Streams straight from the publisher. PodNod never proxies or re-hosts episode audio.
David Lat joins Sarah Isgur (see ya later, French) to discuss the three-judge panel overturning Alabama’s congressional maps, a new lawsuit against President Donald Trump’s slush fund, and a lying Judge.
The Agenda:
–No redistricting according to race
–Nonsense lawsuits
–Dragging courts into political fights
–Moving honey buns is interstate commerce
–Sanction more judges?
–Feeling Wicker-ty
–The Arbitration Act is sexy!
–Making clerks very uncomfortable
Show Notes:
–Fernandez v. United States–Wickard v. Filburn
Advisory Opinions is a production of SCOTUSblog and The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a nonpartisan perspective. Click here to sign up for our new Advisory Opinions newsletter, and click here to access all of The Dispatch’s offerings, including audio versions of all our articles and newsletters. If you’d like to remove all ads from your podcast experience, consider becoming a premium Dispatch member by clicking here.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Dragging courts into political fights
nytimes.comMaking clerks very uncomfortable
reason.comPitchford v. Cain
scotusblog.comFlowers Foods v. Brock
scotusblog.comRutherford v. United States
scotusblog.comFernandez v. United States
scotusblog.comWickard v. Filburn
oyez.org SCOTUSblog
scotusblog.com The Dispatch
thedispatch.com Click here
scotusblog.com click here
thedispatch.com audio versions
thedispatch.com clicking here
thedispatch.commegaphone.fm/adchoices
megaphone.fm