• Sameer Deshpande — Lecture 4, adjusted plus/minus (leverage quote): https://skdeshpande91.github.io/stat479_fall2025/lectures/lecture04.html
• Ferrante and Fonseca — On the winning probabilities and mean durations of volleyball (JQAS 2014): https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:10:y:2014:i:2:p:8:n:9

This podcast episode was fully generated by AI — research, script, voices, and production. Built with Claude, Piper TTS, and automated pipeline tooling.

more episodes

All episodes